weatherwiz Posted yesterday at 01:45 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:45 AM There was another earthquake in CT 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanks45 Posted yesterday at 01:48 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:48 AM 26 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: For those who like visuals…you can see what I mean on the H5 plot here. Stretched out TPV lobe to our north and northeast which really holds that high in by acting as a brick wall and forcing the confluence with the trough moving eastward. That look has been largely absent the last couple winters. During my college years in the early 2000s, I seem to remember having one of these storms in early December, multiple years in a row. Any similarities? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted yesterday at 01:49 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:49 AM 2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: There was another earthquake in CT 2.3 a hour ago.. two in SNE a few days apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted yesterday at 01:51 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:51 AM 3 minutes ago, Spanks45 said: During my college years in the early 2000s, I seem to remember having one of these storms in early December, multiple years in a row. Any similarities? Yes. 2002 and 2003 both had events on 12/5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 01:53 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:53 AM 1 hour ago, dendrite said: He may be a herpes fan Electric blue? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted yesterday at 01:53 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:53 AM 3 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: 2.3 a hour ago.. two in SNE a few days apart. How were winters following quakes AND fires? 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted yesterday at 01:55 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:55 AM 5 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: 2.3 a hour ago.. two in SNE a few days apart. Maybe CT will break off and float away into the Atlantic 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 01:55 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:55 AM 2 minutes ago, powderfreak said: How were winters following quakes AND fires? Epic! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 01:55 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:55 AM 2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Yes. 2002 and 2003 both had events on 12/5. Which one came with some serious cold? I used to have a Christmas party early in December and one was absolutely frigid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 01:58 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:58 AM 2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: Maybe CT will break off and float away into the Atlantic That would certainly help our chances with tropical though. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 01:58 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:58 AM 2 minutes ago, kdxken said: Which one came with some serious cold? I used to have a Christmas party early in December and one was absolutely frigid. Probably 02 if I had to guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM 1 minute ago, kdxken said: Which one came with some serious cold? I used to have a Christmas party early in December and one was absolutely frigid. Both were pretty cold right before the event. 2002 had a quick arctic shot a few days after the event where I think temps got near 0. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM 1 minute ago, WinterWolf said: Probably 02 if I had to guess. Both actually but 2003 was really cold with a lot more snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM 6 minutes ago, weathafella said: Both actually but 2003 was really cold with a lot more snow Are you talking about that December Jerry? Or 02-03 in general? If it’s the latter, then that’s why I guessed December of 02, because I remember the 02-03 winter being cold and snowy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM 13 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Epic! Its got a devastating ice storm vibe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 02:10 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:10 AM 10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Both were pretty cold right before the event. 2002 had a quick arctic shot a few days after the event where I think temps got near 0. That's the one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 02:11 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:11 AM 1 minute ago, powderfreak said: It’s got a devastating ice storm vibe. Yes, Fire and then Ice…we are like the new Iceland now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted yesterday at 02:21 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:21 AM 9 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Are you talking about that December Jerry? Or 02-03 in general? If it’s the latter, then that’s why I guessed December of 02, because I remember the 02-03 winter being cold and snowy. December but both were cold winters with January 2004 frigid! December featured a relaxed pattern but a rather stormy period around the holidays in 2002. The 2003 December storm was bigger but my recollection is the rest of the month was not so great. We then had suppression for the heart of winter but you may have done ok south of the pike in CT. NYC cleaned up in 2003-04. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted yesterday at 02:28 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:28 AM lol…NAM says you’re smart Tip. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted yesterday at 02:30 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:30 AM 2 minutes ago, weathafella said: lol…NAM says you’re smart Tip. NAM is awesome lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted yesterday at 02:39 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:39 AM 8 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: NAM is awesome lol As in? You must be talking about for Friday night, correct? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted yesterday at 02:39 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:39 AM ill be more excited if other models start showing it tonight.. it would be nice to get atleast a couple inches but temps are pretty marginal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted yesterday at 02:41 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:41 AM kuchie is less than the 10 to 1 maps and probably better to use 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 02:43 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:43 AM 19 minutes ago, weathafella said: December but both were cold winters with January 2004 frigid! December featured a relaxed pattern but a rather stormy period around the holidays in 2002. The 2003 December storm was bigger but my recollection is the rest of the month was not so great. We then had suppression for the heart of winter but you may have done ok south of the pike in CT. NYC cleaned up in 2003-04. Yes, I do remember 04’s January frigid spell now that you say that..single digits for highs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted yesterday at 02:51 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:51 AM 1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said: For those who like visuals…you can see what I mean on the H5 plot here. Stretched out TPV lobe to our north and northeast which really holds that high in by acting as a brick wall and forcing the confluence with the trough moving eastward. That look has been largely absent the last couple winters. I mentioned earlier. My knowledge is limited, but in my eyes, this is easily the best look we’ve had in 2 years. Don’t care if it’s November 30th 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted yesterday at 02:53 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:53 AM 2 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said: I actually told a bunch of these guys here in our text group I was expecting a very ugly Dallas season this year. They’ll verify that . I worried about the run defense, no RB, and lack of depth at WR. Unfortunately they’re even worse than I thought and I didn’t expect them to be better than .500 Go birds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted yesterday at 02:58 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:58 AM 2 hours ago, ineedsnow said: Mount Shasta is the place to be This Afternoon Snow. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. Steady temperature around 8. Wind chill values as low as -28. Windy, with a south southwest wind around 100 mph, with gusts as high as 125 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. Total daytime snow accumulation of 24 to 30 inches possible. Tonight Snow. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. Temperature rising to around 15 by 5am. Wind chill values as low as -25. Windy, with a southwest wind 90 to 95 mph decreasing to 80 to 85 mph after midnight. Winds could gust as high as 115 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 30 to 36 inches possible. Thursday Snow. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. High near 18. Wind chill values as low as -18. Windy, with a south southwest wind 70 to 75 mph, with gusts as high as 110 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 21 to 27 inches possible. Thursday Night Snow. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. Low around 13. Wind chill values as low as -13. Windy, with a south southwest wind 70 to 80 mph decreasing to 55 to 65 mph. Winds could gust as high as 115 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 18 to 24 inches possible. Friday Snow showers. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. High near 19. Windy, with a south wind 55 to 60 mph increasing to 65 to 70 mph in the afternoon. Winds could gust as high as 105 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 12 to 18 inches possible. Friday Night Snow showers. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. Low around 8. Windy. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 8 to 12 inches possible. Saturday Snow showers likely, mainly before 10am. Widespread blowing snow, mainly before 1pm. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 11. Windy. Chance of precipitation is 70%. New snow accumulation of 3 to 5 inches possible Nothing beats 12-18” from snow showers. Snow showers. The snow could be heavy at times. Widespread blowing snow. High near 19. Windy, with a south wind 55 to 60 mph increasing to 65 to 70 mph in the afternoon. Winds could gust as high as 105 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 12 to 18 inches possible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hailstoned Posted yesterday at 02:59 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:59 AM 1 hour ago, weatherwiz said: There was another earthquake in CT The "Moodus Noise" acting up. "Moodus" is a Native American word for "noise;" Moodus, CT and surroundings sit over what is apparently an active fault. My in laws have a summer cottage on a lake a couple of miles from Moodus center, and it is not unusual to hear a distant, sonic like, boom which has been an ongoing phenomenon for centuries-- on rare occasions accompanied with ground shaking like in this evening's 2.3 magnitude quake. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 03:02 AM Share Posted yesterday at 03:02 AM 20 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: kuchie is less than the 10 to 1 maps and probably better to use Don't don't steal our snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted yesterday at 03:15 AM Share Posted yesterday at 03:15 AM 35 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: kuchie is less than the 10 to 1 maps and probably better to use Positive snow depth increase is the map to use with the mild low level airmass. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now