Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Mid/Late February will be rocking. (This year we mean it!) February long range discussion.


JenkinsJinkies
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Terpeast said:

It’s just one run maybe two, and the EPO trend may be incorrectly modeled, but Commodity WG posted this (and I consider them to be credible):

https://x.com/commoditywx/status/1756015637673972047?s=46&t=etSZn0BwxaYu-SKkXncW9w

Right now I don’t have any confidence in what’s going to happen the rest of this month. None. I’m in wait and see mode now. 

This isn't a new development though. This has been modeled for many days now. I do think that ridge closing off and shifting north + the Pac trough encroaching on the west coast is the main reason recent guidance is somewhat less cold for the beginning of late month 'prime' window. It looks temporary though as the trough retrogrades a bit with a PNA ridge starting to develop towards the 23rd.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

0z Ens runs look active. Both the GEFS and EPS indicate potential for the 18th and the 20-21st, and then ofc the PSU baby around the 24th. No details. Temperatures look below avg from the 17th on(colder on the EPS), but nothing super cold. The pattern continues to look volatile. Some of you need to stop living/dying with LR op runs.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CAPE said:

0z Ens runs look active. Both the GEFS and EPS indicate potential for the 18th and the 20-21st, and then ofc the PSU baby around the 24th. No details. Temperatures look below avg from the 17th on(colder on the EPS), but nothing super cold. The pattern continues to look volatile. Some of you need to stop living/dying with LR op runs.

My post showed the 00z EPS Day 10-15 h5.  There was nothing nice about it.  No PNA ridge, no 50/50... cutoff about to slam into the West which will raise heights into the Plains...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Interpretation of LR ens means requires a bit of skill. Nuanced. Look for the hints/trends over several runs 10+ days out.

 

On 2/9/2024 at 3:01 AM, psuhoffman said:

This enough blocking Chuck?

IMG_1429.thumb.png.72a72847a480567f365b7c30116704fb.png

Where did the mega 50/50 magically run off to on your post above?  Blocking is weaker.  NAO weaker.  Several runs showed this.  Now it's gone. So that's why it's right to be concerned 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, yoda said:

 

Where did the 50/50 magically run off to?  Blocking is weaker.  NAO weaker.  Several runs showed this.  Now it's gone. So that's why it's right to be concerned 

It's not weak here, and this is 8 days out. Maybe focus on this period and not worry so much about the period beyond that. There will be more error associated with location/strength of h5 features further into the run. Also there will be some actual waxing and waning regardless- the atmosphere is a fluid in motion. Even in a blocky pattern these features can't remain stationary.

1708279200-hSZHMh3Naeg.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Terpeast said:

I’m still not counting out the potential around PD. It’s a bit suppressed for us, but less suppressed than it was a few days ago. These things trend north most of the time, even though there’s a limit how far north they can get with a block in place. 

Agreed. I actually think that’s our best opportunity with the pacific going back to Nina quickly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

I’m still not counting out the potential around PD. It’s a bit suppressed for us, but less suppressed than it was a few days ago. These things trend north most of the time, even though there’s a limit how far north they can get with a block in place. 

Its crazy to look past a window with potential that is still 8-10 days out, because the weeklies have been persistent about the 24th lol. This isn't really even a suppressed look. It is a bit too far SE verbatim, and it is still pretty far out there. 

1708246800-T0cileVib6U.png

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...