Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,610
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

Mid/Late February will be rocking. (This year we mean it!) February long range discussion.


JenkinsJinkies
 Share

Recommended Posts

The whole end of that run was lol But what's interesting is how guidance continues to want to eject an stj wave around the PD period...Interested to see if that continues this week.

I like patterns where everything is backed up and stuff moved slow. Easier to consolidate into one biggie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ji said:


I like patterns where everything is backed up and stuff moved slow. Easier to consolidate into one biggie

So you'd say in this fantasy run that it looked that way? (That wave looked like sitting under that block for 3 days, lol)

P.S. Not trying to overanalyze a fantasy run. I do like to use those to just a rough general idea of what scenarios could work and any consistent clues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ji said:

06z gfs suppressed too. I guess if there kd one storm you want showing suppression now...it's this one

Sent from my SM-A515U using Tapatalk
 

It isn't suppressed(assuming you are referring to VD as in your previous post). There are multiple pieces of energy in the NS and SS for the window centered on the 14th and guidance is a bit all over the place resolving the timing and interactions.

1707922800-jyNXoXLFM5k.png

1707955200-28EEg1RhGOs.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saturday afternoon I predicted that southern suppression would probably be a problem going forward through February because of NS strength. Other factors can also contribute to a generally dryer than normal precipitation pattern. This morning the EPS, CMC and GEFS all support that idea through PD.

Always remember, we can sometimes have significant snow with below normal precipitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wonder why Tomer is not as excited as some? 

Granted, he seems to say moderate snow events likely in the upcoming pattern after mid month, but he states he does not see a historic snowfall pattern based on the current modeling. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frd said:

 

Wonder why Tomer is not as excited as some? 

Granted, he seems to say moderate snow events likely in the upcoming pattern after mid month, but he states he does not see a historic snowfall pattern based on the current modeling. 

 

 

He is being objective, laying out the statistical probabilities based on similar patterns. There are never any guarantees, regardless of how historically favorable the pattern might look.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_1332.thumb.png.1d31f87432dbdaa14c238b657cc4281a.png

This looks beautiful but it’s also suppressive right there. We might need that beast of a block to retro and weaken some. That’s why Feb 22-25 has been and continues to be the best window. Nothing has changed at all. We can snow from one of the waves before. But early on Feb 12-16 temps could be an issue during the transition week. Then from Feb 17-22 suppression could be an issue.  Our best chance at a big storm is as the first wave (I think we get multiple pulses and chances with blocking now until late March) fades some and allows one of the pacific waves to amplify. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

IMG_1332.thumb.png.1d31f87432dbdaa14c238b657cc4281a.png

This looks beautiful but it’s also suppressive right there. We might need that beast of a block to retro and weaken some. That’s why Feb 22-25 has been and continues to be the best window. Nothing has changed at all. We can snow from one of the waves before. But early on Feb 12-16 temps could be an issue during the transition week. Then from Feb 17-22 suppression could be an issue.  Our best chance at a big storm is as the first wave (I think we get multiple pulses and chances with blocking now until late March) fades some and allows one of the pacific waves to amplify. 

The 18-20th window definitely runs the risk of a suppressed track. Plenty of time for corrections with the key features, but it very well may be the storm after that becomes the focus. Crazy how the extended guidance has been locked in on the period centered on the 23rd.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CAPE said:

He is being objective, laying out the statistical probabilities based on similar patterns. There are never any guarantees, regardless of how historically favorable the pattern might look.

One flaw in his probabilities is he uses all Greenland high regimes which if you believe (as I know you do) that Ninos are different and special skews the data. I guarantee you our probabilities of a big snow are higher than those numbers in a Nino blocking regime.  
 

However what he is doing is probably a smart play. People are all over the snow angle. But especially for NYC the odds of a lot of snow are maybe only 50%.  They could be north of the max. They need a shit ton just to get to average. They missed most of the snow we got last month. Odds are decent that get snow but not enough there to recover. And I know from experience NYC snow weenies are a picky crowd. If they get say 15” the rest of the way they will consider this year a total epic fail. 
 

So maybe he is angling himself for the win here by playing the other side. 

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

One flaw in his probabilities is he uses all Greenland high regimes which if you believe (as I know you do) that Ninos are different and special skews the data. I guarantee you our probabilities of a big snow are higher than those numbers in a Nino blocking regime.  
 

However what he is doing is probably a smart play. People are all over the snow angle. But especially for NYC the odds of a lot of snow are maybe only 50%.  They could be north of the max. They need a shit ton just to get to average. They missed most of the snow we got last month. Odds are decent that get snow but not enough there to recover. And I know from experience NYC snow weenies are a picky crowd. If they get say 15” the rest of the way they will consider this year a total epic fail. 
 

So maybe he is angling himself for the win here by playing the other side. 

he does this stuff all the time. he said NW of I-95 would be "favored" for the Feb 2021 blizzard. they were! they got 30" while NYC got 18" lmao like give me a break

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

IMG_1332.thumb.png.1d31f87432dbdaa14c238b657cc4281a.png

This looks beautiful but it’s also suppressive right there. We might need that beast of a block to retro and weaken some. That’s why Feb 22-25 has been and continues to be the best window. Nothing has changed at all. We can snow from one of the waves before. But early on Feb 12-16 temps could be an issue during the transition week. Then from Feb 17-22 suppression could be an issue.  Our best chance at a big storm is as the first wave (I think we get multiple pulses and chances with blocking now until late March) fades some and allows one of the pacific waves to amplify. 

this progression looks quite similar to 2016... you had a suppressive 50/50 and a deep trough off of the WC. a wave ejected from the trough as the block decayed, and the trough retrograded and allowed for a transient +PNA. the rest is history

IMG_4603.gif.9ced10aecbf6096fb2c3f31460b572ab.gif

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CAPE said:

He is being objective, laying out the statistical probabilities based on similar patterns. There are never any guarantees, regardless of how historically favorable the pattern might look.

It's good to be rational and objective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...