Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

A wintry event likely I84 corridor Fri Feb 23 may involve small portions of the NYC subforum with some snow accumulation.


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Different than the refresher powdery event of Sat Feb 17, and this past Tuesdays Feb 13 wetter snowstorm, it still has possibilities for adding to our winter snow totals with modeled "potential" for half a foot or more for the I84 corridor inclusive of the Poconos-extreme nw NJ interior sections se NYS-CT.  

Possibilities even exist for an inch or four down to I95 and NYC though for now, odds are less.

This could be one warmer more rainy event the 22nd and then a following rapidly intensifying coastal storm Fri-Sat the 23rd-24th.

As generally usual higher terrain-inland best chance for snow.

A strong short wave in the eastern Pacific this weekend will move through the southwest USA early this coming week and probably be ingested into a series of northern stream Canadian short eaves that dive southeast into Midwest and form a sharp amplifying trough over the northeast USA by next weekend.  

Details tbd. This probably will be of NYC subforum interest for some of us the next few days as winter potential refuses to go away. 

Added 10 to 1 SLR, 24 hour 00z/17 global ensembles and the NWS 04z/17 very low chance 3+" snow D6-7, to look back upon when whatever transpires. 

Title tightening up and downgrade update at 537AM/20.

Screen Shot 2024-02-17 at 4.35.33 AM.png

Screen Shot 2024-02-17 at 4.36.47 AM.png

Screen Shot 2024-02-17 at 4.37.38 AM.png

Screen Shot 2024-02-17 at 4.40.21 AM.png

Screen Shot 2024-02-17 at 4.41.34 AM.png

 

Verification attached for a failed event-  useless thread. Numerous traces of sleet -snow-rain mix I84 into NNJ 3P/22-9A/23 but modeled short waves remained separate with one tracking across se Canada and the other actually trailed and dropped down through the Carolines. Was over early per the poster comments. 

Screen Shot 2024-02-24 at 9.23.46 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-02-24 at 9.24.09 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-02-24 at 9.26.29 PM.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

Euro is weak and warm. Need the northern stream to dig.

 

Nothing shows a favorable storm . Might be done for snow until March maybe.

Yeah next week isn't looking great. I'm not great at this stuff, so was wondering what others were seeing that I wasn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

Nothing is likely a week out. We have seen countless times this winter how awful the models have been.

Yup, the last 2 storms were misses by the models and in some cases really bad misses. 

And I wasn't saying that it's likely and I84 storm, just saying what the title reads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Irish said:

Yup, the last 2 storms were misses by the models and in some cases really bad misses. 

And I wasn't saying that it's likely and I84 storm, just saying what the title reads. 

models are all over the place for this late week event - still a work in progress with timing issues but cold enough air close by

gem_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_22.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This so far is looking like a busted thread, but the potential in my mind continues. As we draw closer, this may start getting mapped a little clearer.  I've not thrown in the towel.  WPC continues the slightest potential for I84  3+". Admittedly not looking good but still a few days from merging the streams and cranking. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The past 2 runs of the ICON have trended slightly more favorably for this period if looking for a bigger storm. It's still not close, but a positive trend helps to keep hope alive. We need that n/s wave to lose as much latitude as possible to our west. I guess the vorticity lobe is actually an offshoot of the PV since it dives directly from the arctic. Historically it's tricky to get these features into the right position for phasing and east coast cyclogenesis.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, NEG NAO said:

0Z EURO - perfect storm track with no cold air in place prior - need the storm to slow down west of us and cold air get here first

prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp.conus.png

Look about 300 miles north and you have your issue. You want a big H there not L. Cold air comes in behind the storm as shown-from that we’d be dealing with the warm air coming in ahead of that Quebec low. There’s time for changes but not encouraging so far. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wdrag said:

Good analysis.  Clearly the GGEM and GfS have finally shown a se trend.  Nothing set in stone but this potential is on the table.  Maybe only  elevations but i can’t rule out anything including wet snow NYC if this closes off near NYC in the fast developing passage 

Euro is not good

prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp.us_ne.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Look about 300 miles north and you have your issue. You want a big H there not L. Cold air comes in behind the storm as shown-from that we’d be dealing with the warm air coming in ahead of that Quebec low. There’s time for changes but not encouraging so far. 

yes I saw that - that low needs to be further east just like the other night dragging down cold air in back of it to set the stage for the follow up storm.....

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

yes I saw that - that low needs to be further east just like the other night dragging down cold air in back of it to set the stage for the follow up storm.....

IMO it would be better if the northern stream wave and associated surface low diving through southern Canada were further southwest (and diving southward into the US), allowing a phase with the system moving towards the eastern US coast. If there is a surface low northeast of us, it will be very difficult to form a meaningful SLP along the east coast.

Unfortunately I think the big storm idea is becoming very unlikely.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, eduggs said:

IMO it would be better if the northern stream wave and associated surface low diving through southern Canada were further southwest (and diving southward into the US), allowing a phase with the system moving towards the eastern US coast. If there is a surface low northeast of us, it will be very difficult to form a meaningful SLP along the east coast.

Unfortunately I think the big storm idea is becoming very unlikely.

the last storm was not a big storm it was a weak fast moving mid lat. storm that had a couple of heavier bands. There was enough cold air because that Thursday night LP to the north passed and dragged in just enough cold this coming system late week setup is similar but the players are not in the same spot as before as of now......all about timing

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NEG NAO said:

the last storm was not a big storm it was a weak fast moving mid lat. storm that had a couple of heavier bands. There was enough cold air because that Thursday night LP to the north passed and dragged in just enough cold this coming system late week setup is similar but the players are not in the same spot as before as of now......all about timing

If the Canadian ULL is further southeast, yes you would get more in situ cold air locally and probably a weaker storm or no storm. Alternatively, model runs from a day or two ago that showed a stronger SLP, particularly incorporating wintry precipitation, showed partial phasing of the ULL with the other wave. In this modeled scenario, the ULL was much further southwest, all the way down into the Midwest in some cases. The SLP being downstream of the longwave trof in an area of PVA would allow for rapid surface deepening. In this scenario, cold air would bleed in slowly from the northwest as opposed to being in place beforehand. But this would also result in a much bigger storm. I personally prefer this latter scenario for a shot at a stronger storm. But right now there is virtually no model support for this scenario.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

time to put an "un" before the "likely" in the title of this thread ............and put "including NYC metro".....

prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp.conus.png

sn10_acc-imp.conus.png

Yep this threat is done. It was basically one model showing  a few inches .

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...