Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Mid/Late February will be rocking. (This year we mean it!) February long range discussion.


JenkinsJinkies
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wasn't there a storm recently like this?  Like in the past 10 years or so?  Maybe 15? Not the insane amounts... but it crushed RAH to around RIC... EZF got a few inches... but once you got near DCA it was green grass.  I'm not sure if it was because of blocking... but I distinctly remember traveling up i95 and having to stop overnight in NC because the roads were so bad

Not sure how far south Dec. 2018 got but that sounds close
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

The gfs is slowly getting to the blocking the other guidance has. So it’s shifting this weird solution south. In the end once the gfs adjusts to reality I don’t thing this evolution can work for us. The boundary is going to be much further south than the gfs thinks because it’s not resolving the block correctly. In the end the only way I see the PD threat working is if a NS wave can dig in behind the stj wave and phase/buckle the flow and bomb it up the coast.  There are a couple NS waves that could do it. Euro control was very close last night but missed the phase by a hair. 

CMC is setting up for later

gem-all-namer-z500_anom-8257600.thumb.png.0dd081fad457b876be5103f4a2b701e7.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

CMC is setting up for later

gem-all-namer-z500_anom-8257600.thumb.png.0dd081fad457b876be5103f4a2b701e7.png

Yea if you look at the better guidance than the gfs they all are way more aggressive with the blocking and thus have a further south boundary for the period. That is bad for the PD threat unless there is a phased bomb. But it sets up Feb 21-24 period nicely. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:


Not sure how far south Dec. 2018 got but that sounds close

I live in Wilson NC right along I-95, (hang out here because the analysis is top notch).  December 2018 just petered out in my area.  i got 3 - 4 sloppy inches that then mostly got washed away when it changed to rain.  Just a bit west it was better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Honest question for one wanting to learn: what do you like about it?  I see a modest Idaho ridge and some SJ vorticity floating along.  I know that is nice in general but what is especially exciting about it?

I think there could be some phasing between 2 jet streams. Temps are an issue right now though. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea if you look at the better guidance than the gfs they all are way more aggressive with the blocking and thus have a further south boundary for the period. That is bad for the PD threat unless there is a phased bomb. But it sets up Feb 21-24 period nicely. 

GEFS has been consistently suppressed for the PD3 wave. 12z looks a little closer but still pretty far south and OTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Honest question for one wanting to learn: what do you like about it?  I see a modest Idaho ridge and some SJ vorticity floating along.  I know that is nice in general but what is especially exciting about it?

open flow, confluence, and southern stream vorts. cold air isn't an issue with an actual storm

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, psuhoffman said:

The gfs is slowly getting to the blocking the other guidance has. So it’s shifting this weird solution south. In the end once the gfs adjusts to reality I don’t thing this evolution can work for us. The boundary is going to be much further south than the gfs thinks because it’s not resolving the block correctly. In the end the only way I see the PD threat working is if a NS wave can dig in behind the stj wave and phase/buckle the flow and bomb it up the coast.  There are a couple NS waves that could do it. Euro control was very close last night but missed the phase by a hair. 

Screw it I'm rooting for the phased bomb to get a shot at PD3...come on NS! :lol:

Actually at the end of the 12z Euro those potential NS waves are still around (this time we actually want one of those, haha)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Shad said:

thoughts on hour 240 of Euro?

Probably going to be wrong, so hopefully I will be corrected if so, but I don't think we like what h5 showed at 240

500hv.conus.png

 

Ridge is not where we want it out west, in fact, it seems to be on top of the system.  There's a strong s/w crashing into CA, which is lowering the heights and pushing our ridge into the Plains instead of the Rockies where we want it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, yoda said:

Probably going to be wrong, so hopefully I will be corrected if so, but I don't think we like what h5 showed at 240

500hv.conus.png

 

Ridge is not where we want it out west, in fact, it seems to be on top of the system.  There's a strong s/w crashing into CA, which is lowering the heights and pushing our ridge into the Plains instead of the Rockies where we want it.

Yea control confirms it’s squashed everything and retrogrades the block all the way into central southern Canada. But eps looks much better. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Shad said:

thoughts on hour 240 of Euro?

We finally got a west-based -NAO block.. but there is a piece of the PV in NW Canada retrograding to possibly encroach on Alaska. That could fill the country with mild air.. A few days before then we have a block over Alaska, so that's a pretty big difference in a short amount of time. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, yoda said:

Probably going to be wrong, so hopefully I will be corrected if so, but I don't think we like what h5 showed at 240

500hv.conus.png

 

Ridge is not where we want it out west, in fact, it seems to be on top of the system.  There's a strong s/w crashing into CA, which is lowering the heights and pushing our ridge into the Plains instead of the Rockies where we want it.

Agreed, ridge too far east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...