Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

February 2024


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LibertyBell said:

IMO it's not the decline in 1-3 thats a big deal, it's the decline in 3-6 thats the real issue here.  a bunch of 3-6 storms add up quickly and thats what we've really lacked

 

This time period compared to 70 through 99 will be telling, as we cannot compare this to 00 through 18 (55 through 60 is a direct pattern comparison to 00 through 18).

I am tracking average annual snowfall starting this decade against that period. I suspect they will be very close (+-2.5 inches CPK). Reasons I have already stated (increased moisture/dynamics offsetting temps). 

My tipping point will be when we stop seeing Tennessee, Delmarva getting hammered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Every other model is north of the GFS. It might be in its overly suppressed mode 5 days out which sometimes results in it being shown well OTS but this time it means major hit for us. Very high likelihood it corrects back north later today or tomorrow. I don’t see really anything to keep it from favoring New England, and probably NNE at that. 

Blocking ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Every other model is north of the GFS. It might be in its overly suppressed mode 5 days out which sometimes results in it being shown well OTS but this time it means major hit for us. Very high likelihood it corrects back north later today or tomorrow. I don’t see really anything to keep it from favoring New England, and probably NNE at that. 

granted, it's farther south because it has more confluence from the northern stream, not because it's less amplified. it's actually way more amped with the southern stream than the ECMWF

so, although it's farther south, it doesn't seem to be due to its typical bias. for the record, I still think it's wrong, but it has a bit more validity this time since the differences between it and the other models are actually pretty small, and the northern stream can absolutely destructively interfere instead of phasing

ezgif-2-aa22a39506.thumb.gif.7f545a70d9d5daf08b52844fdbf9d58c.gif

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TJW014 said:

16th/17th and beyond have more of my interest. Cold air will finally be funneling in with the 16th/17th possible event which could give us some minor accumulations, but really sets us up for something to tap into should something develop in the longer run. With our luck it'll just be wasted cold air

that makes sense since minor accumulations is the norm in NYC the last 2 years so maybe they can make it to 4 or 5 inches total for the season so far....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Here are the graphed outcomes:

image.png.c319306c4e90351a633368efe134655f.pngimage.png.ab07757af7c84a6c95f0c412d4752c28.png

 

 

It seems like the increase in 6”+ days has masked the decline in 1-3”. So when we get the inevitable drop in larger events, there isn’t a small events cushion to fall back on. This has resulted in 5 out of the last 6 seasons in NYC with below average snowfall so far.

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
Mean 0.0 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.5 2.2 T 14.4
2023-2024 0.0 T T 2.3 0.0 M M 2.3
2022-2023 0.0 0.0 T T 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.3
2021-2022 0.0 T 0.2 15.3 2.0 0.4 0.0 17.9
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, bluewave said:

It seems like the increase in 6”+ days has masked the decline in 1-3”. So when we get the inevitable drop in larger events, there isn’t a small events cushion to fall back on. This has resulted in 5 out of the last 6 seasons in NYC with below average snowfall so far.

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
Mean 0.0 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.5 2.2 T 14.4
2023-2024 0.0 T T 2.3 0.0 M M 2.3
2022-2023 0.0 0.0 T T 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.3
2021-2022 0.0 T 0.2 15.3 2.0 0.4 0.0 17.9
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5

 

I agree. I suspect that this development is an indication that the New York City area could be in the early stages of a transition toward a lower snowfall state due to the ongoing warming with the 30-season average falling to around 20" by the mid-2030s. A bad cycle may be amplifying the drop in snowfall.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EastonSN+ said:

This time period compared to 70 through 99 will be telling, as we cannot compare this to 00 through 18 (55 through 60 is a direct pattern comparison to 00 through 18).

I am tracking average annual snowfall starting this decade against that period. I suspect they will be very close (+-2.5 inches CPK). Reasons I have already stated (increased moisture/dynamics offsetting temps). 

My tipping point will be when we stop seeing Tennessee, Delmarva getting hammered.

DelMarVa maybe but Tennessee maybe not because areas near the ocean are warming faster because the ocean itself is warming faster.

I'm not sure what's up with the DelMarVa because DC's snowfall has dropped pretty quickly.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bluewave said:

It seems like the increase in 6”+ days has masked the decline in 1-3”. So when we get the inevitable drop in larger events, there isn’t a small events cushion to fall back on. This has resulted in 5 out of the last 6 seasons in NYC with below average snowfall so far.

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
Mean 0.0 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.5 2.2 T 14.4
2023-2024 0.0 T T 2.3 0.0 M M 2.3
2022-2023 0.0 0.0 T T 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.3
2021-2022 0.0 T 0.2 15.3 2.0 0.4 0.0 17.9
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5

 

It seems like we still get 1-3 pretty commonly.  We don't get the moderate 3-6 storms much anymore.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Here are the graphed outcomes:

image.png.c319306c4e90351a633368efe134655f.pngimage.png.ab07757af7c84a6c95f0c412d4752c28.png

 

 

@donsutherland1 Is it possible that some of the 1-3" days in the early years would be 3-6" days under current snow measuring techniques? And similarly some of the 3-6" days (not shown) would have registered as 6"+ days under current snow measuring techniques? This trend might mostly be generally an artifact of data quality issues and actually masking a general decrease in total snowfall.

UCAR estimates proper snow board use with 6-hourly measurements can increase reported total snowfall by 15-20 percent relative to a single storm measurement. Moreover, there were other inconsistencies before 1950, including the use of a simple 10:1 ratio for snowfall at some sites and/or simply measuring change in depth (although I don't think this was the case at Central Park). Regardless, snow boards didn't come into use until the latter half of the 20th century.

Source: Snowfall measurement: a flaky history | NCAR & UCAR News

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

DelMarVa maybe but Tennessee maybe not because areas near the ocean are warming faster because the ocean itself is warming faster.

I'm not sure what's up with the DelMarVa because DC's snowfall has dropped pretty quickly.

 

DC always had issues as they are too far north for SE sliders and too far south for many Miller Bs. 

How much warmer can ocean temps realistically get to (obviously boiling but that would be a much much graver situation lol).

Remember coastal NC just had a good snowfall event too. That is important considering water temps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, bluewave said:

It seems like the increase in 6”+ days has masked the decline in 1-3”. So when we get the inevitable drop in larger events, there isn’t a small events cushion to fall back on. This has resulted in 5 out of the last 6 seasons in NYC with below average snowfall so far.

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
Mean 0.0 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.5 2.2 T 14.4
2023-2024 0.0 T T 2.3 0.0 M M 2.3
2022-2023 0.0 0.0 T T 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.3
2021-2022 0.0 T 0.2 15.3 2.0 0.4 0.0 17.9
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5

 

We have to carve out 70 through 99 and and compare against 2020 onwards. 2000 through 2018 was more in line with 55 through 69 especially in terms of KUs.

I am tracking the average annual CPK snowfall 70 through 99 against 2020 onwards. My thoughts are still +-2.5 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Franklin0529 said:

Still no cold air. Unless it bombs out it will be rain or white rain

If the confluence is real and we can develop the low quickly as it goes to our south it should snow. Question would be how much is wasted on the front end due to the marginal airmass or otherwise if we struggle to get to 32. But I wouldn’t jump on any snowy solution unless other models jump on board and we hold that solution for at least 24 hours. We’ve seen time and again these lows especially southern stream trend north at the end and confluence weaken. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EastonSN+ said:

This time period compared to 70 through 99 will be telling, as we cannot compare this to 00 through 18 (55 through 60 is a direct pattern comparison to 00 through 18).

I am tracking average annual snowfall starting this decade against that period. I suspect they will be very close (+-2.5 inches CPK). Reasons I have already stated (increased moisture/dynamics offsetting temps). 

My tipping point will be when we stop seeing Tennessee, Delmarva getting hammered.

 

again, these are just theories at this point. You have posted this before that you do not see it direct correlation with the warmth and the lack of snow.

I have a theory that we will actually be much more affected by warming than places like the Delmarva or the Tennessee valley. simply because of location and because we are an extreme urban environment that doesn’t exist anywhere else in the country. 

You are already seeing this play out in real time.

 

You were looking at a north south east west axis for your warming assumptions going forward. I’m looking at that plus extreme urbanization and urban heat island.

I think if you move north and west of New York City, your assumptions will be more in line of a traditional axis by which the warming is moving.

 

But I think New York City in terms of snowfall is fucked at this new warmer climate. I don’t think it’s an aberration. I don’t think it will be comparable to the 70s and 80s and 90s. I think we have seen a sharp drop off in snow due to the fact that we are now running 5 to 10° warmer on any given day then we should be. And in a cement jungle like Brooklyn (sorry MJO) you cant snow under those circumstances

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

It seems like we still get 1-3 pretty commonly.  We don't get the moderate 3-6 storms much anymore.

 

Not commonly enough anymore to reach 25” in a season without a big KU event.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

If the confluence is real and we can develop the low quickly as it goes to our south it should snow. Question would be how much is wasted on the front end due to the marginal airmass or otherwise if we struggle to get to 32. But I wouldn’t jump on any snowy solution unless other models jump on board and we hold that solution for at least 24 hours. We’ve seen time and again these lows especially southern stream trend north at the end and confluence weaken. 

GFS is total nonsense

gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_22.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...