Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,764
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    samarham26
    Newest Member
    samarham26
    Joined

2024-2025 La Nina


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, GaWx said:

 Today’s Euro Weeklies suggest that (wind reversal or not in mid March) that the winter is nearly over. What I mean by that is no week-long period of BN temps for most of the E US. Other than New England being NN 3/3-9, the rest of the weeks are dominated by AN temp signals outside of FL the first 3 weeks.

Awesome.

I'm ready.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Natural Gas opening -5.3%, definitely gives credence to the warm March idea. 

However, Natural Gas did rise +60% this Winter.  When I released my Winter forecast, it was $2.60. Now it's $4.00. That's a +$1.40 increase on $2.60. So the Winter was colder than expectations, as energy prices reflect this. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Natural Gas opening -5.3%, definitely gives credence to the warm March idea. 

However, Natural Gas did rise +60% this Winter.  When I released my Winter forecast, it was $2.60. Now it's $4.00. That's a +$1.40 increase on $2.60. So the Winter was colder than expectations, as energy prices reflect this. 

Today’s Euro Weeklies: mild to warm all weeks

NG down to 3.96

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 We’re on the way to a top 3 CPC +PNA Feb since 1950 with top 2 possible. The only one that appears safe is the +2.04 of 1977. 1980’s +1.74 is 2nd. Both of those were El Niños. I’m projecting something within +1.55 to +1.9 for 2/2025. In 3rd is 2016’s +1.48, another El Niño.

 The highest Feb on record during La Niña is 2000’s +1.12.

 2024-5 is on track to be at least very close to the highest on record for DJF. Right now I have it being +1.42 to +1.53 with +1.46 to +1.50 most favored. The current highest is 2015-16’s +1.43 followed by 1976-7’s +1.41 (both El Niño). The highest on record for La Niña is only +0.89 (2000-1). That will be obliterated!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2025 at 3:14 AM, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Natural Gas opening -5.3%, definitely gives credence to the warm March idea. 

However, Natural Gas did rise +60% this Winter.  When I released my Winter forecast, it was $2.60. Now it's $4.00. That's a +$1.40 increase on $2.60. So the Winter was colder than expectations, as energy prices reflect this. 

Chuck, I see NG is -3.5% for the day currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Today’s 0Z GFS has a 60N 10 mb wind reversal on 3/10. But is it calling for a major SSW or a final warming?

IMG_3183.thumb.png.86aa735e713c374f1c29740a16e34099.png
 

 Back to 1958, there has been only one FW then or earlier, Mar 5th (2016). That one had the strongest Mar reversal on record (~-32). But there have also been three FWs on Mar 11-12. So, it is possible that it would be a FW. But there have also been 6 major SSW Mar 13-25.

1. 1965: SSW 3/25; FW 4/19

2. 1969: SSW 3/13; FW 4/13

3. 1971: SSW 3/20; FW 4/24

4. 1988: SSW 3/14; FW 4/6

5. 2000: SSW 3/20; FW 4/9

6. 2010: SSW 3/24; FW 4/30

 Right now I’d say the betting odds would somewhat favor major SSW. If that occurs, that doesn’t necessarily mean late Mar/Apr would be cool. If that were to be a FW, that also wouldn’t necessarily mean a cool late Mar and April would be favored. The 3/5/2016 FW is a great example as Mar as a whole was mild. (I didn’t check to see if the 2nd half by itself was cool, but that’s doubtful.)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GaWx said:

 Today’s 0Z GFS has a 60N 10 mb wind reversal on 3/10. But is it calling for a major SSW or a final warming?

IMG_3183.thumb.png.86aa735e713c374f1c29740a16e34099.png
 

 Back to 1958, there has been only one FW then or earlier, Mar 5th (2016). That one had the strongest Mar reversal on record (~-32). But there have also been three FWs on Mar 11-12. So, it is possible that it would be a FW. But there have also been 6 major SSW Mar 13-25.

1. 1965: SSW 3/25; FW 4/19

2. 1969: SSW 3/13; FW 4/13

3. 1971: SSW 3/20; FW 4/24

4. 1988: SSW 3/14; FW 4/6

5. 2000: SSW 3/20; FW 4/9

6. 2010: SSW 3/24; FW 4/30

 Right now I’d say the betting odds would somewhat favor major SSW. If that occurs, that doesn’t necessarily mean late Mar/Apr would be cool. If that were to be a FW, that also wouldn’t necessarily mean a cool late Mar and April would be favored. The 3/5/2016 FW is a great example as Mar as a whole was mild. (I didn’t check to see if the 2nd half by itself was cool, but that’s doubtful.)

Here’s my response to Bluewave’s post about this (SSWE/FW) in the NYC forum: 

  1 hour ago


“You bring up a very good point. Even if this SSWE was to occur, there are zero guarantees that it would even couple. None of the stratospheric displacements and wave reflection events this winter (since November) ever coupled with the troposphere, so why would this one? And even if it did, there is a lag from when this is projected to occur, that would bring us into the final week of March or the start of April before the impacts would be felt. Too little, too late. We will be into astronomical spring at that point and all that would do is piss off 90% of the members here when there’s a coastal storm and it’s in the 40’s and raining”

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, GaWx said:

6. 2010: SSW 3/24; FW 4/30

 Right now I’d say the betting odds would somewhat favor major SSW. If that occurs, that doesn’t necessarily mean late Mar/Apr would be cool. If that were to be a FW, that also wouldn’t necessarily mean a cool late Mar and April would be favored.

The 2010 one should definitely debunk the myth. That was a record warm spring, which was followed by a record warm summer. By the way, that was coming off a record snow season (though that one came to an abrupt end, it was done by the end of February, and as early as mid-February in places Baltimore and south).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2025 at 3:48 PM, GaWx said:

I should add that if there is a reversal in mid March, I’m not saying it couldn’t end up being a FW since several FWs have occurred that early per what you said and the FW table I just posted. ~1 in 12 FWs since 1958 have occurred by Mar 13th. Some of the ensemble members appear to be FWs as they don’t come back up to the 0 line. We’ll no more as get closer to the possible wind reversal and the ensemble members start converging. Right now they’re all over the place.

March 24 2010 is interesting, we had a very hot spring and summer that year, record breaking as a matter of fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

The 2010 one should definitely debunk the myth. That was a record warm spring, which was followed by a record warm summer. By the way, that was coming off a record snow season (though that one came to an abrupt end, it was done by the end of February, and as early as mid-February in places Baltimore and south).

Yes I just said this lol, it was my all time favorite spring and summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

The 2010 one should definitely debunk the myth. That was a record warm spring, which was followed by a record warm summer. By the way, that was coming off a record snow season (though that one came to an abrupt end, it was done by the end of February, and as early as mid-February in places Baltimore and south).

 

3 hours ago, LibertyBell said:

March 24 2010 is interesting, we had a very hot spring and summer that year, record breaking as a matter of fact.

 

Indeed, there are plenty of exceptions. Though it was a major SSW (a reversal that wasn’t a FW), this one (3/24/2010) was a very weak and short reversal and late enough so that it was only ~12 m/s BN at the low point:

IMG_3158.thumb.png.6ee8e97068fd260f86b634030a3e1264.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, GaWx said:

 Today’s 0Z GFS has a 60N 10 mb wind reversal on 3/10. But is it calling for a major SSW or a final warming?

IMG_3183.thumb.png.86aa735e713c374f1c29740a16e34099.png
 

 Back to 1958, there has been only one FW then or earlier, Mar 5th (2016). That one had the strongest Mar reversal on record (~-32). But there have also been three FWs on Mar 11-12. So, it is possible that it would be a FW. But there have also been 6 major SSW Mar 13-25.

1. 1965: SSW 3/25; FW 4/19

2. 1969: SSW 3/13; FW 4/13

3. 1971: SSW 3/20; FW 4/24

4. 1988: SSW 3/14; FW 4/6

5. 2000: SSW 3/20; FW 4/9

6. 2010: SSW 3/24; FW 4/30

 Right now I’d say the betting odds would somewhat favor major SSW. If that occurs, that doesn’t necessarily mean late Mar/Apr would be cool. If that were to be a FW, that also wouldn’t necessarily mean a cool late Mar and April would be favored. The 3/5/2016 FW is a great example as Mar as a whole was mild. (I didn’t check to see if the 2nd half by itself was cool, but that’s doubtful.)

 

1 minute ago, GaWx said:

 

Indeed, there are plenty of exceptions. Though it was a major SSW (a reversal that wasn’t a FW), this one (3/24/2010) was a very weak and short reversal and late enough so that it was only ~12 m/s BN at the low point:

IMG_3158.thumb.png.6ee8e97068fd260f86b634030a3e1264.png

Larry, where do you get these charts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This from Dr. Levi Cowan:

In the tweet below he said:

“My personal mission to bring hurricane science, data, and forecasts to the public would not be possible without the weather observations, doppler radar stations, computer models, hurricane hunter aircraft, and weather satellites provided by NOAA and the NWS. Your favorite weather apps, TV meteorologists, and private weather companies would also be unable to function without this data or the civil servants who live and breathe it to synthesize it into public safety information.

All of these benefits cost each taxpayer the equivalent of a few cups of coffee per year, and surveys show most would be willing to pay much more. The American weather enterprise saves many, many times more money than it costs to run, making it one of the biggest bangs for your buck in the government. 

The impact of quality weather forecasts and infrastructure on society is multiplied many-fold by preventing economic disruptions, keeping public transportation efficient, and providing lead time to prepare for and mitigate disasters. Most importantly, it saves priceless lives.

Careful, long-term plans to streamline or reorient the weather enterprise in an evolving world are not bad, but *this plan* is insane. A feverish rush to take a cleaver to this workforce is self-destructive and dangerous to Americans who rely on the services they provide.”

—————————

My comments: Massive cuts to the life-saving, very efficiently run NWS/NOAA would be very stupid and dangerous imho. Hopefully cooler heads will prevail!

 Edit: Of course as wx enthusiasts, most of us are probably going to be biased against cuts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During Winter 2024-2025, the Arctic Oscillation (AO) had a preliminary average of -0.374. The AO was negative on 53% of days and at or below -1.000 on 34% of days. The AO was positive on 47% of days and at or above +1.000 on 24% of days.

In terms of extreme values, the AO was at -3.000 or below on 12% of days and at or above +3.000 on 3% of days. The lowest AO value of -5.257 (preliminary) was reached on February 15th. The highest AO value of +3.439 was reached on January 24th.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2025 at 7:32 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Just a cursory glace at some very preliminary stuff...I'll go on record right now as saying I'll be shocked if there is another La Nina next year. I call BS on the guidance....I could fathom a neutral, but warm ENSO would not suprise me in the least.

HM did a huge, detailed write up the end of March, 2012 following the disaster 11-12 winter. He titled it “GLAAMourous”. I wish i still had it saved. He stated that the worst case scenario for an east coast winter is a cold-neutral ENSO/-QBO/-PDO immediately following a La Niña. He said that it very strongly supports a flat, equatorial Aleutian ridge and +EPO……

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

HM did a huge, detailed write up the end of March, 2012 following the disaster 11-12 winter. He titled it “GLAAMourous”. I wish i still had it saved. He stated that the worst case scenario for an east coast winter is a cold-neutral ENSO/-QBO/-PDO immediately following a La Niña. He said that it very strongly supports a flat, equatorial Aleutian ridge and +EPO……

cold neutral following la nina like 89-90 and 01-02 ??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

cold neutral following la nina like 89-90 and 01-02 ??

 

Cold-neutral ENSO in and of itself is not the problem. It’s when you have the other factors mixed in with it…..immediately following a La Niña event along with a -QBO and -PDO. He found a very strong tendency for a flat, equatorial Aleutian high and +EPO. He went into a very detailed explanation of why that is. Wish I still had that blog

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

Cold-neutral ENSO in and of itself is not the problem. It’s when you have the other factors mixed in with it…..immediately following a La Niña event along with a -QBO and -PDO. He found a very strong tendency for a flat, equatorial Aleutian high and +EPO. He went into a very detailed explanation of why that is. Wish I still had that blog

I think this winter proved indisputably that using alphabet indexes exclusively for winter forecasting is far from a lock. To assume those indexes can be accurately forecasted in advance is equally as risky imho. Then throw in the nuances like variability during the winter and trends over the winter contrary to the anticipated final number (switching from + to - and vica versa) to name just a few, and it's accuracy is a cr@p shoot. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updates on last week’s thoughts:

1. heavy rain did not materialize for Galveston and Houston last weekend. Instead, a lighter rainfall occurred.

2. The Southwest experienced much warmer than normal conditions from Monday through Friday. Phoenix reached 90° on February 25th, its fourth earliest such temperature on record.  Tucson tied its high for the year, so far, with a temperature of 86° on February 24 and February 25.

3. No significant (6” or above) snowstorms occurred in Washington, DC to Boston or in the major Great Lakes cities (Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, and Toronto).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...