Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

Major Hurricane Helene


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, dan11295 said:

VDM supports 963 mb,, though the 8 am advisory is 960 mb. brief opening of the W eyewall may have halted intensification temporarily. 

Agreed and was initially confused about the 960. However, I realized they're dropping two drones in the eye on this mission. Perhaps the drone is providing in-situ observations and that's where they got that. Otherwise, idk either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Its going to need to ramp up pretty quickly from here on out or the worse case scenario with respect to surge may not play out, regardless.....even a last moment intensificaiton may not have time to gather as much surge, though the shelf is pretty shallow in the big bend region...

It's ramping up now. Large CDO structure developing and wrapping around 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to see the overnight developments. Sort of gone from potentially horrible to just very bad.

TLH and ATL being on the west side of the storms a big deal. 

It's current track through GA takes through alot more of the least populated areas.

Still planning to sleep in the basement Thursday night given all the trees around us.

Doesn't look like it is going to blow up to quite as huge as monster as was being modeled last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RamblinRed said:

Happy to see the overnight developments. Sort of gone from potentially horrible to just very bad.

TLH and ATL being on the west side of the storms a big deal. 

It's current track through GA takes through alot more of the least populated areas.

Still planning to sleep in the basement Thursday night given all the trees around us.

Doesn't look like it is going to blow up to quite as huge as monster as was being modeled last night.

It’s good that it seems to be targeting the least populated area it can but hopefully it stays far enough away from Tampa to not make that situation worse. The flooding impacts inland though are baked in no matter what it does at this point. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Right......the implication is that we aren't behind schedule much.....if it reamined stagnant today, then its time to adjust. The envt. never looked optimal yeseterday and last night.

 

7 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

The doppler velocity image is telling. Those areas well east of center will get whacked real good.

One of the main differences from a few days ago is that the hurricane intensity models really peak this as it’s making landfall. That has its own implications if correct with regard to mixing winds down, but those models really crank the east side while only making the wind field more symmetrical this afternoon and evening. 
 

HWRF as an example, even if a bit overdone, I’m looking at structure here. 

cm0ycXj.png
 

ybCiiq2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

One of the main differences from a few days ago is that the hurricane intensity models really peak this as it’s making landfall. That has its own implications if correct with regard to mixing winds down, but those models really crank the east side while only making the wind field more symmetrical this afternoon and evening. 
 

HWRF as an example, even if a bit overdone, I’m looking at structure here. 

cm0ycXj.png
 

ybCiiq2.png

It's also why I am more concerned with interior SC and NC. This is going to be a good hit there wind wise. CLT may gust higher than ATL to be honest.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I don't think the timing of the cycle of internal processes bodes well for FL....they need to pray this never quite gets its act together. I said when it interacted with Yucatan that any chance of a prelandfall EWRC was out the window.

Yes, that is some thing I have been noting...maybe not in terms of maxamizing surge, but otherwise the system will probably be more impactful than had it pulled a Katrina out over the loop current. Sure, there would be an internet-ogling-orgy from all of us weather dorks, but this is the more precarious scenario in terms of maxamizing the wind threat IMO.

11 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

One of the main differences from a few days ago is that the hurricane intensity models really peak this as it’s making landfall. That has its own implications if correct with regard to mixing winds down, but those models really crank the east side while only making the wind field more symmetrical this afternoon and evening. 
 

HWRF as an example, even if a bit overdone, I’m looking at structure here. 

cm0ycXj.png
 

ybCiiq2.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

All the gravity waves radiating out on first vis are indicative of intensification picking up now too. 
IMG_5606.thumb.jpeg.13a00ffd43955da13c49730e8875b1db.jpeg

Solar min doing it's work. I wonder if the storm will maintain some level of asymmetry through landfall. Large systems have a hard time mixing out dry air entirely sometimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So maybe not now, but at some point we're going to have to talk about these spaghetti models and their "corrected" tracks.

This is yesterday's 18z map -- just 30-36 hours from landfall.

Half of these solutions are outside of the 8 a.m. cone!

All except one are west of the current trackline.

Questions:

Why were the spaghetti plots so much farther west than the operational runs and even the ensembles?

Why did the NHC defer so strongly to the spaghetti maps?

What am I missing?

spathetti crap.png

  • Like 4
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, beanskip said:

So maybe not now, but at some point we're going to have to talk about these spaghetti models and their "corrected" tracks.

This is yesterday's 18z map -- just 30-36 hours from landfall.

Half of these solutions are outside of the 8 a.m. cone!

All except one are west of the current trackline.

Questions:

Why were the spaghetti plots so much farther west than the operational runs and even the ensembles?

Why did the NHC defer so strongly to the spaghetti maps?

What am I missing?

spathetti crap.png

This was all explained yesterday. Hasn't the track only moved like 20 miles east? 

The nhc uses the corrected models because it's the best tools we have. What else do you want them to use? 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said:

This was all explained yesterday. Hasn't the track only moved like 20 miles east? 

The nhc uses the corrected models because it's the best tools we have. What else do you want them to use? 

 

I've been tracking storms for 30 years. The operational Euro has always ruled the roost, not these spaghetti plots.

When did that change?

Why are the spaghetti plots so out of line with all the operational runs?

You said before the tropical models were driving this, but they are also now on the far eastern edge of the cone and have trended east a lot more than 20 miles. 

The NHC track is surely going to keep moving east at 11 and when it does, ALL of the 18z spaghetti tracks will either be west of the center track and/or completely out of the cone.

The above points haven't been explained AT ALL. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
  • Weenie 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...