Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

January 2024 -- Discussion


moneypitmike
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I don't think much differently considering those archaic models were virtually locked on for nearly a week leading in. It was a such a strong signal.

What a crazy storm -- we're lucky to have witnessed it. A virtual max-out of our atmosphere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RDRY said:

I'd be fascinated to see how today's forecast models would handle the March Superstorm a week out.

I think it would be handled differently…just in the aspect that the models are So Sensitive now, they weren’t 30 yrs ago. That’s my take. I think the sensitivity now is what has a lot to do with some of the jumping around compared to before..

 

Sure, It would no doubt sniff it out. But How consistent would be interesting to see? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RDRY said:

I'd be fascinated to see how today's forecast models would handle the March Superstorm a week out.

Storm of the Century marked a milestone in the weather forecasting of the United States. By March 8, 1993, several operational numerical weather prediction models and medium-range forecasters at the United States National Weather Service recognized the threat of a significant snowstorm. This marked the first time National Weather Service meteorologists were able to predict accurately a system's severity five days in advance

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

It’s one run. And of course it’s always track dependent…no matter if it’s below zero or not, you know that. 

Everyone should... but so many forget lol. That verbatim would make many happy however, lets see how many more dozen times it morphs around now

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnitedWx said:

Everyone should... but so many forget lol. That verbatim would make many happy however, lets see how many more dozen times it morphs around now

Yes sir. Ya that’s a good hit right there for most.  If That takes an ever so slightly more east track, then it’s game on for the coast too.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I've been on these boards a very long time and yet the hear someone say, "Boy, The CMC really nailed this one"..............:lol:

Right…it isn’t very good at all. Agreed.
 

And if it does have the right idea, it’ll flop around after that, and look different by the time the storm arrives. It’s always lost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I've been on these boards a very long time and yet the hear someone say, "Boy, The CMC really nailed this one"..............:lol:

It has to work for the Canadians though, right?  Maybe it's good at predicting sea ice in Hudson Bay off Churchill or drizzle in Vancouver.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...