Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2024 Short/Medium Range Severe Weather Discussion


 Share

Recommended Posts

Interesting—hadn’t thought about it as other than a funnel cloud.  This AM, I can see that it stirred up some dust and disturbed a brush pile left from last weekend’s pruning.  Or some wind did do, anyway.  There were some good, strong gusts for awhile.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mogget said:

Interesting—hadn’t thought about it as other than a funnel cloud.  This AM, I can see that it stirred up some dust and disturbed a brush pile left from last weekend’s pruning.  Or some wind did do, anyway.  There were some good, strong gusts for awhile.

There was another angle showing a pretty clear debris circulation with the one near Albany. Obviously the emphasis is on Evansville etc. today but I think there were likely at least two tornadoes with this storm.

Edit: Juda/Albany supposedly already confirmed EF1 but I have yet to see anything on MKX's event page, a PNS or their Facebook page. May be yet another instance of someone on X stalking the DAT.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Tuesday (2/27) could become interesting depending on how that lead wave interacts with the northern stream as it ejects. 12z Euro would probably be a notable severe weather event for Illinois.

IMO Wednesday will struggle with a lack of instability, but there are large D6/D7 15% risks out from the SPC.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
yeah, [mention=147]Chicago Storm[/mention] was right in saying that you should read more and post less.

Well…sorry to disappoint you. I think you’ll be ok. Also, this is a discussion forum and not a fiefdom. I’d welcome and learn more from your critique or correction than from a visceral response.


.
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DocATL said:


Well…sorry to disappoint you. I think you’ll be ok. Also, this is a discussion forum and not a fiefdom. I’d welcome and learn more from your critique or correction than from a visceral response.


.

You shouldn't be posting a 348 hour map from an operational model. There is nothing to discuss there because it could easily change. If you want to post an ensemble mean that's fine but even then it is a day 12 map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stebo said:

You shouldn't be posting a 348 hour map from an operational model. There is nothing to discuss there because it could easily change. If you want to post an ensemble mean that's fine but even then it is a day 12 map.

Also not sure why a 348 hour temperature anomaly map belongs in the severe weather thread, unless he's trying to troll?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...