RodneyS Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 7 hours ago, nw baltimore wx said: 6th place but theres no way I can win, so I’m ready to move to last after our big dog next week. You aren't out yet, @nw baltimore wx. Your only negative departure is DCA, but the entrants ahead of you aren't doing well there either, and so if you nailed the other three airports you would win. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nw baltimore wx Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 47 minutes ago, RodneyS said: You aren't out yet, @nw baltimore wx. Your only negative departure is DCA, but the entrants ahead of you aren't doing well there either, and so if you nailed the other three airports you would win. Thanks, but I’d still rather get the big dog and finish last! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 I’d like to thank all of my fans. Without your support, me being in the top 15 wouldn’t be possible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted February 13 Author Share Posted February 13 22 minutes ago, snowfan said: I’d like to thank all of my fans. Without your support, me being in the top 15 wouldn’t be possible. Don't shortchange yourself, @snowfan -- you are currently 12th. Unfortunately, because you have all negative departures, your chance of winning are the same as mine and 38 others -- zero. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 I don't see a path to a win needing 5" at BWI, 3.5" at IAD, and no snow at DCA (or RIC), that would be a tough ask. This is what I get for relying on DCA slant stick. Also, Arlwx12 will stay in front as far as any BWI snow is concerned with a 4.3" deficit, (I can tie at 5.0 or above, if IAD stays in my favor (arlwx12 is at 4.5" so as soon as IAD goes past 3.5" that possible tie is broken). It looks like high stakes and deck pic are in a very good position too, with 3" and 2.1" left to use at RIC, so they can easily pass me and arlwx12 as each 0.1" to 3.0" at RIC is a -0.2" differential for us before deficits are spent. There are others needing less snow at all locations, in 1-3" range, who will stay ahead of all of the above if that's all that we get now to ?? Apr. And a bigger fall than 5" will open it up for lots of larger forecasts. I figure on one 3-5" event and we're done. It will likely go very warm by mid to late march. even so, 1993? Feb 1993 was frigid in Great Lakes region as I recall living in Ontario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted February 13 Author Share Posted February 13 5 hours ago, Roger Smith said: I don't see a path to a win needing 5" at BWI, 3.5" at IAD, and no snow at DCA (or RIC), that would be a tough ask. This is what I get for relying on DCA slant stick. Also, Arlwx12 will stay in front as far as any BWI snow is concerned with a 4.3" deficit, (I can tie at 5.0 or above, if IAD stays in my favor (arlwx12 is at 4.5" so as soon as IAD goes past 3.5" that possible tie is broken). It looks like high stakes and deck pic are in a very good position too, with 3" and 2.1" left to use at RIC, so they can easily pass me and arlwx12 as each 0.1" to 3.0" at RIC is a -0.2" differential for us before deficits are spent. There are others needing less snow at all locations, in 1-3" range, who will stay ahead of all of the above if that's all that we get now to ?? Apr. And a bigger fall than 5" will open it up for lots of larger forecasts. I figure on one 3-5" event and we're done. It will likely go very warm by mid to late march. even so, 1993? Feb 1993 was frigid in Great Lakes region as I recall living in Ontario. The DCA measuring gurus have helped you and a number of other folks by revising downward yesterday's snow total there from 0.5 to 0.3 inches. It would be interesting to know how these revisions come about -- perhaps some of the gurus don't realize that you are not supposed to take snow away from the measuring location to make a snowman? In any event, here is the slightly revised leaderboard, subject to further revisions without warning. P.S. I have listed in red all of the unfortunates who have been eliminated . . . whoops, that includes me. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harv_poor Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 What to me is amazing is that besides the last three entrants on the table, there are only six entrants left who still have positive departures at all four sites. The closest WXDUDE64 has an overall positive departure of 24.4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Its a Breeze Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 2 hours ago, Harv_poor said: What to me is amazing is that besides the last three entrants on the table, there are only six entrants left who still have positive departures at all four sites. The closest WXDUDE64 has an overall positive departure of 24.4 Go big or go home! I'm going to need DCA to slow down a bit and the others to catch up please. Can't believe I may have been to low on DCA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gymengineer Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 6 hours ago, RodneyS said: The DCA measuring gurus have helped you and a number of other folks by revising downward yesterday's snow total there from 0.5 to 0.3 inches. It would be interesting to know how these revisions come about -- perhaps some of the gurus don't realize that you are not supposed to take snow away from the measuring location to make a snowman? In any event, here is the slightly revised leaderboard, subject to further revisions without warning. P.S. I have listed in red all of the unfortunates who have been eliminated . . . whoops, that includes me. Where are you seeing this? The Daily Almanac (and monthly daily data) for 2/12 is still showing 0.5". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted February 14 Author Share Posted February 14 3 hours ago, gymengineer said: Where are you seeing this? The Daily Almanac (and monthly daily data) for 2/12 is still showing 0.5". Thanks. What I was going by was Wednesday's daily report for DCA issued at 12:35 AM this morning, which may be found at "Observed Weather" "Daily Climate Report" for "Washington-National" at https://www.weather.gov/wrh/Climate?wfo=lwx. The newest version is currently for Thursday, but you can find the 12:35 AM version for Wednesday by clicking "2" at the top (in blue). It's head-scratching how these contradictions occur, but you are correct that the snow total for yesterday is now back up to 0.5 inches. The below table reflects that change for DCA: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted Wednesday at 11:14 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 11:14 PM We have a new leader, as RIC has already recorded 2.0 inches today. That puts @mattie gin first place, with @HighStakesa big threat to move into a tie before day's end and @southmdwatcherlurking if RIC records several more inches. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIC Airport Posted Thursday at 09:35 AM Share Posted Thursday at 09:35 AM 10 hours ago, RodneyS said: We have a new leader, as RIC has already recorded 2.0 inches today. That puts @mattie gin first place, with @HighStakesa big threat to move into a tie before day's end and @southmdwatcherlurking if RIC records several more inches. Storm total was 4.0" at RIC, so up to 11.7" for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted Thursday at 01:20 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 01:20 PM 3 hours ago, RIC Airport said: Storm total was 4.0" at RIC, so up to 11.7" for the season. Thanks - - see updated table below, which also includes another 0.1 at DCA: 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted Thursday at 11:24 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 11:24 PM FYI, each of the four airports recorded only a trace of snow today. However, I am updating the table to show that -- barring corrections to the snow totals -- two more contestants have been eliminated from contention, to bring that total to 50 (in red), leaving only 19 who still have a chance to win. Most stunningly, I have determined that co-leader @mattie g has bitten the dust. Why is that? Because while he could still finish in a first-place tie with @HighStakes, he would lose the tiebreaker based on his forecast of 8.6 inches of snow at Salisbury (SBY) vs High Stake's forecast of 10.8 inches there. Because SBY has already recorded 17.8 inches this season, mattie g is history -- just as the other 49 of us are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted Thursday at 11:31 PM Share Posted Thursday at 11:31 PM I’m filing a protest! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nw baltimore wx Posted yesterday at 02:20 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:20 AM I want our Salisbury pick to count. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now