WinterWolf Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 2 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said: I misread your post. I thought you said it was a decade since you had a good storm. Reading comp ftl Lol..sneaking some baileys in the coffee this morning there Mr Hubb. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Just now, Snowcrazed71 said: In what way? It's funny. I was just thinking about the NAM that we haven't talked about it or brought it into any of the conversations with any storms as of late. That’s because it only goes out to 84 hrs…so it’s just coming into range now. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 4 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: not that it means much but big changes on the NAM it may be the first by virtue of running first, but picking the first to gather the physical sounding 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said: it may be the first by virtue of running first, but picking the first to gather the physical sounding yup definitely more amped this run 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 6 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: That’s because it only goes out to 84 hrs…so it’s just coming into range now. Yeah... It's been so long that I forgot .lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 4 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: yup definitely more amped this run Yep but still crappy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Yep but still crappy Baby steps...Sent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 5 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: yup definitely more amped this run mm, not sure I'm seeing 'more amped' ...only out to hr 30 though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Just now, Typhoon Tip said: mm, not sure I'm seeing 'more amped' ...only out to hr 30 though its out to hr 84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 gosh .. it almost seems it'd be better if the whole jet stream lifted N because with that high up there and that running over top would probably ignite a general region of isentropic lift snows - generate an event out of generic overrunning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 mm, not sure I'm seeing 'more amped' ...only out to hr 30 though12km is already out to 84Sent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, ineedsnow said: its out to hr 84 tropical tidbits is not a very good site for timely updating I've noticed - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 NAM would actually have the storm on the kicker wave....the front runner gets ground up so much that it isn't able to sweep away the baroclinic zone with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Just now, Typhoon Tip said: tropical tidbits is not a very good site for timely updating I've noticed - its out hit refresh lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ariof Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 24 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Jan 7th 2022 repeat? Without 51° two days before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 If that's amped that's pretty sad. You can't even find a kink in the isohypses of the remnant s/w. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 okay I see it - yeah that solution may (if not likely) just the NAM being the NAM. But it's putting all the emphasis on the trailing S/W. In fact, extrapolating that 84 hour frame would argue that's enough mechanical power there to trigger some sort of NJ model low response out of that thing alone. But as far as the lead, it's all but completely damping it out of existence due to wave space/destructive interference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 I wouldn't use the NAM for this system if the NAM was the last model available. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said: NAM would actually have the storm on the kicker wave....the front runner gets ground up so much that it isn't able to sweep away the baroclinic zone with it. And I'm not even sure I'd trust that to survive with the big dog digging in on its heels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 man - this is annoying. It seems I keep seeing model renditions of this POS that match my discussion points, while they're not actually picking one of them and f'ing sticking with it. I said this morning that this NAM extrapolation -type look would be possible. I gave it some 20 or 30% chance and then here we are, a model goes ahead and maps that out. But this has happened to all of us this week with this thing. It's all shot gun solutions still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 2 minutes ago, dendrite said: And I'm not even sure I'd trust that to survive with the big dog digging in on its heels. HAHA... Just said that exact same thing in my head. It's like we're relaying destructive interference backward in the flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 2 hours ago, CoastalWx said: Been almost two years since I grabbed a 4 spot lol. Was that why we stopped having GTGs? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 I love this place. “It’s amped” “it’s flat” “it doesn’t even exist” “it’s the trailing wave” 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 I noticed the euro sort of did that. Basically caught up with the dampening s/w. Almost became like a speed max type s/w but did curl up once it got to SNE. All the while though heights were falling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, OceanStWx said: Was that why we stopped having GTGs? It’s because you never came. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 man - this is annoying. It seems I keep seeing renditions of this POS that match my discussion points, while not actually picking one of them and f'ing sticking with it. I said this morning this that this NAM extrapolation -type look would be possible. I gave it some 20 or 30% chance and then here we are, a model goes ahead and maps that out. But this has happened to all of us this week with this thing. It's all shot gun solutions stillThis SOB is playing Russian Roulette with every model, every run, *and* the ensemble suites, can't say the last time I have seen this play out because at this time frame something starts to stick outSent from my SM-S146VL using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 hour ago, Ginx snewx said: It's important to look at these panels like Ginxy has here. The ensemble means may look nice, but don't tell the whole story. Like for Mount Tolland for instance, the EPS mean is about 5.5 inches. But the 25th/75th range is 1.5 to 8.5 inches. So some bigger members are dragging the mean up, while the floor still remains quite low. When you can start setting the floor higher, that's when you can start honking for a storm. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 4 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: It's important to look at these panels like Ginxy has here. The ensemble means may look nice, but don't tell the whole story. Like for Mount Tolland for instance, the EPS mean is about 5.5 inches. But the 25th/75th range is 1.5 to 8.5 inches. So some bigger members are dragging the mean up, while the floor still remains quite low. When you can start setting the floor higher, that's when you can start honking for a storm. ^ an aspect that is like radiation trying to get through lead helmet on top of Mount Tolland, no doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 Ha... looks like Brian and Will and I all keyed on the same aspect at the same time re the NAM Which was done for fun. at least I hope ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Reggie has a decent look at 84h with the leading s/w. Looks like it holds enough mechanics together. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now