Sey-Mour Snow Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 8 minutes ago, CT Rain said: It would almost be worth it for Kevin's melt. 18" for NYC 0" for Kevin . hhahahah .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 A Cape and Islands jackpot would be worth it for the entertainment value on here. I’m sure at 0z the NAM will be amped again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3k vs 12k? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, metagraphica said: NWS with a WSW out for "Portions of southern Connecticut, northeast New Jersey and southeast New York." 5-8" fits with my thinking unless we get the NAMMY. Like saying I am marrying my high school sweetie unless I get the troll under the bridge. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Box not biting here. Looks like they are thinking a non event south and east of Boston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, weathafella said: 3k vs 12k? 3k crushes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Box not biting here. Looks like they are thinking a non event south and east of Boston Looks reasonable to me. It’s still early anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Box not biting here. Looks like they are thinking a non event south and east of Boston They did say "Greatest uncertainty I95 south and east" with of course the exception of the Cape and Islands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 13 minutes ago, Henry's Weather said: Preface: not a met, subject to error. WAA= warm air advection. This mode of precipitation is caused by warm front mechanics, generally. Warm air moving northward. Pre-mature cyclone. CCB: cold conveyor belt. This type of snow is a result of cyclonic curvature funneling moist air into the dendrite-forming column in the atmosphere on the cold side of a system. It occurs during the strengthening of a cyclone to near peak strength and continues once it reaches maturity. subject to correction What's the difference between a CCB and a TROWAL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 18z RGEM gone wild Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 19 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: I laugh at the attention you guys give the NAM. At this range I seriously only trust the RGEM/Euro on a system like this...obviously the GFS is gonna over torch the BL among other problems the NAM/ICON/UKMET just cannot be trusted for various reasons...by this time tomorrow we can probably begin to trust the NAM somewhat 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I'm guessing they're just taking the NAM and paying it no mind. After the winter storm watches that are hoisted for Southern New England, they have the winter storm watch going from Saturday evening all the way through late Sunday night. Night. So I guess they expect the snow to continue through the day Sunday and to Sunday night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, Go Kart Mozart said: What's the difference between a CCB and a TROWAL? Trough of warm air aloft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 RGEM with the 8 to 14 banding sig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 7 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Looks reasonable to me. It’s still early anyways. Meh, 2” in se Mass is low. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: 18z RGEM gone wild Reggie shows us how to link the WAA and CCB stuff. Results in a widespread major storm. That’s kind of the optimal look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I don’t hate the wbz/fischer map. Seems to keep a lot of the warming confined close to the water Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Meh, 2” in se Mass is low. Just my opinion. There will be more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kazimirkai Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 One thing I notice about the nam comparing the models at 48hrs (which includes 3km, rdps etc.) is that compared too all other 18z models and 12z ones that came out earlier, the 12km has the weakest low pressure. Maybe that lends credence to the idea of it being somewhat of an outlier? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 11 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: 3k crushes My point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 9 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Trough of warm air aloft Well yes, I know what the acronym stands for. I was wondering about the physical differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Reggie shows us how to link the WAA and CCB stuff. Results in a widespread major storm. That’s kind of the optimal look. That separation deal reminds me somewhat of a scaled-down December 2003, where we had a warm thump, 12 hour break, then a cold blizzard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3km at hr60Sent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 18z ReggieSent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 The RGEM isn't even all that far fetched. All the models are trending closer to the trailing vort phasing nicely. I love a storm that matures and closes off at the mid levels right at our longitude. 9 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Congrats reggie. You received a huge contract after your 2015 season but you turned into a bench bat and sunflower seed distributor the past 8yrs. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Props to Kevin for naming rgem “reggie” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kazimirkai Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 At what point are short range models more important to look at than the GFS and EURO? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 55 minutes ago, Sandstorm94 said: Ew Sent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk lol that’s about par for the course here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, kazimirkai said: At what point are short range models more important to look at than the GFS and EURO? RGEM can be pretty good now inside 54-60. The NAM IMO is junk beyond 36-48. the 3km really is only good inside of 30. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now