Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Mid/Late February will be rocking. (This year we mean it!) February long range discussion.


JenkinsJinkies
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don’t know if you guys realize this but we just had a close miss. This could have been us if the omega block was displaced 500 miles west. (It was that weird clipper that dived from the NW and it was DOA when it got here, but it went nuclear as soon as it went neg tilt before Nova) At least we have another shot later this month

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frd said:

I was not aware how dramatic the North America snow cover has declined. Pretty remarkable.    

Interesting post by @bluewave below. 

<

The record low snow cover may be part of the reason the surface temperatures days 11-15 will be significantly warmer than the 850mb temperatures. 
 

C6100126-DBE1-4244-BD41-E9CFC938CFF1.png.26f537b312eb62556d9d879e2aa54c83.png
6E660604-6694-43B7-9888-ED942A12D32F.thumb.png.a7bcca6a246c9c3e9f98006bd95c4faa.png

A438185B-6BCF-4F6F-B1F6-DE28A517C9A9.thumb.png.37b5f756e3bb1b89b4f2b1f447f1ab92.png

 

>

 

the snowcover should recover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DarkSharkWX said:

the snowcover should recover

We are not far away from the time of year when retaining snow cover becomes a real challenge outside of the mountain west and interior New England. Doesn’t mean it can’t snow of course, but you need that early season snowfall And sustained cold to have big impact on snow cover outside the mountains. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DarkSharkWX said:

the snowcover should recover

Well, it had recovered nicely but then it tanked again.  Perhaps it was considerably thinner than normal.  Zooming out from the eastern CONUS, the big story of the winter has been the absolute obliteration of the heartland's snow/cold by the December torch.  It was mild here but it was quite muted compared to what they had.  They did have a nice cold outbreak in January along with most of the country, but by then the damage had been done.  As the years go by it becomes more and more apparent that the events of the "pre-winter" (late November) and the first third of winter can have significant impacts on the evolution of the rest of the winter.

  • Weenie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

here’s a good example of why the GEFS having a temporary “Pacific onslaught” isn’t really bad at all. the same thing happened in 2016. there was a surge eastward of the aleutian trough, leading to even some ridging into the C US and Great Lakes. a wave slipped underneath, the trough retrogrades, leading to a transient +PNA and boom

 

IMG_4603.gif

IMG_4594.thumb.png.5b5df71f42785d24ebc6ee7d44071e04.png

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frd said:

I was not aware how dramatic the North America snow cover has declined. Pretty remarkable.    

Interesting post by @bluewave below. 

<

The record low snow cover may be part of the reason the surface temperatures days 11-15 will be significantly warmer than the 850mb temperatures. 
 

C6100126-DBE1-4244-BD41-E9CFC938CFF1.png.26f537b312eb62556d9d879e2aa54c83.png
6E660604-6694-43B7-9888-ED942A12D32F.thumb.png.a7bcca6a246c9c3e9f98006bd95c4faa.png

A438185B-6BCF-4F6F-B1F6-DE28A517C9A9.thumb.png.37b5f756e3bb1b89b4f2b1f447f1ab92.png

 

>

 

Surface temps only matter during precipitation events.

I only look at 850mb temp anomalies at range, since those tell us where the anomalously warm and cold airmasses are or are going. 

Saying that surface temps are warmer than 850 temps as far as anomalies go is a bit misleading, though.

This would hold true if it’s a bright sunny cloudless day, especially with no snowcover, when you could have cold 850mb temps but with dry adiabatic mixing you’ll probably reach average or even slightly above at the surface. 

But if it’s dry and sunny, who cares. Take the same 850mb temps during a precipitation event, you’re almost certainly getting snow. That’s when we’d check the sfc temps, or better, the soundings. 

The poster who said that may be a good researcher, but he conveniently left all of the above out.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cbmclean said:

Interesting to note that the Greenland Ridge is the only game in town if you want a HECS.

Not if you think about what it takes to get a hecs. To get 20” we need a lot of WAA. We’re too far SW to get that much from a coastal CCB like NYC and Bos can sometimes. Coastal simply aren’t developed and intense enough by our latitude to get those kinds of totally purely from the CCB like further north. I’m not saying it’s impossible but it’s highly unlikely. To get hecs totals here we need WAA precip in advance of the coastal. Ideally we even want the wave to try to cut to our west and throw a crap ton of gulf moisture at us. But the problem is we need it not to cut. We need it to start west so that we get gulf moisture fetch thrown at us but we need the wave to hit a brick wall and be forced to transfer under us. The only mechanism to do that is a coupled nao block with 50/50 low. 
 

Sometimes the wave might only have an inverted trough attached to an anchor NS upper feature like 1996.  But we need a sw flow of gulf moisture ahead of the eventual coastal and the only way out thermals can survive that is with a stout block. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


discrete, trackable event by the end of the weekend? by god, [mention=51]WxUSAF[/mention] pulled off his call.

It’s got to be strong but south for it to work in the marginal cold. No breathing room but 2nd run in a row there shortwave tracked just below us
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It’s got to be strong but south for it to work in the marginal cold. No breathing room but 2nd run in a row there shortwave tracked just below us

It’s the year of the last minute southern trend. All we need to do is create 3 threads before the storm ;)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It’s the year of the last minute southern trend. All we need to do is create 3 threads before the storm default_wink.png

I’m going to try to be positive the next 6 weeks despite the rough start to the pattern change
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ji said:


I’m going to try to be positive the next 6 weeks despite the rough start to the pattern change emoji13.png

I will support you in this endeavor :lol:(there's gonna have to be some kind of penalty if you fall of the wagon though.t.like something you genuinely hate doing, lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...