Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Monitoring the 29th/30th for significant impact coastal redevelopment - confidence only medium for now but is trending favorably.


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah its really unstable aloft with the ULL/trough almost over us and at the sfc, we have a bit of an inverted trough producing some slight convergence helping form a few bands....and the colder advection at 925/850 is producing the OES on the south shore/Cape.

I know it looks innocuous on radar but right now it’s increased again to moderate . It only lasts a few minutes and then lightens . I’m not sure I’ve seen something here like this before. 
xBsgY7y.mp4

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, H2Otown_WX said:

I've got no issue with Tip starting the next "threat thread" but for the love of God, start it with a different word from "Monitoring." We have like a half inch combined from the last two that started with that word :axe:

well to be fair, he starts the threads like 6 weeks in advance (sarcasm) so about all we can do is "monitor"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SouthCoastMA said:

Today is very reminiscent of what went wrong last year. steady snow all day but only a dusting to show for. tapping into a very mediocre cold source

Temps will slowly fall. You should accumulate towards evening as long as it snows.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snowfall totals for CT, thanks to everyone for the reports. Below is our final call map which was even more conservative than our first call map, everything got pulled up and in. Overall it lines up pretty well. The 3-6" range was mostly close to the bottom end of that range for far N CT. I'll give it an A- 

I'll post the Southern New England map later on today when i finish it. 

01_29.24_jdj_ct_snowfall_totals.thumb.jpg.354c822b8e7153aceae4aa36e0c5cdde.jpg

01_27.24_jdj_ct_snowfall_forecast_update_2.thumb.jpg.546efd3ea81fbfc15f3ddc64d087bde9.jpg

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, H2Otown_WX said:

I've got no issue with Tip starting the next "threat thread" but for the love of God, start it with a different word from "Monitoring." We have like a half inch combined from the last two that started with that word :axe:

I wanted to get back and change both recent titles actually, but during the course of both run-up week(s) I was bombed at work; and so it not really being a huge priority in anyone's life ( certainly should not be),  I didn't find the time do so - oh well.

That said, I don't typically use the word "threat," anyway.  Not a big fan of that expression. I feel/suspect it is used ( if unconsciously ) to lean everything in a euphoria pitch. I like talking about prospects more dispassionately than that. 

I refer to 'periods of interest,' and then if those coalesce more coherently, 'signals' is warranted.    I find that tact to be necessarily neutral enough.  I am aware that I do reasonably well at diagnosing these events in the D6-10 range - not my first rodeo and have been told this over the years.  NO, one cannot guarantee therein who gets the 8" and who "suffers" with 3" ...  But the confidences of those, this season so far, have worked out well being set at medium for good reasons  -I'm satisfied with the verification on both.   But therein lies some responsibility not to inflate using dialogue that contributes to that euphoria thing people have created out of weather modeling graphics-engagement.  Which I frankly am not even sure that is healthy -

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I wanted to get back and change both recent titles actually, but during the course of both run-up week(s) I was bombed at work; and so it not really being a huge priority in anyone's life ( certainly should not be),  I didn't find the time do so - oh well.

That said, I don't typically use the word "threat," anyway.  Not a big fan of that expression. I feel/suspect it is used ( if unconsciously ) to lean everything in a euphoria pitch. I like talking about prospects more dispassionately than that. 

I refer to 'periods of interest,' and then if those coalesce more coherently, 'signals' is warranted.    I find that tact to be necessarily neutral enough.  I am aware that I do reasonably well at diagnosing these events in the D6-10 range - not my first rodeo and have been told this over the years.  NO, one cannot guarantee therein who gets the 8" and who "suffers" with 3" ...  But the confidences of those, this season so far, have worked out well being set at medium for good reasons  -I'm satisfied with the verification on both.   But therein lies some responsibility not to inflate using dialogue that contributes to that euphoria thing people have created out of weather modeling graphics-engagement.  Which I frankly am not even sure that is healthy -

Don't change a thing! I know some members here did not get snow, some got bonus surprises , I will take my 4.25" of snow and run with it,  I thought I was going to be at 30" after this event, but looked at my chart I keep and I am at 26.5" going into Feb. who knows I could be off an inch here or there, etc. For snow enthusiasts its always great when you and others sniff out potential, yes, no guarantee , but the chase sometimes is just as fun (sometimes haha) hopefully on to the next signal!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I wanted to get back and change both recent titles actually, but during the course of both run-up week(s) I was bombed at work; and so it not really being a huge priority in anyone's life ( certainly should not be),  I didn't find the time do so - oh well.

That said, I don't typically use the word "threat," anyway.  Not a big fan of that expression. I feel/suspect it is used ( if unconsciously ) to lean everything in a euphoria pitch. I like talking about prospects more dispassionately than that. 

I refer to 'periods of interest,' and then if those coalesce more coherently, 'signals' is warranted.    I find that tact to be necessarily neutral enough.  I am aware that I do reasonably well at diagnosing these events in the D6-10 range - not my first rodeo and have been told this over the years.  NO, one cannot guarantee therein who gets the 8" and who "suffers" with 3" ...  But the confidences of those, this season so far, have worked out well being set at medium for good reasons  -I'm satisfied with the verification on both.   But therein lies some responsibility not to inflate using dialogue that contributes to that euphoria thing people have created out of weather modeling graphics-engagement.  Which I frankly am not even sure that is healthy -

No worries man, I greatly appreciate your insight. We're very lucky to have someone as knowledgeable as you on the board. I was kind of tongue in cheek about the word monitoring being bad luck lol. Thanks for the response.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 512high said:

Don't change a thing! I know some members here did not get snow, some got bonus surprises , I will take my 4.25" of snow and run with it,  I thought I was going to be at 30" after this event, but looked at my chart I keep and I am at 26.5" going into Feb. who knows I could be off an inch here or there, etc. For snow enthusiasts its always great when you and others sniff out potential, yes, no guarantee , but the chase sometimes is just as fun (sometimes haha) hopefully on to the next signal!

Hopefully we can double our seasons totals in one big storm, PDIII has a nice ring.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I like living up here and this is why I like snow pack. Frankly, it’s better when the pack is only 10 to 15 inches like it is today because it’s easier to create a trail for walking.
off the back of our property I can walk about a quarter of a mile up to a hill at over 800 feet and I get this amazing view. Of course I have my constant companion with me. The zoomed in photograph to the distant area is north north east. Somewhere over there is Dendriteland and the chickens

IMG_0823.jpeg

IMG_0822.jpeg

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Snowfall totals for CT, thanks to everyone for the reports. Below is our final call map which was even more conservative than our first call map, everything got pulled up and in. Overall it lines up pretty well. The 3-6" range was mostly close to the bottom end of that range for far N CT. I'll give it an A- 

I'll post the Southern New England map later on today when i finish it. 

01_29.24_jdj_ct_snowfall_totals.thumb.jpg.354c822b8e7153aceae4aa36e0c5cdde.jpg

01_27.24_jdj_ct_snowfall_forecast_update_2.thumb.jpg.546efd3ea81fbfc15f3ddc64d087bde9.jpg

Wow great job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

Did you skin it this morning? 

Yup. I made the observation this morning on the board that I had expected more snow at Wachusett but felt like there was only 6-7" at the summit. I've only skinned 4x this year so far...Twice in December and it was depressing. The predominant sound was running water on the hill but I went last Wednesday and this morning and both times there has been snow falling and it has been quite nice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...