Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

January 2024 -- Discussion


moneypitmike
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I like my spot for that....for the same reason that I sometimes get porked by those dry air corridors flowing down from Maine during CJ events.

I'm always onboard with an overrunning event up here, We do well in them generally speaking.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

One thing I don't mind about CC is the increased frequency of larger events at the expense of currier and ives shit. Sign me up for that....I am okay with missing out on days like Tuesday in favor of more like January 7th even if the overall total drops a bit.

..I disagree.  I've always like the smaller events in addition to the larger events.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

One thing I don't mind about CC is the increased frequency of larger events at the expense of currier and ives shit. Sign me up for that....I am okay with missing out on days like Tuesday in favor of more like January 7th even if the overall total drops a bit.

I argue with myself about that. I really like events like Tuesdays. I would happily take a solid day or three of snow only accumulating 8 inches "days and days:lol:" over a large event if it happened fairly consistent throughout the season... but ask me again in six months

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnitedWx said:

I argue with myself about that. I really like events like Tuesdays. I would happily take a solid day or three of snow only accumulating 8 inches "days and days:lol:" over a large event if it happened fairly consistent throughout the season... but ask me again in six months

If the timing were better, sure...but yesterday right during the day following a holiday...not quite bad enough to get the day off, but bad enough to be a nuisance....eh.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

If the timing were better, sure...but yesterday right during the day following a holiday...not quite bad enough to get the day off, but bad enough to be a nuisance....eh.

Well nuisance, it's only a nuisance when the snow blower's shit the bed... but I fixed that. Thank God for garage heat! And well, well.. look at that high pressure flexing for next Wednesday. That has a nice look

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, coastals are hit and miss for us, but SWFE/overrunning usually have a high floor here.....though I def need a stronger high than you do.

Yes, Especially Miller A's,  Im not to crazy about them, Better down south for them as there LBSW before here if they even make it up here, But i won't kick a Miller B to the curb either up here.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

It would be nice to make lemonade from a lemon set up, instead of making lactose intolerant rhea from a hot fudge Sundae set up for once.

Has not been very many events that have panned out over that last few years in a positive way outside of a few days ago's event.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UnitedWx said:

Well nuisance, it's only a nuisance when the snow blower's shit the bed... but I fixed that. Thank God for garage heat! And well, well.. look at that high pressure flexing for next Wednesday. That has a nice look

I afforded myself an "out clause" next week in yesterday's blog.... :lol:

However, the primary difference between this milder period and the stretch earlier in the season is that the higher heights should be focused across the northeastern CONUS, as dictated by the aforementioned tropical forcing. The is in sharp contrast to the period in December, in which a potent Pacific jet eradicated the entire North American continent  of cold air.
 
AVvXsEjPClDoDgQhUlyNl__MigzJDvWMG9m6oT5k

This means that while the pattern will certainly grow much milder, the cold air source will remain nearby and thus wintry threats cannot be ruled out
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I like my spot for that....for the same reason that I sometimes get porked by those dry air corridors flowing down from Maine during CJ events.

Yeah. Closer to the high. Should still work okay in the Berks, but a changeover will arrive sooner.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dryslot said:

Nickels and dimes events can work like the GFS has, Better then the alternative.

Lewiston Maine. Sure.

But the op runs with the -NAO look, with snow potential into coastal SNE are just evil. The ops notoriously lag the teleconnection shifts, but this lag is likely especially pronounced given the unusual spike we're seeing in both the NAO and AO indexes. 

It's a shit pattern that will produce shit, except north of the wall. The GEFS and EPS are much more reliable here, even at 5 days.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

Lewiston Maine. Sure.

But the op runs with the -NAO look, with snow potential into coastal SNE are just evil. The ops notoriously lag the teleconnection shifts, but this lag is likely especially pronounced given the unusual spike we're seeing in both the NAO and AO indexes. 

It's a shit pattern that will produce shit, except north of the wall. The GEFS and EPS are much more reliable here, even at 5 days.

Maybe you end up correct, but this latitude can do just fine with a +AO/NAO and cold Canada......December 2007 is a perfect example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

Lewiston Maine. Sure.

But the op runs with the -NAO look, with snow potential into coastal SNE are just evil. The ops notoriously lag the teleconnection shifts, but this lag is likely especially pronounced given the unusual spike we're seeing in both the NAO and AO indexes. 

It's a shit pattern that will produce shit, except north of the wall. The GEFS and EPS are much more reliable here, even at 5 days.

Climatologically, there tends to be a few events like this every winter.  In many, the wall is south of much of New England.  Time will tell but there is potential for wintry qpf in a lot of places that should be torching.  We'll see how it plays out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Maybe you end up correct, but this latitude can do just fine with a +AO/NAO and cold Canada......December 2007 is a perfect example.

I think the better argument is if the MJO and forecasted teles are wrong....

 

If they're right and you bake this into the op runs with that general longwave pattern, it's ugly. Very much like that 6z EPS evolution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

I think the better argument is if the MJO and forecasted teles are wrong....

 

If they're right and you bake this into the op runs with that general longwave pattern, it's ugly. Very much like that 6z EPS evolution. 

TBH, I won't be surprised if I see 100% rain or 100% snow...not very insightful, I know...but just depends where the boundary sets up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

I think the better argument is if the MJO and forecasted teles are wrong....

 

If they're right and you bake this into the op runs with that general longwave pattern, it's ugly. Very much like that 6z EPS evolution. 

You definitely do not want the GEFS idea today of it re-emerging in 3 to be correct...its better for it to just go totally dormant and do nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Since 2016, sure.....like we had bad luck in the 80s/early 90s and late 90's, too. Again, need a larger sample size.

I agree, sample size needs to be bigger, maybe this is all a bad memory in a few years and we can go back to arguing about jackpots....But was it bad luck during those other periods or just a bad pattern? CC has accelerated, but was still a factor back then as well, so who knows....Hopefully the GFS has a clue about next week, would finally be something that is in our favor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spanks45 said:

I agree, sample size needs to be bigger, maybe this is all a bad memory in a few years and we can go back to arguing about jackpots....But was it bad luck during those other periods or just a bad pattern? CC has accelerated, but was still a factor back then as well, so who knows....Hopefully the GFS has a clue about next week, would finally be something that is in our favor

Usually both...I think the late 90's were genuinely worse than the 80s, which had some bad luck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...