Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chimoss
    Newest Member
    Chimoss
    Joined

August "Ughust" 2024 Obs/Disco


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Ehhh the signals were there for a lot of rain. Mentioned that Friday but everyone was too busy worried about a fake tropical threat and the colors of 8-14D WPC maps

Eh. Nws had .1-.25 as of 10am this morning with locally more in t storms. I guess locally stretches that range to 10”….

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Eh. Nws had .1-.25 as of 10am this morning with locally more in t storms. I guess locally stretches that range to 10”….

I didn't read any discussions or forecasts for today/tomorrow so not sure what the communication on it was. Granted I didn't look heavily myself but on Friday I thought the signals were there for "alot of rain". But these events are extremely challenging to forecast. I am not sure if you can even really forecast something like (especially to pin-point locally) this well in-advance just because of the mesoscale factors that tend to be in play. I mean how can you really pin-point exactly where training will occur, what rates will be, and the duration of those rates? Similar with winter storms...can be impossible to figure out exactly where that narrow band of intense snow/totals will occur until you see the pieces lining up. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Modfan2 said:

So, what are the dynamics causing this? Doesn’t seem that humid and wouldn’t think a cold front would dump this much rain? 

Go the SPC meso analysis page and scroll through the upper air section and the heavy rainfall section... deep-layered southerly flow with high values of  precipitable water converging into southwest and southern CT on into parts of central CT... Note the Precipitation potential placement image...

image.thumb.png.4f865ed3d37e664799c72f2cb1b2b7b0.png

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

I didn't read any discussions or forecasts for today/tomorrow so not sure what the communication on it was. Granted I didn't look heavily myself but on Friday I thought the signals were there for "alot of rain". But these events are extremely challenging to forecast. I am not sure if you can even really forecast something like (especially to pin-point locally) this well in-advance just because of the mesoscale factors that tend to be in play. I mean how can you really pin-point exactly where training will occur, what rates will be, and the duration of those rates? Similar with winter storms...can be impossible to figure out exactly where that narrow band of intense snow/totals will occur until you see the pieces lining up. 

I get that At a high level but we’ve had flood watches that fail from synoptics events while today is causing loss of property and life without a single word of potential flooding before the rain got going. Not one. I’m not blaming them but to act like this isnt a public bust for a fairly populated zone is also being disingenuous.  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

I get that At a high level but we’ve had flood watches that fail from synoptics events while today is causing loss of property and life without a single word of potential flooding before the rain got going. Not one. I’m not blaming them but to act like this isnt a public bust for a fairly populated zone is also being disingenuous.  

I think there have been some discussions in the past on here about flood watches and communication on potential for flooding. I totally get what you're saying. We often see flood watches and here about potential for flooding but 99.999% of the time its really just some poor drainage flooding or a handful of roads with ponding. 

I think how flooding potential is communicated (prior and during) needs to be heavily revisited. Flood watches/flash flood watches get tossed around way too much and there really is no discriminator between something that may be extremely localized to something which may be more widespread. Even for convective you have PDS wording to discriminate between higher end potential. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Look at the stuff coming up south of LI ti merge with the CT rains. Long night ahead 

 

8 minutes ago, FXWX said:

Go the SPC meso analysis page and scroll through the upper air section and the heavy rainfall section... deep-layered southerly flow with high values of  precipitable water converging into southwest and southern CT on into parts of central CT... Note the Precipitation potential placement image...

image.thumb.png.4f865ed3d37e664799c72f2cb1b2b7b0.png

 

Not sure what’s going to happen here, but I’m definitely watching what’s coming up from the Sound. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Yes sir. And who needs Ernesto…we got our own massive rain event happening out of pretty much nowhere today.  

Yup.  Probably wouldn't get this much water with Ernie anyway. Our cars and chicken coops may have washed away, but we still have our homes. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...