Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,144
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

It was a Flop... February 2024 Disco. Thread


Prismshine Productions
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 1/29/2024 at 1:59 PM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Me too. At the very least you guys have had a plethora of 18+ memorable events, which I guess you’re paying the price for,  in somewhat recent years. We haven’t had one since 2013…so I’m not sure what or who we’re paying. 

Expand  

It’s been worse for you even there…I’ve gotten in on alot of 12-18 inchers over the last 10 years too.  Now we scrimping for a couple inches…we’ll really appreciate the next decent one when it comes. 1/7 was somewhat decent however(a low end warning event), close to 8” in that here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to hear Wills thoughts on Feb

 

At what % do Medium range weeklies , Twitter Mets and ensembles have to fail *in the day 14 -21 time frame * that Amy mention of these to make a prognostication should be couched in a caveat that they are not of significant value at those lead times OR is there a case to be made that day 14++ ensembles have been worse than usual (I was under impression that range was never of much value regarding accuracy )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:21 PM, HIPPYVALLEY said:

I’d prefer Stein April but yeah, looks boring. 

Expand  

I mean at some point I suppose it was inevitable that the gravy train of QPF would be shut off

The Huge QPF is also what made extreme S CT snowfall anomalies the last 2 winters pretty much epic rats to me 

Much easier to rat with normal to below normal QPF

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:24 PM, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I mean at some point I suppose it was inevitable that the gravy train of QPF would be shut off

The Huge QPF is also what made extreme S CT snowfall anomalies the last 2 winters pretty much epic rats to me 

Much easier to rat with normal to below normal QPF

Expand  

Same here.  Just unreal porkage. Dumbfounding. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:05 PM, WinterWolf said:

It’s been worse for you even there…I’ve gotten in on alot of 12-18 inchers over the last 10 years too.  Now we scrimping for a couple inches…we’ll really appreciate the next decent one when it comes. 1/7 was somewhat decent however(a low end warning event), close to 8” in that here. 

Expand  

I’ve had several 12-16 events since 2013 too but we’ve missed the next level events to our south, west, north, and east by like 25miles each. This the longest stretch of not getting 16+ in my life and I grew up in CNJ lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:42 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

This is a blockier version of 1973. The past two seasons I have bet against an awful result due to the anticipation of high latitude blocking....but it just hasn't mattered. Its sucked, anway, despite nailing the blocking.

Expand  

Yup. Until we see sustained changes in the pac we will continue with these lean winters. One or two weeks with a okay pacific isn’t enough time to capitalize, 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:24 PM, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I mean at some point I suppose it was inevitable that the gravy train of QPF would be shut off

The Huge QPF is also what made extreme S CT snowfall anomalies the last 2 winters pretty much epic rats to me 

Much easier to rat with normal to below normal QPF

Expand  

Yea. A wet rat looks worse then a dry rat.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:48 PM, Allsnow said:

Yup. Until we see sustained changes in the pac we will continue with these lean winters. One or two weeks with a okay pacific isn’t enough time to capitalize, 

Expand  

As much eye rolling as this will elicit right now, I still don't totally buy that.....some of this is just plain bad luck after decades of snowing at least excuse imaginable. Shit like not garnering enough separation between PV lobes has and will always happen in any type of regime.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:53 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

As much eye rolling as this will elicit right now, I still don't totally buy that.....some of this is just plain bad luck after decades of snowing at least excuse imaginable. Shit like not garnering enough separation between PV lobes has and will always happen in any type of regime.

Expand  

That’s fair, we haven’t had much break our way in years. It does seem like when we do get a favorable window the pacific orientation spoils the fun. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/29/2024 at 2:59 PM, Allsnow said:

That’s fair, we haven’t had much break our way in years. It does seem like when we do get a favorable window the pacific orientation spoils the fun. 

Expand  

Pacific certainly isn't helping....it's a bit of both... bad luck and a bad PAC.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...