Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,577
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    BlueSkyGA
    Newest Member
    BlueSkyGA
    Joined

Major Hurricane Helene


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, andyhb said:

New HWRF is, for lack of a better term, a complete disaster. Makes landfall as a very large/high end Cat 4, takes it over Tallahassee, and then remains sub-960 mb into N GA with gusts that would probably exceed 90 mph over a large area (along with the flooding in the Appalachians).

How likely do you think that is? I mean it does have Loop Current and great atmospheric conditions tonight. We saw what Ian did overnight even after crossing western Cuba. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, andyhb said:

New HWRF is, for lack of a better term, a complete disaster. Makes landfall as a very large/high end Cat 4, takes it over Tallahassee, and then remains sub-960 mb into N GA with gusts that would probably exceed 90 mph over a large area (along with the flooding in the Appalachians).

Considering that the record low SLP for N GA is in the 970s, I’m assuming this is likely way overdone. I sure hope that’s the case. But you never know for sure as this is a very unique situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GaWx said:

Considering that the record low SLP for N GA is  in the 970s, I’m assuming this is likely way overdone. But you never know for sure.

Considering the storm makes landfall at sub 920 mb and is moving quite fast, this would be the worst case scenario for GA. Think Michael but larger.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Atlanta and Tallahassee it will really come down to track. NHC track is bad, but it would not shock me if we get some east ticks. So for Atlanta, if it moves east of the city, winds on the west side will be strong, but 40-55 vs 75+ is a huge difference. The inv trough that starts to set up after Helene makes landfall will help keep the LLJ on east side of the low. So we are talking massive differences in wind at both locations depending on track.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Wannabehippie said:

Plus it is very close to the Yucatan, that has to be causing some issues with strengthening IMHO as an amateur.

 

This area has cooler water due to more upwelling due to westerly winds. This is what I posted in the Beryl thread. The area extends a bit east of the peninsula and north of it. Throw in some dry air with this and you don't get a lot of deepening. 

 

The coastal area north of Yucatan has experienced a cooling SST trend from 1982 to 2015 during the upwelling season (May–September) that contrasts with the warming observed at the adjacent ocean area. Different drivers were analyzed to identify the possible causes of that unusual coastal cooling. Changes in coastal upwelling and in sea-atmosphere heat fluxes are not consistent with the observed coastal cooling. The eastward shift of the Yucatan Current observed over the last decades is hypothesized as the most probable cause of coastal cooling. This shift enhances the vertical transport of cold deeper water to the continental shelf from where it is pumped to the surface by upwelling favorable westerly winds.

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924796317303317#:~:text=The eastward shift of the,by upwelling favorable westerly winds.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

For Atlanta and Tallahassee it will really come down to track. NHC track is bad, but it would not shock me if we get some east ticks. So for Atlanta, if it moves east of the city, winds on the west side will be strong, but 40-55 vs 75+ is a huge difference. The inv trough that starts to set up after Helene makes landfall will help keep the LLJ on east side of the low. So we are talking massive differences in wind at both locations depending on track.

Direction is big too.  Due N-S winds are rare in ATL, the airport does not even have a N-S RWY much like DFW/DAL do not often see strong W-WSW winds so tree roots are likely not going to be able to handle 45-55 from 160-180 as well as they could 040-080.  60 plus forget it.  Georgia had real severe damage from Zeta despite winds being S-SW due to the fact the direction was rare.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Radtechwxman said:

How likely do you think that is? I mean it does have Loop Current and great atmospheric conditions tonight. We saw what Ian did overnight even after crossing western Cuba. 

Would be dependent on it mixing out dry air and completing its inner core by tonight/early tomorrow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, andyhb said:

Considering the storm makes landfall at sub 920 mb and is moving quite fast, this would be the worst case scenario for GA. Think Michael but larger.

 Yeah, I realize that the very large size and very high speed of movement are coming into play to unfortunately minimize how much the winds will come down/SLP rise by the time it gets to N GA (only ~9 hrs later) . I calculated an avg speed of ~28 mph from landfall to N GA, one of the fastest on record for a MH hitting the FL panhandle and moving N. (Eloise of 1975 was ~29). But my hope is that its 920 SLP is way overdone. With it being a very large storm, I’d think it would be difficult for it to get down to 920. Wouldn’t 940 mb be more reasonable considering its size and somewhat limited amount of time before landfall? Also, it temporarily has leveled off.

 If it is instead 940 mb, perhaps 20 mb could be added to the sub 960 prog for N GA and make it 970s though that would still be very bad and near records.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

For Atlanta and Tallahassee it will really come down to track. NHC track is bad, but it would not shock me if we get some east ticks. So for Atlanta, if it moves east of the city, winds on the west side will be strong, but 40-55 vs 75+ is a huge difference. The inv trough that starts to set up after Helene makes landfall will help keep the LLJ on east side of the low. So we are talking massive differences in wind at both locations depending on track.

Yeah, there is not a lot of model support for a track west of here like NHC has. Really hoping it tracks east since I have a full canopy of 150’ trees overhead. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some good news: If Helene's eyewall with major hurricane winds strikes an area like Dog Island, it is a very, very unpopulated region. In fact, if you were going to have a major hurricane strike the Gulf Coast of the United States in the 21st century, this is one of the areas that would likely have the least amount of damage and population on the coastline.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GaWx said:

 Yeah, I realize that the very large size and very high speed of movement are coming into play to unfortunately minimize how much the winds will come down/SLP rise by the time it gets to N GA (only ~9 hrs later) . I calculated an avg speed of ~28 mph from landfall to N GA, one of the fastest on record for a MH hitting the FL panhandle and moving N. (Eloise of 1975 was ~29). But my hope is that its 920 SLP is way overdone. With it being a very large storm, I’d think it would be difficult for it to get down to 920. Wouldn’t 940 mb be more reasonable considering its size and somewhat limited amount of time before landfall? Also, it temporarily has leveled off.

Given what we’re seeing from the hurricane models, and the consistency once it was projected that the center wouldn’t cross the Yucatán land mass, I think they’re absolutely worth taking seriously.

That said, how the storm reacts to the pressure fall is key. I think it’s more likely that pressure is very low and the RMW is larger with lower peak winds (still could be car 3/4 to be sure) than it’s an enormous storm with an enormous ring of 125kt winds in addition. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many models show some horrific rotting band somewhere near transylvania county. NHC starting to show some 20" plus stuff there. Obviously the details of where it sets up are up in the air, but those are astonishing totals for an area that broadly is at massive flood risk in general (i.e.20%+ of properties at risk)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 This is a quote from someone at another BB because he worded it so well:

“It's bonkers that the NHC track seems to be discounting all of the global models further eastward movement. Not even a mention in any of the discussions. 

If the NHC nails this track as usual, I'll never doubt them again.”

  Opinions?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Radtechwxman said:

Curious what impact this dry air wrapping into circulation now will have on Helene. Can really see it eroding clouds on visible satellite wrapping into the COC. Could lower ceiling a bit if it takes a while to mix out. 

image.gif.e545dec0e760ddda52e215824859a6df.gif

Looks like Helene will close off a much smaller eye than that huge one it attempted last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxWatcher007 changed the title to Major Hurricane Helene

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...