Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,798
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Jan Medium/Long Range Disco 2: Total Obliteration is Coming


Jebman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, nj2va said:

There’s a snow futility, will it ever snow, a CC forum, and panic room - I think there’s plenty of places to complain/post about the elephant.  

Here's the issue though: It's becoming increasingly more difficult not to talk about it as it has become intertwined with our discussion of the medium/long range. Like if something that should work doesn't (and it used to), that convo is gonna leak in here. Hard to avoid, imo

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ji said:


Until the gfs is aboard the euro solutions will just be trash

Why do you think I'm pulling for it to get on board. I can't even get past the "interested" phase if the GFS isn't on board.  But as some pros have said, we may not see a shift either way on either model until this next cutter passes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think I'm pulling for it to get on board. I can't even get past the "interested" phase if the GFS isn't on board.  But as some pros have said, we may not see a shift either way on either model until this next cutter passes. 

Please for once let the European advanced physics actually benefit us. It’s deadly when its in dr no mode
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ji said:


Yes people were talking about global warming as much then as now.

But if you looked within the trends bad signs were showing then. We do run in cycles for snow. But from 2000 to 2016 we were in a congruence of a favorable Atlantic and pacific pattern.  Places north of us were getting way above normal snow. But we actually were below avg (by the historical numbers) during that stretch.

That period looks like Valhalla compared to recently. But it was bad if you compared it to previous periods where we got everything to line up. Look at the mean pattern from that period!

IMG_0877.png.719a406752636cf4262dbfa5de87451f.png
Warning sirens should have been going off when places to our north were running 150% of normal snow yet we were BELOW AVG even in that freaking amazing pattern for that period!  We should have had another period like the late 50s-60s then!  
 

So now we’re in a truly bad cycle with a mean long wave pattern that isn’t good. And in the past this would have been bad but just like the last good period wasn’t as good, this bad period is WORSE!  
 

We will get to another better cycle eventually. At some point the PDO and AMO will flip again. But the question is how much will our ability to snow have degraded by then?   How muted will that next cycle be. Is assuredly will be better than this. But does it even get back to that 2000-2016 level?  I don’t know. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Heisy said:

Remember it could always be worst, check out the difference on the snow map for this event just 3 days out lol
480db7aff367c2e0940d8f2fe08b4957.jpg

fbf9fd46250a5d01e2bdce85972a9369.jpg


.

See, this is what I mean by the models not being able to “see” past the cutters. We have one in progress that’s powerful enough to induce planetary wave breaking , and its interfering with the usual skill level of models even 3 days out. 

It’s like standing on a beach and normally, you can see a couple of sets out towards the horizon that’ll bring plenty of fun rides to surfers in their lineup within a few minutes. 

But if an incoming wave is so high that it blocks your view of the horizon, you can’t see what’s coming until after that wave breaks. Similar idea. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ji said:


The only person who I remember badgering pro Mets was howie lol. I think most of were cautiously optimistic in the western burbs but knew the risks

The nam in its wheelhouse had a run giving us snow 24 hours before the storm!

When I started planning to go to Vermont when it was 3-4 days away that should have tipped you off how I really felt. Not just for DC but even my area!  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if you looked within the trends bad signs were showing then. We do run in cycles for snow. But from 2000 to 2016 we were in a congruence of a favorable Atlantic and pacific pattern.  Places north of us were getting way above normal snow. But we actually were below avg (by the historical numbers) during that stretch.
That period looks like Valhalla compared to recently. But it was bad if you compared it to previous periods where we got everything to line up. Look at the mean pattern from that period!
IMG_0877.png.719a406752636cf4262dbfa5de87451f.png
Warning sirens should have been going off when places to our north were running 150% of normal snow yet we were BELOW AVG even in that freaking amazing pattern for that period!  We should have had another period like the late 50s-60s then!  
 
So now we’re in a truly bad cycle with a mean long wave pattern that isn’t good. And in the past this would have been bad but just like the last good period wasn’t as good, this bad period is WORSE!  
 
We will get to another better cycle eventually. At some point the PDO and AMO will flip again. But the question is how much will our ability to snow have degraded by then?   How muted will that next cycle be. Is assuredly will be better than this. But does it even get back to that 2000-2016 level?  I don’t know. 

Not sure if it’s due to climate change but we had some incredibly bad luck in that window with miller bs…Dec 2000 March 2001 Jan 2005…Boxing Day where nyc would get 30 and we would get zero even if we were cold enough. We also had numerous coastals that we were too far west! That’s just bad luck!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ji said:


Give the gfs 2 more chances before the euro 12z run tomorrow. We have seen this movie plenty of times where the euro is only model showing snow

It’s always caves

The other models are more GFS like.  It's gonna cave tonight.   I wonder what they did to this model.  It literally is out there on it's own.  Crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...