Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,148
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Converged on a 12/21/2024 coastal storm, however ... much higher than normal uncertainty relative to very shortterm. May need nowcast for impacting east/SE regions


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 12/18/2024 at 11:20 AM, Prismshine Productions said:

6z GFS would be a very potent winter storm:

-Starts snowing Christmas Eve Night

-Snows until the night of the 26th

-flips to ZR due to a torched midlayer the morning of the 27th

-quick burst on heavy rate snow on the backside the afternoon of the 27rh



Sent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk
 

Expand  

Agree

It's close enough but the models are so weak with precip for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/18/2024 at 11:36 AM, SouthCoastMA said:

It was more like yesterday's 18z brought it close enough for a COC tease and since then there have been no noticeable improvements in the 0z/6z runs. heavy precip develops too late/offshore. I didn't stay up

Expand  

00z def improved from 18z but 06z did not improve from 00z and May have slightly regressed. Prob puts a cap on this things. We’ll see if 12z makes another bump back NW now that we are sampling most of the shortwave. If it doesn’t, that’s prob all she wrote. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/18/2024 at 11:44 AM, ORH_wxman said:

00z def improved from 18z but 06z did not improve from 00z and May have slightly regressed. Prob puts a cap on this things. We’ll see if 12z makes another bump back NW now that we are sampling most of the shortwave. If it doesn’t, that’s prob all she wrote. 

Expand  

Thanks, I briefly glanced at 0z and yeah it did look slightly better than 18z. Waiting til 12z for another bump nw is fair; we wouldn't need a ton of improvement here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/18/2024 at 11:53 AM, SouthCoastMA said:

Thanks, I briefly glanced at 0z and yeah it did look slightly better than 18z. Waiting til 12z for another bump nw is fair; we wouldn't need a ton of improvement here. 

Expand  

Yeah…I’ll add that I do think seeing 06z slightly regress is a bad sign. A lot of times if you get a hard trend inside 3 days, it will just continue for like 4-6 consecutive cycles. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/18/2024 at 11:53 AM, SouthCoastMA said:

Thanks, I briefly glanced at 0z and yeah it did look slightly better than 18z. Waiting til 12z for another bump nw is fair; we wouldn't need a ton of improvement here. 

Expand  

Ya, 0z was a big improvement across the board. See what 12z shows as Will said. You guys are in the best spot for something, so this could be yours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/18/2024 at 4:10 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I love the buns from people for not working myself into a lather over some light snow on the cape that needs an inexorable trend for the final 72 hours to be anything more. Let me remind myself to massage my prostate to that before bed.

Expand  

See, this was the operative word in my perfunctory assessment last night, and as expected, its already clear given the 006z suite that we have not met that criteria.

  On 12/18/2024 at 11:44 AM, ORH_wxman said:

00z def improved from 18z but 06z did not improve from 00z and May have slightly regressed. Prob puts a cap on this things. We’ll see if 12z makes another bump back NW now that we are sampling most of the shortwave. If it doesn’t, that’s prob all she wrote. 

Expand  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...