Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,600
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Stormlover74 said:

Nam is fairly wet now. 3knam not as wet but still has something unlike last week

I'd settle for .25" 

RGEM looks decent too, giving a lot of the area close to a half inch. We're not gonna get the big soaking that we want to end the dry spell, but hopefully it will be enough to give things a decent watering. I'd be happy with .25" to .50". 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, winterwx21 said:

RGEM looks decent too, giving a lot of the area close to a half inch. We're not gonna get the big soaking that we want to end the dry spell, but hopefully it will be enough to give things a decent watering. I'd be happy with .25" to .50". 

12z Cmc looks good west of city and especially gfs areawide

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psv88 said:

How have forecasts gotten worse as technology has advanced?

Good question.  I will assume the science will argue otherwise.  Of course, when I was banging, there were only 2 models.  Now, perhaps, there are too many models?  Several have known biases.  There are more, and better short term precipitation forecastng tools.  It seems some models, which have had good sucess have been reconfigured and have become less accurate?  We have ensembles, that are usually the most reliable tool.  However, we still see enough short term temperature and precipitation busts that invoke doubt, and forget anything over 4 days.  Long range is still unachievable ( or at least no better than using historical comparisons)?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dark Star said:

Good question.  I will assume the science will argue otherwise.  Of course, when I was banging, there were only 2 models.  Now, perhaps, there are too many models?  Several have known biases.  There are more, and better short term precipitation forecastng tools.  It seems some models, which have had good sucess have been reconfigured and have become less accurate?  We have ensembles, that are usually the most reliable tool.  However, we still see enough short term temperature and precipitation busts that invoke doubt, and forget anything over 4 days.  Long range is still unachievable ( or at least no better than using historical comparisons)?

Good afternoon Dark Star. I can only agree, as stated. Considering your third sentence, l have to admire, if not envy, your early days. As always …..

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...