Buddy1987 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Interstate said: I dont know... I am not a big fan at the h5... but that is just me I could be wrong here too but surface depiction is responding nicely with those changes at 63 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, Interstate said: I dont know... I am not a big fan at the h5... but that is just me It did clean itself up some at panel 72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Interstate said: I am not a big fan I am not a big fan of the NAM period. But it is definitely an improvement over 12Z. 6 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: I am not a big fan of the NAM period. But it is definitely an improvement over 12Z. The top shifted to the west some... which should help us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy1987 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, Interstate said: The top shifted to the west some... which should help us. Would love for that “finger” to point right at us. Anytime that normally happens in other winters we get hit pretty good. Right now has it going too far north and west into WV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy1987 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Take it how you may folks because it is the Nam but it was setting up to looking very nice end of the run with low pressure initiating inbetween CHS and MYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Buddy1987 said: Would love for that “finger” to point right at us. Anytime that normally happens in other winters we get hit pretty good. Right now has it going too far north and west into WV. It’s still a better run, higher heights. Let’s reel this one back now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 18z NAM 84hr vs the 12z GFS at 90hr https://ibb.co/80YSq6J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulythegun Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 GEOS-5 (12z) also basically out to sea, joining the ACCESS-G, SPIRE, UM(mmmmmmmmmmmm) models Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayyy Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 GEOS-5 (12z) also basically out to sea, joining the ACCESS-G, SPIRE, UM(mmmmmmmmmmmm) modelsNext up… the WRF-GONADS. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulythegun Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 The 557ww model also out to sea, though it looks abit closer to the coast than 12z UM, ACCESS-G, and GEOS-5. Reminds me more of the look on 12z ARPEGE 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayyy Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 I am not a big fan of the NAM period. But it is definitely an improvement over 12Z.Agreed. That being said…. For as much shit as that model gets… is a threat REALLY there without a proper NAMing? Just sayin’. We haven’t had a proper NAMing all season and I have 3” to show for it (shut it Ravensrule). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleocene Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, paulythegun said: The 557ww model also out to sea, though it looks abit closer to the coast than 12z UM, ACCESS-G, and GEOS-5. Reminds me more of the look on 12z ARPEGE where do you find these lmao 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Let’s just make up a model 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Comparing the NAM at 84 to this mornings 12z Global runs...it is most similar to the GGEM, not quite as amplified but significantly more amplified than the GFS. It was likely about to look good in the next couple frames IMO. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeDeeHCue Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Can’t wait to see what the 1620z THC model shows… 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikeymac5306 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, jayyy said: Next up… the WRF-GONADS . Better be big... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warm Nose Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Personally waiting for the HVNOFING-ID-EA to run. 3 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Mikeymac5306 said: Better be big... had a lot of blue! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Warm Nose said: Personally waiting for the HVNOFING-ID-EA to run. ^Dude up above posting any shit that can be found. It might already be there 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jebman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 hours ago, H2O said: Thats right, chumps. I'm starting the storm thread before the euro. This will bring it to us because starting threads always works. Weather listens to threads that get started. Instant JINX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jebman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 The JEB model always has snow for the Mid Atlantic. And it always verifies. 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVsnowlover Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 9 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said: Let’s just make up a model We could appropriately call it the LUCY model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 10 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: Comparing the NAM at 84 to this mornings 12z Global runs...it is most similar to the GGEM, not quite as amplified but significantly more amplified than the GFS. It was likely about to look good in the next couple frames IMO. Agreed. Just checked it out. NAM would have gotten us...but you know...NAM and all 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSSN+ Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 18z model looks solid 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 My money says the ICON is gonna be closer to its 6z run than 12z. Seems to be heading that way. See if I can go 0 for 2 today 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: Agreed. Just checked it out. NAM would have gotten us...but you know...NAM and all yea it is what it is... we all know who the JV players are, but its still better to have them on our side than against. Preponderance of evidence and all that jazz... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Time for the ICON to forget to load the only 3 panels we care about 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormy Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 12 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: Comparing the NAM at 84 to this mornings 12z Global runs...it is most similar to the GGEM, not quite as amplified but significantly more amplified than the GFS. It was likely about to look good in the next couple frames IMO. I'm happy to hear your analysis . The GGEM was on steroids at 12z! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts