HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, weathafella said: CMC is a huge qpf bomb If I could lock it I would. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boston Bulldog Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, HIPPYVALLEY said: OK. That is good info! Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said: This was the feedback I was looking for and hope to recall in future There is a reason why there is so much concern about convection ruining phasing dynamics in some potential high end bombs off the coast. Threading the needle isn't easy. This setup seems "messy" enough that boring background dynamics should win the day and get this thing up the coast without convective issues. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, George001 said: The gfs went south a bit, but the Canadian went even more north. Low is also deepening to the high 980s GFS IS 988 Too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: It’s putting all that emphasis on the lead short wave, which it holds the identity of longer… It has virtually no interaction with the second wave Was a violent but shorter pounding it seemed . Was over by 1pm into E mass 18z-0z panel had nada precip except .1 over Eastern half Essex county Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Wow the Canadian is a pummeling here. Holy smokes. Starts as paste and gets colder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Wow the Canadian is a pummeling here. Holy smokes. Starts as paste and gets colder Probably delusional but it would get mid-level magic into CNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NittanyWx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Fun to see the 3 operational models all have different ideas on how to handle that trailing vort interaction. First bit of sampling out west and that's become an increasingly interesting feature. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Gfs bombing out late gives the outer cape the good stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 The CMC doesn’t really put much emphasis on the trailing wave though. Everything else seems to incorporate that trailing wave. CMC behind some on this evolution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said: Probably delusional but it would get mid-level magic into CNE. Yeah, that’s a burial. CNE absolutely gets in on it with the low that far north. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, WinterWolf said: The CMC doesn’t really put much emphasis on the trailing wave though. Everything else seems to incorporate that trailing wave. CMC behind some on this evolution? The front running wave is much stronger on the GGEM so it never really allows the trailer to crash the party. It keeps the downstream ridging in front of the trailer to a min. But when the front runner is that potent, you still get a big solution. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 8 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said: Was a violent but shorter pounding it seemed . Was over by 1pm into E mass 18z-0z panel had nada precip except .1 over Eastern half Essex county Our current weather paradigm over the past decade says, always plan on the system lifting out faster than modeled. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 Yeah, I don’t know… With a growing consensus heading another direction vs the CMC’s track record … that’s a bit of a buyer’s beware solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, CoastalWx said: Lynnfield did well. They must have had 18 easily. I saw pics from my wife’s family who lives there. North shore in laws, rough. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said: Yeah, I don’t know… With a growing consensus heading another direction vs the CMC’s track record … that’s a bit of a buyer’s beware solution Agree. The good news is though, there seems to be multiple ways we can get it “done”, which is a complete reversal of the past couple winters. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: The front running wave is much stronger on the GGEM so it never really allows the trailer to crash the party. It keeps the downstream ridging in front of the trailer to a min. But when the front runner is that potent, you still get a big solution. Thanks Will, but I understood that part about the leading shortwave being strong, my point was that the CMC isn’t incorporating that trailing wave as the other varsity models seem to be, and perhaps it’s a flawed solution due to that fact, and perhaps not prudent to take it to seriously because of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry's Weather Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 More of an omega block on 0z versus 18z, should be more tucked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannynyc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 GEFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 47 minutes ago, MJO812 said: Congrats guys Went from a few inches down here to rain. Still waiting for an inch of snow. Will be near 700 days soon. Idk how u live in NYC, regardless of snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderblizzard Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 The GEFS seem like a pretty solid improvement from 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry's Weather Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuddyWx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I’ll take that from the GEFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kazimirkai Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, mannynyc said: GEFS Much better handle than the 12z. Maybe the new sounding input influencing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Thunderblizzard said: The GEFS seem like a pretty solid improvement from 18z. Some massive hits scattered in there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry's Weather Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Amped. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Quite a few nam like solutions there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuddyWx Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Improvement for sure, juiced up from 18z 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Some massive hits scattered in there Some rainers for sema too. I guess ya gotta play with fire if you want the high end outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, MuddyWx said: Improvement for sure, juiced up from 18z That’s impressive for a mean. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 GEFS is actually steadily trending towards the kicker S/W phasing with the trough and creating its own axis of PVA. this would have pretty big implications for you guys and even down here into LI/LHV/NNJ 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now