Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chargers10
    Newest Member
    Chargers10
    Joined

Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, the_other_guy said:

I think the last one I could remember was Christmas day like in the early 2000s

 

It is very rare

there was a much smaller version of that in the late 90s as well. I’m gonna say 1998.

The 2nd March 2018 storm started as heavy rain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Backend snow with a CCB would happen if the 500mb low closes off SE of us, which transports moisture around west of the low. Without it it’s likely progressive and wouldn’t amount to much. GFS looks nice but I’d believe that when I see it. 

Lack of sun matters so much for how it feels out; just came in from tossing the ball to the dogs and it has that "snowy" feel to it outside. Fingers are numb. Temp is 42 but it feels a lot colder. Would be nice to swing something out of this, nothing worse than cold rain. But not confident; winter has too much of a 90s feel to it. Totally unscientific, of course.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ForestHillWx said:

The ensembles haven’t moved much for my area; arguably they have increased chances for significant snows.

MMU and points north/west should be in the game. 

I’m in Morristown and right in the line. Either way ratios will be very low but would be nice to see flakes fly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Newman said:

Verbatim on the GFS, the Pats game at 1 and Giants game at 4:30 would be fun on Sunday

Would it be the first time an NFL game was delayed due to ligntning in a snow storm ? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BoulderWX said:

This is hilarious and without any support. Also be careful with 10:1 as many have stated before, looking closer to 5/6:1 along coast and other marginal areas. 

RGEM wasn't terrible for the coast but yes needs more support to be believable. Hopefully the Euro shows some improvement in less than an hour though it's prob a long shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ILoveWinter said:

RGEM wasn't terrible for the coast but yes needs more support to be believable. Hopefully the Euro shows some improvement in less than an hour though it's prob a long shot. 

um RGEM hardly shows much at the coast? you gotta be NW of white plains, etc for anything over 3”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, forkyfork said:

with such strong energy coming into the west behind our system it will be difficult for the mid levels to close off in time for the northeast to get widespread double digits imo

 

image.thumb.png.139498c3e6fc4321d0ec05bb8cf69931.png

i still think this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...