Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chimoss
    Newest Member
    Chimoss
    Joined

Monitoring the 29th/30th for significant impact coastal redevelopment - confidence only medium for now but is trending favorably.


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Layman said:

I enjoy your posts and appreciate your meteorological evolution but don't understand the Papal praise.  Might I suggest you take the age-old "trust but verify" approach and whenever you see a Vatican-based observation posted simply click on this link to see how accurate it is:  https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/webcams/dover_united-states_5085520 

I have the benefit of looking out my window to see if what's stated is true.  For example, the other morning an obs was posted saying "Coating, flurries now".  We actually had 1/2" to 3/4" of snow on the ground and light snow falling that lasted for hours, eventually giving us about an inch and half total.  Not crazy, but also not accurate.  For whatever reason, underplaying reality is a fetish for some posters here.  More power to them if that's what makes them happy.  If you're like me and prefer to live in the real world and value accurate info, take a moment to see if what people are saying is true or not.  

BTW, I hope you get crushed with a SEMA/Cape Cod blizzard before this winter is through.

I miss last year's George, everything was gonna be a blizzard- much more fun than downcast George.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Could slow down still and become yours  again….

It is possible yeah, but I wanted to see positive trends today and we got steps back instead. Im more interested in the clipper threat behind this one for my area. That needs some work but has been trending favorably the past couple of runs on the gfs. This storm speeding up appears to have helped the wave spacing for the follow up threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, George001 said:

It is possible yeah, but I wanted to see positive trends today and we got steps back instead. Im more interested in the clipper threat behind this one for my area. That needs some work but has been trending favorably the past couple of runs on the gfs. This storm speeding up appears to have helped the wave spacing for the follow up threat.

Maybe? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cold Miser said:

How can there be gravy without a main course to put it on?  ...I'm still waiting on the main course, or at least a dried out chicken wing appetizer that's been sitting under the heat lamp for a few days.

It's gravy in the sense that any snow in that pattern is a bonus....has nothing to do with whiffing during the good stretch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Brett flip flops better than anyone.

 

21 hours ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Hard for me lose with this one, unless it ends up a fish storm. 

 

1 hour ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Lots of white rain incoming 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Woodshed Scooter….we beast. 
 

His area is paying for being like 200% of climo between 2003-2019. :lol:

For someone that has almost 500,000 weather posts.. when you see him disappear.. you know it’s for one of two reasons.. either he doesn’t want to publicly melt or this storm and winter have totally and completely broken him and he needs time away and doesn’t want to ruin it for the folks getting good snows from it 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I'm not sure some of you made the right read off the Euro - just saw it.

It's really not farther S than the 00z run. It's faster along the same latitude - or too close by comparison to make any difference .. not worth the bi-polar reaction ( nervy neurotics for the low haha).

This run is in fact slightly deeper than the 00z run - but .. me really enough to matter there either.

The only difference here that sticks out to me is the areal expanse of QPF.  It's just drier - though it is not abundantly clear to me why that is the case.  So be it... That's suspicious.  

I don't think this run "caved" to jack shit really considering these aspects are so unchanged.  The QPF not being as distributed is debatable as even real. 

This run over all has really bad continuity so ... it's not abundantly clear this run should be used just because its bad and appeals some weird abandonment issues. 

I agree. Doesn't look like it should have been that paltry....I call BS. I mean, 12"+? No....but that had the appeal of a moderate event to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...