Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

April 2024


 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, MANDA said:

Same here.  Pretty intense.  Light fixtures were swinging and dishes were rattling.  When it was over almost all the pictures in the house were noticeably crooked.  It all started with a loud sonic boom type of a sound.

a building in Newark deemed unsafe and also cracks visible in driveways and on the roads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gravitylover said:

Go away ;)

 

I had a much longer affect, 20 seconds easily starting with a bang then up and down with a lateral feel to it. Rattling windows and pictures on the outside walls. I was in the stone sunroom that sits on bedrock so it was probably amplified somewhat compared to a home on a slab over soil. The best part was the sound. It was like a huge helicopter directly overhead and it made my knees quiver. Cool shit. 

somewhat more powerful than an eclipse ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JetsPens87 said:

I know absolute donkey squat about earthquakes other than a core geology class that maybe had a 10 minute section on it.

Above ground = meteorology 

Below ground = geology

Maybe one of these days we'll have computer models that predict when and where earthquakes have a higher chance of occurring.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, coastalplainsnowman said:

Honest question - is there anything in a meteorologist's training that would make them particularly knowledgable about earthquakes?  I ask because most of the on air folks I'm watching today seem to be struggling.  Granted, they're being asked to make a story out of something which, other than some shaking and the novelty of it, is a not much of a story, but some of it is frankly tough to watch.  

Nerds know nerdy things, other than that, no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, coastalplainsnowman said:

Honest question - is there anything in a meteorologist's training that would make them particularly knowledgable about earthquakes?  I ask because most of the on air folks I'm watching today seem to be struggling.  Granted, they're being asked to make a story out of something which, other than some shaking and the novelty of it, is a not much of a story, but some of it is frankly tough to watch.  

Meteorology and seismology share some common ground, yet they represent distinct scientific disciplines. I suspect producers may assume all scientists are interchangeable, but in reality, understanding seismology requires independent study. While an atmospheric scientist might manage to gather basic knowledge through quick research, a deeper understanding typically necessitates dedicated study.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

4.0 magnitude in the same spot

At least it looks like the main event was this morning and that these are aftershocks, rather than foreshocks (admittedly much more rare). That, or the US has taken North Koreas idea and began underground testing :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, USCG RS said:

At least it looks like the main event was this morning and that these are aftershocks, rather than foreshocks (admittedly much more rare). That, or the US has taken North Koreas idea and began underground testing :rolleyes:


I hope these aren’t foreshocks.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...