Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Converged on a 12/21/2024 coastal storm, however ... much higher than normal uncertainty relative to very shortterm. May need nowcast for impacting east/SE regions


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

EPS with a transfer off OBX

1734760800-JeQVcC8gmH8.webp.788c57b90c23543f800930175367bec5.webp

impressive compared to the utterly non-existence portrayed by the gefs ...

this below is a 972 low tucked into the bite region of ny, with a ton of cold air over alb-lower 'hampshire ... it's probably mix contention eventually but this probably is a lot of snow/wind prior...

image.png.7ce8728717de67995388bd48ba78fef0.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

impressive compared to the utterly non-existence portrayed by the gefs ...

this below is a 972 low tucked into the bite region of ny, with a ton of cold air over alb-lower 'hampshire ... it's probably mix contention eventually but this probably is a lot of snow/wind prior...

image.png.7ce8728717de67995388bd48ba78fef0.png

idk, I thought this was a pretty solid signal from the usually progressive GEFS

gfs-ememb_lowlocs_us_fh144-192.thumb.gif.5970765d427dc12b672e9d66087199c3.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Here’s 168. Again, can’t really ask for a lot more on a D7 prog. 
 

image.thumb.png.6da406e0ad13a9faa928ee2debbbca20.png

So that would mean this would get going on Friday. We’re getting into the medium term here. Interesting to see if the timeline of the 20th and 21st it’s consistent across other models. We were talking to 22nd yesterday I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brooklynwx99 said:

idk, I thought this was a pretty solid signal from the usually progressive GEFS

gfs-ememb_lowlocs_us_fh144-192.thumb.gif.5970765d427dc12b672e9d66087199c3.gif

i know what you're saying ...

i'm not talking about the concept of being in a good position at this far out in time...

i'm just comparing the eps ens that i provided above, to that scalar gefs...   the latter is clear whiff as is.   the comparison is interesting

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

impressive compared to the utterly non-existence portrayed by the gefs ...

this below is a 972 low tucked into the bite region of ny, with a ton of cold air over alb-lower 'hampshire ... it's probably mix contention eventually but this probably is a lot of snow/wind prior...

image.png.7ce8728717de67995388bd48ba78fef0.png

Yack....the mean is that far west? I wouldn't have guessed that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

So that would mean this would get going on Friday. We’re getting into the medium term here. Interesting to see if the timeline of the 20th and 21st it’s consistent across other models. We were talking to 22nd yesterday I believe.

EPS has been speeding up the second wave a bit more because it’s weaker on the first wave than a lot of other guidance. Esp the GFS suite which is slower. But regardless of whether it’s the 21st or the 22nd, we’d rather have the second wave be the main player because it has a deeper cold airmass in place and also a more poleward PNA ridge so it has higher end potential from a pure cyclogensis standpoint. 
 

The ceiling on the first wave is a lot lower. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Here’s 168. Again, can’t really ask for a lot more on a D7 prog. 
 

image.thumb.png.6da406e0ad13a9faa928ee2debbbca20.png

there's a subtly there that is important imo

the strongest solutions are biased on the left side of that 'inner spread' region.   i'm pretty sure those members, vs the outer/weaker ones ..., are in conflict over the degree of deep layer meridian character there is to the circulation mode at this time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

there's a subtly there that is important imo

the strongest solutions are biased on the left side of that 'inner spread' region.   i'm pretty sure those members, vs the outer/weaker ones ..., are in conflict over the degree of deep layer meridian character there is to the circulation mode at this time.

 

Yeah agreed. The more amplified solutions are all bombing this thing out into the 980s (and even 970s on the next frame…a couple of them due east of BOS.)

I think this definitely speaks to the “higher end potential” was I just talking about to Mark. If this amplifies enough to hit us, it’s likely to be a pretty strong system. Hopefully not too strong and too far west…lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brooklynwx99 said:

this also seems like a snow or bust kind of setup as long as SLP isn’t overhead or east. should get a nice HP filtering in 

Yeah. I suppose the high could retreat or the primary is too strong, but it’s one of the more legit airmasses we’ve seen surrounding a potential event.
 

Thats the thing. It does not need to be 504 thicknesses to snow. A good high to the north and decent antecedent airmass will work. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

EPS has been speeding up the second wave a bit more because it’s weaker on the first wave than a lot of other guidance. Esp the GFS suite which is slower. But regardless of whether it’s the 21st or the 22nd, we’d rather have the second wave be the main player because it has a deeper cold airmass in place and also a more pollard PNA ridge so it has higher end potential from a pure cyclogensis standpoint. 
 

The ceiling on the first wave is a lot lower. 

We’ve had a number of very amplified model runs over the last week so I would lean towards a more amplified and result. And this is starting to get the feel of that kind of system. The model show something big then they get confused and lose it for a couple of days and then they start to come back to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...