TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 At least we’ll wash the salt off everything 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, ORH_wxman said: So GFS/GEFS are a whiff/near-whiff while the 06z EPS is ripping the low into LI. Glad to see we've cleared up everything. I know where my money is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 It’s gonna be snowy next week in SNE 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JKEisMan Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 14 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: I know where my money is. Under your pillow? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 minute ago, JKEisMan said: Under your pillow? In @Torch Tigers G-string......Grrrrrrr 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 17 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: I know where my money is. Do we even have any money left to wager? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 19 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: So GFS/GEFS are a whiff/near-whiff while the 06z EPS is ripping the low into LI. Glad to see we've cleared up everything. 2 camps on eps also but more amped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Miser Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 17 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: It’s gonna be snowy next week in SNE Hopefully more rain than snow since my snowblower is down for the count at the moment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 We are at the range where the GFS has a SE bias that will trend NW within 84 hours... We now this by nowSent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 53 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Pot-kettle...don't you have like 7 kids? 3 bio oldest was conceived 46 years ago yesterday during some snow storm... 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: He likes to forecast the opposite of what everyone thinks and/or wants. Pretty predicatable. I explained what that was last night…it’s called “The Pope Effect.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceman1 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 11 minutes ago, Cold Miser said: Hopefully more rain than snow since my snowblower is down for the count at the moment. finally, we might might get a good snowstorm and you want rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 5 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: I explained what that was last night…it’s called “The Pope Effect.” Hopefully this storm isn't the "The Poop Effect". 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 just a note... the GFS is farther south because it has more confluence from the northern stream, not because it's less amplified. it's actually way more amped with the southern stream than the ECMWF so, although it's farther south, it doesn't seem to be due to its typical bias. for the record, I still think it's wrong, but it has a bit more validity this time since the differences between it and the other models is actually pretty small, and the northern stream can absolutely destructively interfere instead of phasing 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Pot-kettle...don't you have like 7 kids? That isn't early release, that's a firehose. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbenedet Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 25 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said: just a note... the GFS is farther south because it has more confluence from the northern stream, not because it's less amplified. it's actually way more amped with the southern stream than the ECMWF so, although it's farther south, it doesn't seem to be due to its typical bias. for the record, I still think it's wrong, but it has a bit more validity this time since the differences between it and the other models is actually pretty small, and the northern stream can absolutely destructively interfere instead of phasing That look on the GFS doesn't fit anything really. Not the MJO, not the teles; alone vs other guidance. Sure it could be onto something, but odds are strongly against imo. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, jbenedet said: That look on the GFS doesn't fit anything really. Not the MJO, not the teles; alone vs other guidance. Sure it could be onto something, but odds are strongly against imo. Very reasonable take and fair assessment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, jbenedet said: That look on the GFS doesn't fit anything really. Not the MJO, not the teles; alone vs other guidance. Sure it could be onto something, but odds are strongly against imo. well yes, I'm just showing why it has what it has. I don't think it's correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said: Fwiw, the Euro and UK are a better fit for the +d(PNA). In fact ... there's only been a couple model cycles out of the last several day's worth that really fit the general index manifold This entire erstwhile handling has been rather depressingly conserved. Always on the low-end representation of the correlation. I wonder if the EPS is attempting, though. .. I see the 0z mean with a sub 988 at D5.5 pretty well nucleated to the the proper climate location; and it still has those spread members indicating bomb depths or close to it. Not sure if some of those individual members have more N/stream involvement but probably. The 00z Euro operational was the best current compromised solution between the index argument, vs the lack-representation in the guidance. A low in the process of deepening below 985 mb while sliding under L.I. in route to just SE of ACK, with the 850 mb isotherms S of PVD ... Boy, the index imply a major - if only. day 5-6 is usually when storms modelled as significant sort of disappear or get unclear. Then they get sampled (when does this one get sampled?). And then at day 4 (tomorrow morning) the direction gets clearer. This is established weenie wisdom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 minute ago, brooklynwx99 said: well yes, I'm just showing why it has what it has. I don't think it's correct The thing is, anything can be correct at this lead. I don’t think we’ve seen the correct look just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 4 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: The thing is, anything can be correct at this lead. I don’t think we’ve seen the correct look just yet. Maybe, possibly, kinda, sorta.....lets see? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Kind of an exhausting hobby. I keep telling myself IDGAF but I come back for the next run. Remember this event has always been considered the gateway event to the new pattern and not a particular high % snowstorm. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, weathafella said: Kind of an exhausting hobby. I keep telling myself IDGAF but I come back for the next run. Remember this event has always been considered the gateway event to the new pattern and not a particular high % snowstorm. I'm considering anything from this storm pure gravy. Would be nice to score on a marginal setup, but it's never looked like anything other than marginal even on the good runs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJln491 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 6 minutes ago, weathafella said: Remember this event has always been considered the gateway drug to more model watching. Agreed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 8 Author Share Posted February 8 26 minutes ago, jbenedet said: That look on the GFS doesn't fit anything really. Not the MJO, not the teles; alone vs other guidance. Sure it could be onto something, but odds are strongly against imo. Yeah I've been more than less crooning that aspect for a few days, actually. The operational runs across the board are to varying degrees, not representative of the index calculations that originate from their own ens systems. It's weird. You know ( ...risking poking the hornet's nest here - ), if this corrected suddenly way more amped in the last 72 hours because the western N/A ridge is suddenly more represented and that triggers an N/stream canonical dive through MN ( like the GF-f'um S actually had two nights ago for f-sake), I would not be surprised. But it may not... you know, one sore rub about this stuff is that anomalies relative to the larger ongoing anomaly, do sometimes take place. But your right as rain on that look there. That's like a straight up zonal progressive rake by the operational run that is almost diametric to the principle of a increasing meridian flow associated with said ens derived index handling. Interesting. It's not just the GFS doing this though. All the other operational models appears to be guilty of this to some degree more coherent or less. They're all shirky looking- GFS is just most egregious as of late. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Looks like the icon will be south. Northern stream misses the phase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: I'm considering anything from this storm pure gravy. Would be nice to score on a marginal setup, but it's never looked like anything other than marginal even on the good runs. I wanna lay down some pack as a hedge on suppression with a big block. Oh and of course to give ya'll a better cold source... of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, MJO812 said: Looks like the icon will be south. Northern stream misses the phase Amps up last minute near Chatham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, MJO812 said: Looks like the icon will be south. Northern stream misses the phase North of 00z by a tick....didn't matter...potent southern streamers find ways to amp up frequently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 8 Author Share Posted February 8 32 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: I'm considering anything from this storm pure gravy. Would be nice to score on a marginal setup, but it's never looked like anything other than marginal even on the good runs. Yeah, for me the greater experimentation value is/was the verification of a storm on the index inflection - 13th is the steepest part of the graphical projections from the big three. That much seems fine at this point. The snow vs rain and where ... how much? Jesus Christ. Tele's say batten down the hatches. The operational runs are windshield wiper events at times even dim sunners. heh it may turn out the only major impact is the pain the neck this caused? Who knows. There is some availability to a colder solution though. I outlined this earlier, but I'm not actually too put out by these warm GGEM type washes... they're likely both deep layer wrong, and then also considering the native model bias ...etc of some of these tools to be warm BLs. I'm more intrigued in whether we hit the key-hole lat/lon because there's marginal but enough cold to make due if we can hit that. It's not impossible just yet that we do or don't either way. All the while, this thing has back ground arguments for being way more impressive anyway - that part's a separate frustration. If it got more amped and N/streamy-like ... no question to me that someone gets pretty damn white - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now