Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Blowvember - and not named for wind potential


Go Kart Mozart
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

it'll be interesting watching these operational models engineer nothing out of a +pna/-nao loading pattern going forward.  

but, can't say this wasn't suspected.   i spent more time than i should writing about the all but dependable cold loss in guidance, when moving patterns from the ext into mid range just the other day.

also, those upside-down lows, with snow on the under belly in drilling west wind, and warm ( relatively so...) rains wrapped around the n side ( 120 hours) will tend to really go one way or the other. that's an unusual/rare verification as is.  my guess in this case it goes to just rain.   this is a -2, western limbed -nao with under running +pnap, after novie 15 ... where's the cold air.

WTTTE 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent chance of first flakes for many next weekend with that deep ULL moving overhead. Prob no accumulation but the novelty is always there on first flakes of the season. 
 

No true arctic cold in sight until you flip the EPO/WPO region (broken record the last 2-3 winters) but you’ll at least get some seasonably coldish weather for a few days when you have a ULL like that overhead. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

fwiw .. .the 12z gefs and cmc ens means are significantly more deep with that closing southern component rex configuration next week ...  this looks like it's trying to head toward a triple point nor'easter that abandons a old inland center type synoptic evolution.   

image.png.b4144b644f5aed78298e3bfea94f6042.png

That’s starting to be a tad interesting…be nice to break the monotony of 3 months of stellar weather…I mean even great weather for 3 months can get old too. Lol. 

  • Like 2
  • Crap 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Decent chance of first flakes for many next weekend with that deep ULL moving overhead. Prob no accumulation but the novelty is always there on first flakes of the season. 
 

No true arctic cold in sight until you flip the EPO/WPO region (broken record the last 2-3 winters) but you’ll at least get some seasonably coldish weather for a few days when you have a ULL like that overhead. 

Even with each run shifting the ULL north ? GFS has it well north of where 6z was 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

With what Tip just posted it looks pretty nice in that ensemble depiction.  

I am thinking the ULL ends up tracking over NNE with the primary Lakes Cutter and a period of showers happens Thursday along the cold front . Similar to last Sunday night. Maybe Tip is right with the big Noreaster call. Time will reveal 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

fwiw .. .the 12z gefs and cmc ens means are significantly more deep with that closing southern component rex configuration next week ...  this looks like it's trying to head toward a triple point nor'easter that abandons a old inland center type synoptic evolution.   

image.png.b4144b644f5aed78298e3bfea94f6042.png

Exaggerating but feels like that hasn't happened in 20 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

I am thinking the ULL ends up tracking over NNE with the primary Lakes Cutter and a period of showers happens Thursday along the cold front . Similar to last Sunday night. Maybe Tip is right with the big Noreaster call. Time will reveal 

You could certainly be correct on that.  
 

At some point though something will put an end to this 3 month long pattern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Even with each run shifting the ULL north ? GFS has it well north of where 6z was 

Even if it tracks a touch north of us it’s still a cyclonic flow with lots of clouds/snow showers/flurries. So yeah, unless it tracks way north, I’d still feel decent about many getting first flakes. I’m not talking accumulations. We’d need it tracking south of us to really talk about accumulating snow outside the upslope spots. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, rimetree said:

Exaggerating but feels like that hasn't happened in 20 years

it's been rarefying, sure tho. 

correction to what Kevin just said... I did not 'make a call' for a 'big nor'easter'   - i made a generic implication interpretation of where those particular ensemble means appear to be trending. 

this is how the trump supporters create their fake realities and then believe in them.   someone prevaricates an interpretation, ...then, their audience, being of cutting edge sharp intellectual pedigree rural red origin as they are ... they go ahead and 'analyze' what's said and shockingly, can't come up with any reason to question it.   budda boom budda bing ... alternative reality is painted and the hapless contingent of morons are thusly guidance by an illusion

 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Even if it tracks a touch north of us it’s still a cyclonic flow with lots of clouds/snow showers/flurries. So yeah, unless it tracks way north, I’d still feel decent about many getting first flakes. I’m not talking accumulations. We’d need it tracking south of us to really talk about accumulating snow outside the upslope spots. 

i think his intentions are buckin' for 'saving' his dystopian drought fantasy - not snow this time...   lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

it's been rarefying, sure tho. 

correction to what Kevin just said... I did not 'make a call' for a 'big nor'easter'   - i made a generic implication interpretation of where those particular ensemble means appear to be trending. 

this is how the trump supporters create their fake realities and then believe in them.   someone prevaricates an interpretation, ...then, their audience, being of cutting edge sharp intellectual pedigree rural red origin ... they go ahead and 'analyze' what's said and shockingly, can't come up with any reason to question it.   budda boom budda bing ... alternative reality is painted and the hapless contingent of morons are thusly guidance by an illusion

 

Like this?

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

You could certainly be correct on that.  
 

At some point though something will put an end to this 3 month long pattern. 

i know what you mean .. but just sayn'   the "pattern" is highly likely to change. 

it may be transient and short lived... but, that is about as high on a statistical chi test for verification potential as is physically possible in modern technology with that west -nao block and deep trough running underneath.  

it's a matter of ironing out the details.   

see ... some times, you can be more certain about a mid or even extended range look.   this thing we're looking at with the north american set up was sniffed out 12 days ago actually, by pure index interpretation alone - i know..  i wrote about it.   and well, ... here we are, the operational runs emerged into that correlation.   that behavior alone is typically a higher confidence predictor.  etc...

it's when we're flying along with nothing to look at and no leading indicators, and then all the sudden ... d9 has a bomb that lasts for 3 days of guidance - but uh uh uh ... d5 it disappears. that was never a higher confidence - ... there's all kinds of examples in either direction.   the good fellas know which ones are which

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

it's been rarefying, sure tho. 

correction to what Kevin just said... I did not 'make a call' for a 'big nor'easter'   - i made a generic implication interpretation of where those particular ensemble means appear to be trending. 

this is how the trump supporters create their fake realities and then believe in them.   someone prevaricates an interpretation, ...then, their audience, being of cutting edge sharp intellectual pedigree rural red origin ... they go ahead and 'analyze' what's said and shockingly, can't come up with any reason to question it.   budda boom budda bing ... alternative reality is painted and the hapless contingent of morons are thusly guidance by an illusion

 

This is completely uncalled for.  I’m one of those supporters, and I don’t appreciate that.  Whether you like it or not, America spoke…LOUD N CLEAR. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

This is completely uncalled for.  I’m one of those supporters, and I don’t appreciate that.  Whether you like it or not, America spoke…LOUD N CLEAR. 

it was directed at kevin, because he attempted to spin what i said into a false impression/implication - and the twaddle that is out on social media that is consummately revealed by the trump supporter constituency as though it were fact, is preposterous dude.  sorry, it is -

as far as the other, america made a mistake - that can happen. 

and by the way... global warming is real, and it will cost humanity in increasing morality and destruction.  it is so real in fact, that many present day natural disasters can be mathematically ( you are school teacher - you should understand the incontrovertible aspect of math proof ) connected to wildly changing climate.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

This is completely uncalled for.  I’m one of those supporters, and I don’t appreciate that.  Whether you like it or not, America spoke…LOUD N CLEAR. 

Could this bit of news be influencing your opinion?

https://apnews.com/article/gray-wolves-protections-biden-trump-81084b1bba499d444950f8294880c524

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

it was directed at kevin, because he attempted to spin what i said into a false impression/implication - and the twaddle that is out on social media that is consummately revealed by the trump supporter constituency as though it were fact, is preposterous dude.  sorry, it is -

as far as the other, america made a mistake - that can happen. 

No mistake there.  It’s a correction.  But we’ll leave it at that. I’m here to discuss the weather…nothing more. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...