Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Mid/Late February will be rocking. (This year we mean it!) February long range discussion.


JenkinsJinkies
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CAPE said:

This is a good look on the EPS with significant NS energy tracking eastward and phasing into the 50-50 low ahead of the southern shortwave. The tricky part will be the next piece of energy dropping southward as the wave continues to track east.

 

1708171200-iIRbnqSk6S4.png

overall good changes, better chance of phasing and brings the vortex more E

IMG_4760.png?ex=65da4317&is=65c7ce17&hm=d794eebe7f0e603dc1c63a0a0ab3f2bd4b9f4d65c3134911a33de5041de07db4&

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CAPE said:

This is a good look on the EPS with significant NS energy tracking eastward and phasing into the 50-50 low ahead of the southern shortwave. The tricky part will be the next piece of energy dropping southward as the wave continues to track east.

 

1708171200-iIRbnqSk6S4.png

I just want a legitimate threat to track next week and this Euro run got me excited for that so mission accomplished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GEFS: PNA is negative for "PSU storm".. I don't care what the NAO is doing, the Pacific has overwhelmed the Atlantic constantly since 18-19. I mean, with the way it's trending, we may end up in the 50s. I still think PD is our best shot at snow, because it has the most favorable upper latitude pattern. 

When subsurface ENSO changes happen, the N. Pacific pattern does adjust, sometimes even despite what is going on at the surface. It's a fairly successful forecasting method. 

The -NAO/-PNA/+EPO, +NAO/+PNA/-EPO correlation is holding. Models were showing a break, but it backed off of the short term -NAO, associated with +PNA, and went stronger on long range -NAO associated with -PNA. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately what’s allowing it to come further north (a more relaxed flow than expected) is also allowing for thermal issues. We need that NS wave to play nice. Come across ahead and set the boundary. Or phase in behind. Riding right over the top is not going to work. It’s got a shot. I never said it didn’t.  But it’s still more complicated than I like. I’m tracking it through. Just have nothing to add really. 

Is there a science reason the ns wave seems to always be on top of the ss wave or is it just bad luck ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Hell of a split of the NS energy associated with the displaced TPV squeezed in between the amped EPO ridge and the developing -NAO. Reminds me of Prince in his prime.

1708052400-j3W0vhMJGf4.png

That little wave scooting eastward underneath along the boundary might be mildly interesting B)

Doesn't quite come together but not far off.

1708290000-bx9VQFtVWTM.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the data on Stratobserve there seems to be some changes going on mid to late month. 

These changes may cause the long range ensembles to improve in the next few days to colder and snowier scenarios for our area. 

Will be interesing to monitor. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ji said:


Is there a science reason the ns wave seems to always be on top of the ss wave or is it just bad luck ?

We discussed this a while back as a possible thorn.  The NS is simply not digging as far south.  We don’t have to get into why.  But the result is it’s very difficult to get a NS wave to phase in a way helpful to us with the STJ.  Instead they run over the top of us and run interference.  It’s a reason I’ve been bearish on scenarios that require a NS phase.  

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

We discussed this a while back as a possible thorn.  The NS is simply not digging as far south.  We don’t have to get into why.  But the result is it’s very difficult to get a NS wave to phase in a way helpful to us with the STJ.  Instead they run over the top of us and run interference.  It’s a reason I’ve been bearish on scenarios that require a NS phase.  

 

I know you’re talking about a different scenario involving a STJ, but this past Jan seemed to have broken the pattern of the northern stream running further north and staying north. Instead it dug further south at the last possible minute and the models were forced to play catch up. Twice in the same week. 

After this winter, for fun, I’m going to look at what pattern caused it to snow here in every case from 2017 to date. I suspect some combination of -EPO/-NAO but I want to see the data for myself. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Terpeast said:

I know you’re talking about a different scenario involving a STJ, but this past Jan seemed to have broken the pattern of the northern stream running further north and staying north. Instead it dug further south at the last possible minute and the models were forced to play catch up. Twice in the same week. 

There was a redonculous retrograding block. It was short lived and then the block retrograded all the way into the mid latitudes as the tpv moved back in but for that week it was about as suppressed a jet as you can get. And it barely got the NS to dig enough to get under us. 
 

Im not saying it’s impossible to get the NS far enough south.  But recently it sure doesn’t seem to be happening as often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Weather Will said:

Article in the Washington Post yesterday that latest studies show the Gulf Stream may collapse due to fresh water glacial melt sooner than previously thought, like within a few years.  Could cool things off over 30 degrees...mini ice age.  Maybe that will kill the SER.

We arent even in the middle of the current interglacial yet. The planet will get way warmer before it happens. Although maybe we have sped it up.

Ice_ages2.gif

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...