Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Winter 2024-2025 DISC


 Share

Recommended Posts

I have to send a follow up email to PSL but a few months back the site I was using to make composites compared to the appropriate period stopped generating images. When I initially emailed them they said they were looking into it. This happened just before everything happened with the dog and just haven't followed up. 

I had some new ideas I wanted to try with the breakdowns based on ENSO/strength but have fallen really behind. I wish I either had significantly more time or was smart enough to learn programming and coding...that right there would go a long way in all this. But I wanted to start assessing previous ENSO events and pattern evolution on a weekly basis starting from like mid-Fall. What's becoming very challenging with using ENSO in seasonal forecasting though is, focusing on ONI and SST's alone just aren't cutting it anymore. ENSO events and how they are impacting atmospheric circulations are behaving much differently over the last 20-30 years. Obviously there needs to be some skepticism with that statement because when assessing events prior to 1950 much of the data is re-analysis and derived from ship data and there are huge gaps in data during the 2 world wars. 

But what I re-started back in the spring was creating a list of ENSO events for each of the following methods

ONI 

ENS-ONI

RONI

I was then looking into SOI data and assessing the SOI and looking at SOI data for the following methods 

SOI from the Bureau of Meteorology (Australia)  

SOI from the University of East Anglia 

SOI from Long Paddock 

CPC SOI 

CPC Equatorial SOI 

The methods used to calculate the SOI are extremely similar, however, Long Paddock/Australia used a x10 multiplier and Long Paddock also uses a bit longer climo background. I think Long Paddock/Australia's method makes SOI assessment much easier. 

Then next looking into MEI. What sucks with MEI is v2 only dates to 1979. There is the extended version which dates to like the 1870's but I believe it stopped being updated in the 2000's. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I have to send a follow up email to PSL but a few months back the site I was using to make composites compared to the appropriate period stopped generating images. When I initially emailed them they said they were looking into it. This happened just before everything happened with the dog and just haven't followed up. 

I had some new ideas I wanted to try with the breakdowns based on ENSO/strength but have fallen really behind. I wish I either had significantly more time or was smart enough to learn programming and coding...that right there would go a long way in all this. But I wanted to start assessing previous ENSO events and pattern evolution on a weekly basis starting from like mid-Fall. What's becoming very challenging with using ENSO in seasonal forecasting though is, focusing on ONI and SST's alone just aren't cutting it anymore. ENSO events and how they are impacting atmospheric circulations are behaving much differently over the last 20-30 years. Obviously there needs to be some skepticism with that statement because when assessing events prior to 1950 much of the data is re-analysis and derived from ship data and there are huge gaps in data during the 2 world wars. 

But what I re-started back in the spring was creating a list of ENSO events for each of the following methods

ONI 

ENS-ONI

RONI

I was then looking into SOI data and assessing the SOI and looking at SOI data for the following methods 

SOI from the Bureau of Meteorology (Australia)  

SOI from the University of East Anglia 

SOI from Long Paddock 

CPC SOI 

CPC Equatorial SOI 

The methods used to calculate the SOI are extremely similar, however, Long Paddock/Australia used a x10 multiplier and Long Paddock also uses a bit longer climo background. I think Long Paddock/Australia's method makes SOI assessment much easier. 

Then next looking into MEI. What sucks with MEI is v2 only dates to 1979. There is the extended version which dates to like the 1870's but I believe it stopped being updated in the 2000's. 

 

The 1951-2010 composite site is back up.

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/atmoswrit/map/index.html

However, they still haven't update the temp/precip plots to include 9/2024.

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/usclimdivs/

Here is the old MEI data:

https://www.webberweather.com/multivariate-enso-index.html

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I just meant "party" as in +PNA...probably should have worded that better. I just mean latitude will be probably be needed more in February than January. Obviously this is all just specualtion based on some preliminary stuff.

Gotcha!  And it Makes sense. :thumbsup:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The 1951-2010 composite site is back up.

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/atmoswrit/map/index.html

However, they still haven't update the temp/precip plots to include 9/2024.

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/usclimdivs/

Here is the old MEI data:

https://www.webberweather.com/multivariate-enso-index.html

 

I wish they added more blocks for the number of years you can input. I know with the temp maps on the climate division site you posted they increased the blocks from 20 to 30. 

I know you mainly focus on ENSO events post 1950 while I was going back to 1900, however, I am beginning to wonder if I should put any weight on forecasts using events prior to 1950. I don't want to abandoned studying patterns of ENSO events prior to 1950 but it is evident as daylight there is a major shift in how ENSO's behave over time...especially after the 1960's/1970's. 

For example, I stupidly went below-average temps for like the eastern third of the country last winter...but if I eliminated EL NIno events from before 1960 from my list, I probably wouldn't have done that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DavisStraight said:

How were the last two years up North?

Variable.  Apparently, the Maine foothills did as well as any.

Site            BGR      CAR   Rangeley   Hartford**   MBY

Avg SN*    73.9      120.2      120.9        105.5       89.0
22-23        72.6      133.4        92.0        119.2      101.2
23-24        45.5       88.2        93.8        109.6       99.0

*   1991-2020 norms for the first 3, 1998-99 onward (total records) averages for the other 2.
**  Hartford Maine lies in the Sumner Hills of central Oxford County.  It's 26 miles SW from my place and 310 feet higher in elevation, a good snow catcher.

Biggest foothills "catches" compared to the other sites' snowfall were 20-27"+ on Dec 16-18, 2022, 20-24"+ Mar 23-24, 2024, and 14-20" Apr 4-6, 2024.
Hartford had a total of 68.3" from those 3 storms; my share was "only" 57.9".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DavisStraight said:

How were the last two years up North?

Using the Mansfield Snow Stake (Stowe,VT) as a proxy...last three years. 

  • 2021-2022 was a challenging year throughout
  • 2022-2023 struggled for most of the winter, yet rallied with some late season (albeit short lived) magic
  • 2023-204 followed a similar path, pockets of decent storms followed by snowmelt below average, with March delivering a short lived season ending snowfall bump.

HistoricalSnowfall(VT).png

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WinterWolf said:

Last year was bad.
 

 22-23 was pretty good. Was riding on great trails on April 2nd 2023.  They had a huge March in ‘23 in Northern Aroostook.  Put the icing on the season. 

Yes, (31.5" for last season, year before about 42") but shit , I hope it's NOT a repeat like last season, just would like an "average" winter, we shall see....no control over it that's for sure!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2024 at 5:04 PM, CCHurricane said:

Using the Mansfield Snow Stake (Stowe,VT) as a proxy...last three years. 

  • 2021-2022 was a challenging year throughout
  • 2022-2023 struggled for most of the winter, yet rallied with some late season (albeit short lived) magic
  • 2023-204 followed a similar path, pockets of decent storms followed by snowmelt below average, with March delivering a short lived season ending snowfall bump.

HistoricalSnowfall(VT).png

The Mansfield stake data is so important to me and your post shows why it’s such a great data set.  It’s a simple data set that really works to show different winters’ characteristics.

In 1954 some dude put a tall piece of wood against a tree to measure the snowpack that season… and 70-years later here we are still recording the snow depth on that piece of wood.

Anytime the NOAA camera goes out up there, we (at the ski operations) will make sure to get up there.  So much so, we will skin/hike up the hill to get readings if the lifts aren’t running.

I think the crowd sourcing and local dedication to that data point is awesome.  If NWS is looking for a reading, the community gets it with a photo for verification.  Someone out there will pass by it, on foot or snowcat/snowmobile.  We pass it along to BTV to keep the record going.

But most readings are done from a camera the local NWS set up.  The fact the BTV office has put so much money and energy into technology to continue the readings remotely is a testament to its novelty.  4kft elevation snowpack numbers for 70 years and counting. The period of record at that elevation is what makes it “the fabled stake.”

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CPC seasonal probabilities (these maps shouldn’t be called “outlooks”) out today.

A lean towards above normal and moist relative to normal.  No big risk taking there.

That’s the safe play recently… lean AN in temperatures and those positive departures usually come with some moisture in the cold season.

IMG_0751.thumb.jpeg.147b64d3d46bd01083ba9753abfc44d4.jpeg
IMG_0752.thumb.jpeg.86b2fd7253226185fd3fd9d9e6ffcc1f.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The temp and precip anomaly plotting tool should be updated to include September 2024 soon...they are having some technical issues.

 
Fri, Sep 20 at 9:25 AM
 
 

Hi

Thanks for emailing. We are having unusual technical issues updating the dataset this month. We hope to have it updated soon.

Cathy Smith

answering for PSL data

Show original message

@weatherwiz

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2024 at 10:17 PM, powderfreak said:

CPC seasonal probabilities (these maps shouldn’t be called “outlooks”) out today.

A lean towards above normal and moist relative to normal.  No big risk taking there.

That’s the safe play recently… lean AN in temperatures and those positive departures usually come with some moisture in the cold season.

IMG_0751.thumb.jpeg.147b64d3d46bd01083ba9753abfc44d4.jpeg
IMG_0752.thumb.jpeg.86b2fd7253226185fd3fd9d9e6ffcc1f.jpeg

High probability of a stout AK vortex though. I’m leaning towards another BN snow season for SNE. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

gfs (and now ggem, 12z) with the first synoptic air type of the season by the end of the first week of october ...  45 days ahead of schedule - a recurring motif of autumns since 2000..   some years more so than others.

but its why for snow has been seen down to 40 n nearly half the octobers since 2000 - or whatever the incident recurrence has been but way above the 1950 to 2000 norm

but, it's likely by some 20% that these guidances are too amped with cold weight and trough depths at this range, anyway, but this is officially the demarcation time for this modeling year, that the models start catfishing winter enthusiasts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...