Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,563
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Billy Chaos
    Newest Member
    Billy Chaos
    Joined

Winter 2024-2025 DISC


 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, 512high said:

Ray, maybe a page or so back, didn't you mention December looks good, "January" looks ugly, Feb-Mar look great after reloading? Unless new data your seeing vs a few weeks ago? 

I never said Feb and March look great. I said maybe blocking tries in March. The NAO should average Positive in January, but there could be some carry over from December. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, snowman19 said:

Webb completely blew last winter and the winter before. And he was arrogant, nasty and condescending as hell about it. All of the research papers he posted last winter didn’t help his monumental bust on February and March. He was so sure of it too. Absolutely confident in a huge Feb and Mar and was mocking everyone who doubted him like they were stupid. Back in 2022, he completely blew December. Guaranteed a historic I-95 KU, quoted study after study proving how right he was going to be. Then he went on to blow January when he was sure a +TNH pattern was going to set up. He never humbles

I'm just getting a rise out of you. I don't see a -NAO in the seasonal mean or an east based event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2024 at 8:03 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The only ugly month I see on the CANSIPS is January....reloads for Feb and March after a nice December. But even January doesn't lose the Poleward SAleutian ridging, so while shitty in the mean, I bet that is still a nice week mixed in there.

Ray this is what I was looking at back Aug. 26th, ,,,,today you say a toaster bath for February, on the 26th of August you mentioned reloads for Feb and March, when you use the term "reload"I assume favorable. That's what I 'am trying to articulate if you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 512high said:

Ray this is what I was looking at back Aug. 26th, ,,,,today you say a toaster bath for February, on the 26th of August you mentioned reloads for Feb and March, when you use the term "reload"I assume favorable. That's what I 'am trying to articulate if you will.

I was describing that model output...nothing more.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

How does the historic +NAO that we’ve seen this summer factor into your winter thoughts, if at all?

I don't weight it too much per se, but @Stormchaserchuck1's NAO formula was pretty dead nuts on the mean of my polar analogs as of a few weeks ago...though I think this has gotten more positive. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I don't weight it too much per se, but @Stormchaserchuck1's NAO formula was pretty dead nuts on the mean of my polar analogs as of a few weeks ago...though I think this has gotten more positive. 

I'll have to do an updated analysis this week.. I think it's coming in around 0.65-0.70 for DJFM

Nice write up on here by the way. It was a good read. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2024 at 10:04 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I don't weight it too much per se, but @Stormchaserchuck1's NAO formula was pretty dead nuts on the mean of my polar analogs as of a few weeks ago...though I think this has gotten more positive. 

We are +0.50 right now for DJFM (with 0.54 sd, 50% chance DJFM NAO comes in -0.04 to +1.04). A little less positive than I expected. In May we had a negative reading, so the warm pool later in the year has only been a part of the total measurement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

We are +0.50 right now for DJFM (with 0.54 sd, 50% chance DJFM NAO comes in -0.04 to +1.04). A little less positive than I expected. In May we had a negative reading, so the warm pool later in the year has only been a part of the total measurement. 

Still in line with my thoughts....excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2024 at 3:22 PM, snowman19 said:

Webb completely blew last winter and the winter before. And he was arrogant, nasty and condescending as hell about it. All of the research papers he posted last winter didn’t help his monumental bust on February and March. He was so sure of it too. Absolutely confident in a huge Feb and Mar and was mocking everyone who doubted him like they were stupid. Back in 2022, he completely blew December. Guaranteed a historic I-95 KU, quoted study after study proving how right he was going to be. Then he went on to blow January when he was sure a +TNH pattern was going to set up. He never humbles

Pretty much sums up all the X weatherman in the age range of 25-35 who just graduated college or grad school and think they know it all.  All are smug and condescending and block happy if you question them, even in a respectful way.  Webb blocked me for asking him to describe what went wrong.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...