Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,682
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ptpageza
    Newest Member
    Ptpageza
    Joined

December Medium/ Long Range


Terpeast
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CAPE said:

My recollection is we were teased with classic Nino looks and NA blocking on the extended products for months, then ultimately seeing it advertised within a couple weeks on ens guidance when it finally went poof. Regardless, my expectation for the evolving longwave pattern is a significant -EPO developing and persisting for the first 10 days or so of Jan, with the Pacific puke induced Canadian heat ridge evolving into a modest -NAO. Beyond that, we shall see.

I think the overall pattern here is a lot safer since the Pacific looks locked into moving favorably... last year was pretty much fully dependent on the Atlantic, and the Atlantic itself was contingent on a cutter leading to massive wave breaking. very precarious

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CAPE said:

But we did see this last year, constantly depicted by guidance in the LR, and it never really materialized. Other variables have influence ofc. Last winter (being a Nino)we didn't have the -EPO. I know some others don't agree, but in a current day Nina that is a key feature imo to bring cold/ flatten the SER tendency. We will need at least some help in the NA to slow/suppress the flow to increase our chances of a wave tracking further south, or a hell of a lot of luck. Hopefully we get a modest -NAO period in conjunction with an EPO ridge- which is what we are seeing at the end of the ens runs/ continuing with the extended guidance. Once the cold is in place, it comes down to wave timing, and maybe we get a little southern stream action as well. Drooling over depicted epic blocking possibilities on LR guidance is a fools errand, as usual, imo. Well timed transient -NAO episodes will have to do the trick, and often do in a Nina when we get moderate snow events.

I share the skepticism but ironically the pacific was in a more Nina base state last year than this one so far.  I don’t know what it means. I think enso is decreasing in impact, especially when it’s weak or in contradiction with the pacific background state. But let me be clear, when I say I’m interested in that look, it’s with the notion maybe we get a window where we could get a snowstorm. A. Singular. One. I’m not suggesting 2010 or 1996 are walking through that door. I’m just hoping for a 2006 or 2000 here. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brooklynwx99 said:

i mean, the -EPO developing during the first week of Jan is a near certainty, we are going to have that feature barring a complete mishandling of the Pacific. the potential -NAO just ups the ante, and there is increasing confidence that one is going to form. it's showing up on all ensembles around day 10

I want to wait another 5-7 days to see if it sticks around, but it's promising. I'm not going to let last year's debacle influence my thinking all that much

I agree to an extent but I do think there is an applicable lesson to be taken from what happened regarding the long range teases in both 2019 and 2024. In both cases the dominant long wave influence was a strongly -pdo pacific base state. In both cases the extended guidance wanted to quickly morph the pattern into a canonical look for the SSTs.  Additionally NWP did a similar thing day 15+ in 2021 when a kind of hybrid pattern dominated yet at range the extended often wanted to resume a more canonical Nina look. I think guidance is over weighting enso SSTs at range. I don’t know the physics behind it but that seems too much a coincidence. 
 

But that isn’t necessarily what’s going on here. Actually guidance is bucking a standard weak cold enso look. Now that doesn’t mean it’s right. Maybe it’s wrong for a different reason now but I don’t think it’s doing the same thing as last year fwiw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

I agree to an extent but I do think there is an applicable lesson to be taken from what happened regarding the long range teases in both 2019 and 2024. In both cases the dominant long wave influence was a strongly -pdo pacific base state. In both cases the extended guidance wanted to quickly morph the pattern into a canonical look for the SSTs.  Additionally NWP did a similar thing day 15+ in 2021 when a kind of hybrid pattern dominated yet at range the extended often wanted to resume a more canonical Nina look. I think guidance is over weighting enso SSTs at range. I don’t know the physics behind it but that seems too much a coincidence. 
 

But that isn’t necessarily what’s going on here. Actually guidance is bucking a standard weak cold enso look. Now that doesn’t mean it’s right. Maybe it’s wrong for a different reason now but I don’t think it’s doing the same thing as last year fwiw. 

How many more years do you  think were looking at a - pdo?

How many years are we into this - cycle?

7 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Chris78 said:

How many more years do you  think were looking at a - pdo?

How many years are we into this - cycle?

7 years?

Im less sure of the larger PDO cycle, but we don’t need a wholesale PDO flip we just need the current near record negative one to end. There are cycles within cycles of the PDO.  Within the decades long larger cycles there are shorter spikes. We don’t need a crazy positive PDO. 2010 was neutral. 2014 was slightly negative.  A lot of the snowy winters in the 60s were neutral or slightly negative. But we need the -2 to -3 dip within the longer -pdo to end. 
 

There is some regularity to these cycles too. The last 3 severe -pdo periods lasted 4-9 years. We’re now 5 years in so it could start to flip anytime now. But it might take a few more years. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2024 at 8:12 PM, SnowLover22 said:

PDO trending upwards the first half of December. @psuhoffman what is your target value out of curosity.

 

If I am understanding the PDO correctly, the general "trough pattern" over the North Western Pacific Ocean that has been ongoing and forecast on the models should act to continue to help cause the PDO Index to rise. 

 

Screen Shot 2024-12-12 at 8.09.57 PM.png

Lets get this at -1.00 by January 1st

 

image.png.bec425927a1e580309c434b6cc7b0293.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CAPE said:

My recollection is we were teased with classic Nino looks and NA blocking on the extended products for months, then ultimately seeing it advertised within a couple weeks on ens guidance when it finally went poof. Regardless, my expectation for the evolving longwave pattern is a significant -EPO developing and persisting for the first 10 days or so of Jan, with the Pacific puke induced Canadian heat ridge evolving into a modest -NAO. Beyond that, we shall see.

2019 was always an epic-looking Week 3 of the weeklies.  Sometimes the tail end of the ENS would start to look good but it would then disappear.  Rinse and repeat all winter.

Last year it was well it was progressing nicely from d16 up to d10.  I seem to remember it breaking the d10 barrier at one point, and then completely collapsing. 

 

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't look so bad on the 384hr GFS ensemble mean

1A-40.gif

The thing is, I'm suspicious of the big +EPO ridge turning into a -NAO in the medium range (usually they don't run into each other like that). And for the last few days, the long range GEFS has tried to build a -EPO at the 384hr range, to lose it lately. That Pacific pattern has been stuck there for the last 3 days. Let's see what happens when we get closer. Verbatim, it's a good look, but I don't really like the evolution to getting there.  It might end up verifying as a slight -pna or something warmer. 

That particular panel, the way that it is, looks good though.  Let's see if the MJO remains strong going into the later phases.. Usually after such a strong +EPO, at H5 the pattern has to reload though. The ridging usually doesn't just go poleward all around and give us snow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

This doesn't look so bad on the 384hr GFS ensemble mean

1A-40.gif

The thing is, I'm suspicious of the big +EPO ridge turning into a -NAO in the medium range (usually they don't run into each other like that). And for the last few days, the long range GEFS has tried to build a -EPO at the 384hr range, to lose it lately. That Pacific pattern has been stuck there for the last 3 days. Let's see what happens when we get closer. Verbatim, it's a good look, but I don't really like the evolution to getting there.  It might end up verifying as a slight -pna or something warmer. 

That particular panel, the way that it is, looks good though. Let's see if the MJO remains strong going into the later phases.. Usually after such a strong +EPO, at H5 the pattern has to reload though. 

Ehh there's always a first let's try it out could be interesting to see something new with a +EPO turning into a

-NAO.... What can go wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kevin Reilly said:

Ehh there's always a first let's try it out could be interesting to see something new with a +EPO turning into a

-NAO.... What can go wrong?

Maybe the models are weighing too heavily the MJO? Should be interesting to see if it holds this look the next few days..  I also think at that time we are hitting Day 40 on the +PNA phase, which is usually a complete cycle. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deck Pic said:

November/December Snow events of 1"+ IMBY since December 2009.  Sucks but I don't worry about December here in UHI central.  Even Mt PSU probably only averages 5-6" in December.  

12/16/10: 1.5"

12/8/13: 1"

12/9/17: 2.25"

11/15/18: 2"

12/16/20: 1"

 

 

You need to move, that’s pitiful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...