Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,788
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Cabby
    Newest Member
    Cabby
    Joined

Jan Medium/Long Range Disco 2: Total Obliteration is Coming


Jebman
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

I looked again, and this new gfs run does seem slower and develops the storm later

Like you said until the cutter is out the way there will be more ebbs and flows. Having the cold available with the arctic boundary really helps us. I just can't see this missing us completely. Gut feelings says moderate storm. Fingers crossed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HighStakes said:

Like you said until the cutter is out the way there will be more ebbs and flows. Having the cold available with the arctic boundary really helps us. I just want see this missing us completely. Gut feelings says moderate storm. Fingers crossed.

Yeah, cold air shouldn’t be an issue this time. (i’m banking against the canadian)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

Actually looks a tad better at 132 than 18z.

Just saw that, its hinting at faster cyclogenesis once it passes the NC/VA latitude with a bigger precip shield. I feel better about what the ensembles show than the op, even though the op was a decent run (I probably overreacted at first lol)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

This is a better setup. I like this run

 

10 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Yeah, cold air shouldn’t be an issue this time. (i’m banking against the canadian)

 

5 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Long way to go, but that one has big dog potential

Agree. I love the setup for this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Terpeast said:

Just saw that, its hinting at faster cyclogenesis once it passes the NC/VA latitude with a bigger precip shield. I feel better about what the ensembles show than the op, even though the op was a decent run (I probably overreacted at first lol)

could the increased spread here be due to members starting to toss around different locations and timescales for cyclogenesis?
gfs-ememb_lowlocs_us_fh126_trend.thumb.gif.62df591d9681bfde03b0636d52309907.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

0z GEFS almost no difference at 120

I like the 0z GEFS more, and I liked the 18z GEFS a lot!  It has more members keying on that second wave...but actually has a cleaner phase and gets the coastal going sooner without that weird jump thing where the initial wave almost takes the boundary off and the low has to redevelop west.  That was a really messy progression on the op.  But the GEFS indicates a move towards the slower progression with the 3rd wave being dominant but a cleaner coastal development. 

If we actually can get the 3rd wave to work it has the highest upside.  Way less risk of a cutter or thermal issues, more room to amplify, stronger NS wave...  It moved towards a better scenario imo. 

I don't know what to make of the GGEM though, hopefully its just off on a tangent.  Not that unusual for the ggem. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Just saw that, its hinting at faster cyclogenesis once it passes the NC/VA latitude with a bigger precip shield. I feel better about what the ensembles show than the op, even though the op was a decent run (I probably overreacted at first lol)

you Ninja'd me.  But I agree the way the op went down was risky, it was stuck between keying on two waves and almost ran off with the first one.  It had to redevelop and jump west to pull off what it did, that's dangerous and even if everything showed that 12 hours out I would be nervous.  That is bust city right there.  But the GEFS suggests maybe the trailing wave can be dominant with a less messy development.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, baltosquid said:

could the increased spread here be due to members starting to toss around different locations and timescales for cyclogenesis?
gfs-ememb_lowlocs_us_fh126_trend.thumb.gif.62df591d9681bfde03b0636d52309907.gif

Looks to me as the spread is showing a potentially slower system with more stragglers behind the main group

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ji said:

Probably the biggest thing that got me excited about this winter was a Feb 2003 type storm. We get that I will call it a winter

Sent from my SM-A515U using Tapatalk
 

7 inches of sleet... was so diaspointed at first-but that turned to amazement at that much sleet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...