Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

December Mid/Long Range Discussion


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

So for argument’s sake, let’s say the ensembles are currently correct and we get a mean trough over us around Xmas or so. How far off is that from expectations 10 days ago? A couple days? Maybe 5 at most? Rough outcome for the never ending torch crowd. 

The narrative will change to 'we told you most of the country would see above average temps'.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

i can pretty much guarantee that if we see a strong -NAO there could be a prolific period as long as the Pacific isn’t absolute garbage. we are seeing a strong STJ and zero indication of any persistent SE ridging 

Sure, but that is not what I trying to talk about.  Ralph said "a good PAC can overcome a meh Atlantic".  I agree that can be true for a nice EPO/PNA dominant pattern, especially down in my neck of the woods since the dry arctic cold of a direct -EPO shot can sometimes move the storm track right over me with cold air.

But in an east-based nino a "good" pacific is one that almost always has some tendency inject Pacific air, and the -NAO appears to be critical in modulating that.  So what i am trying to say is that I am not sure a good east-based nino Pacific can overcome a meh Atlantic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cbmclean said:

Sure, but that is not what I trying to talk about.  Ralph said "a good PAC can overcome a meh Atlantic".  I agree that can be true for a nice EPO/PNA dominant pattern, especially down in my neck of the woods since the dry arctic cold of a direct -EPO shot can sometimes move the storm track right over me with cold air.

But in an east-based nino a "good" pacific is one that almost always has some tendency inject Pacific air, and the -NAO appears to be critical in modulating that.  So what i am trying to say is that I am not sure a good east-based nino Pacific can overcome a meh Atlantic. 

yeah, you’re probably correct there. those years usually don’t have amazing Pacific patterns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

yeah, you’re probably correct there. those years usually don’t have amazing Pacific patterns

Well I was assuming he was talking about "nino good" which is good in the sense that it has a strong STJ and promotes east coast troughing, which is great as long as there is enough cold air to mix with the moisture.

If he was just referring to the generic EPO/PNA good then i agree 100%.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

“actually Nunavut is gonna be +20 so nobody cares if it’s -1 along the EC” as it’s literally snowing 

Speaking of that, has anyone been paying attention to the trends on the JCI (Jet "Chill" Index)?  Are we still on track to get it to calm down a bit so the source regions can start to recover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, clskinsfan said:

PSU said something a couple of pages back about it. We get flooded with PAC air constantly now. We will see over the next couple of months if ENSO means anything anymore. 

It's not just the Pacific air itself. It's the flow that blocks the cold from getting out of Siberia (it's been f'ing cold as Dante's hell there), across Canada, and down into our neck of the woods.

We've been dealing with the flow for quite a few years now, but there's nothing to say that it's something that won't change again within another few years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CAPE said:

It's not there on the GEFS, and the track looks too far N/inland. EPS suggests a track right along/off the coast with HP to the NW, LP over Atlantic Canada. Surface temps are colder. Long way out so plenty can change but we are gonna need some cold for this not to be just another rain event.

1703721600-uWKwXoSI4PE.png

Wouldn’t that argue that we need a cold push that doesn’t have the steam to make it too far out over those warm waters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Speaking of that, has anyone been paying attention to the trends on the JCI (Jet "Chill" Index)?  Are we still on track to get it to calm down a bit so the source regions can start to recover.

to be honest, I think that some of the source region stuff is a bit overrated. yes, we would prefer Canada to be cold, but that is usually not the case in El Ninos, even the prolific ones. for example, look at Feb 2010! there was +10-15C air right over SE Canada. made no difference. same with Feb 1987, Canada is torched

YhXNd20xFR.png.d8423be49293fd4872d70975a2f8d777.png

XQW0xyF3Iv.png.05ad62496e6bd6b65e4b38d58738d735.png

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GATECH said:

How much snow did DCA get from Jan 3, 2022....I am 11 miles south of DCA and got 11" and am pretty sure we were upgraded to a WSW from a WWA.

 

3 minutes ago, weatherbook said:

D.C. had a winter storm warning on Jan 3, 2022.  I measured about 8" at the Tidal Basin.  It was a classic D.C. snowstorm.

 

TidalBasin4-lr.jpg

Thanks for the clarification! I love the iembot website, but sometimes there are a few data holes, especially when NWS changes from advisory -> warning during the event.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, nw baltimore wx said:

Does that upper level feature rotating through Monday night/early Tuesday on the gfs have any potential?  Looks lame on the surface but not too bad on the upper level panels.

yeah looks potent on 500mb. upslope snow in the blue ridge, maybe some inverted trough snow inland in new england when the surface low actually develops (too late for us). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, nw baltimore wx said:

Does that upper level feature rotating through Monday night/early Tuesday on the gfs have any potential?  Looks lame on the surface but not too bad on the upper level panels.

That upper level feature helps to enhance upslope for the mountains at the very least.  I'm not smart enough to say what it means for east of the mountains.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, weatherbook said:

D.C. had a winter storm warning on Jan 3, 2022.  I measured about 8" at the Tidal Basin.  It was a classic D.C. snowstorm.

 

TidalBasin4-lr.jpg

Beautiful shot! And a nice event, that one had a sharp cutoff just to my south where I only saw virga due to the very dry air on the north fringe, but it plastered ACY IIRC. I did better in the following event and then at the end of the month for my main snow that month. 

But 8 inches is a very nice event in an otherwise poor stretch. 

Really pulling for the megalopolis to have a good winter this year. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mattie g said:

It's not just the Pacific air itself. It's the flow that blocks the cold from getting out of Siberia (it's been f'ing cold as Dante's hell there), across Canada, and down into our neck of the woods.

We've been dealing with the flow for quite a few years now, but there's nothing to say that it's something that won't change again within another few years.

I don't really think that actual cross-polar flow (from Siberia) is super common for us or that it is the normal way we get "good cold".  My understanding is our normal cold source region is the Mackenzie river valley area.

And while agree that the Pac Puke has been more common over the last 7 years than before, we the CONUS several notable cold air outbreaks in that time.  Unfortunately it seems that most of them have been targeted at the middle of CONUS, perhaps as a result of the persistent SER over those years.  For example the great southern plains outbreak of 2021 which nearly brought the power grid to its knees.  Back in late 2017 early 2018 we had an epic cold snap that set records in terms of duration of below 32 °F.  I even hit 0 F at my house in the coastal plain which is almost unheard of.  

As usual it is a matter of degree and probability.  Pac Puke is more common than it used to be.  But it is not universal.

ETA: I mean the NC coastal plain; yes I am a spy from the SE forum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

For fun, go look at the 500 map for the US for Monday on the 12z run from Mon 12/11 and compare it to the same time on todays run and then tell me why one would place any hope/despair on an op run beyond about 3 days. 

I did that.  quite a bit different each run.  10 days until Xmas.  Anything could happen that day.  Just the 2m temps have gone from the 30s to now the 50s in 3-4 runs for 18z 25 Dec.  Who knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

not sure how anyone can see these kinds of setups and not get excited about the rest of the winter. loaded southern stream showing up later in the month. wait until we get a legit -NAO to establish a 50/50 ULL and you're golden

gfs_z500_vort_us_50.thumb.png.88c182c1813234bec5b75e7d2cfed096.png

I'll get excited when I see the jet extension chill a bit.

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

not sure how anyone can see these kinds of setups and not get excited about the rest of the winter. loaded southern stream showing up later in the month. wait until we get a legit -NAO to establish a 50/50 ULL and you're golden

gfs_z500_vort_us_50.thumb.png.88c182c1813234bec5b75e7d2cfed096.png

Hey that's a better look out west. We'll establish ridge along the west coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Maestrobjwa said:

I actually wasn't sure it had something to do with that or not. I keep seeing folks say the artic air is "kicked" or "trapped" on the other side of the globe...Now from a layman perspective, I thought that implied there was another mechanism that did that. So you're saying all the pac air kicks the colder air to the other side of the hemisphere, or?

And from that same perspective...I also don't get how "that" problem means warm or our side of the hemisphere but still cold there. May be a dumb question, but remember...non-scientifically oriented poster here. Sometimes we need a "for dummies" explanation of these things!

First of all, the reason Siberia can get so cold is it is a much larger land mass and sheltered from any marine influence.  It is much further and the body of water that is typically upstream from them is the north Atlantic which is much smaller and cooler than the pacific.  

Second, the predominant longwave pattern or flow.  Look at this below.

PacJet.thumb.png.d7bd4598c1a16afdb30468df3e8d2cc3.png

I have highlighted the pac jet there.  How would any cold from Siberia be able to get here given that flow...cross polar flow is completely cut off by the pac jet blasting across N America.  Furthermore how would our source regions even be able to develop home grown cold with that flow blasting warm pacific air across the whole continent.  

It is not always cold in Siberia, well WRT normal anyways... right now it is...see belowTemps1.thumb.png.c2a1ddeb4e550ae4663e888c4d2c5218.png

But the flow shifts and becomes more progressive and that cold is forced out into the pacific and quickly gets obliterated as it mixes with the pacific maritime airmass...so look at next week

Temps4.thumb.png.730cb012df393442b55e9daff278034b.png

It's now warm in Siberia, but its still not cold here its just warm EVERYWHERE...literally the only cold in the whole hemisphere WRT normal are two small pockets over Greeenland and Alaska, both of which are under a TPV at the time.  90% of the land masses across the whole N Hem is well above normal.  

As for your other questions regarding how much of this is random v "you know what".  I can't say.  I can say the pacific pattern which is responsible for this is partially cyclical.  We are in a hostile PDO cycle.  But I can also say that there are some factors contributing to this which make it worse which have been linked to "you know what".  The expansion of the pacific basin circulation which is linked to warming has compressed the jet speeding it up making the problem worse.  The warm pools in the western Pac/IO are making this worse and also linked to warming.  And of course as the pacific warms that's going to be a problem since that is what is upstream of us.   I have no idea what percentage of this is just cyclical and what percentage might be warming but its likely some of both.  

 

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

First of all, the reason Siberia can get so cold is it is a much larger land mass and sheltered from any marine influence.  It is much further and the body of water that is typically upstream from them is the north Atlantic which is much smaller and cooler than the pacific.  

Second, the predominant longwave pattern or flow.  Look at this below.

PacJet.thumb.png.d7bd4598c1a16afdb30468df3e8d2cc3.png

I have highlighted the pac jet there.  How would any cold from Siberia be able to get here given that flow...cross polar flow is completely cut off by the pac jet blasting across N America.  Furthermore how would our source regions even be able to develop home grown cold with that flow blasting warm pacific air across the whole continent.  

It is not always cold in Siberia, well WRT normal anyways... right now it is...see belowTemps1.thumb.png.c2a1ddeb4e550ae4663e888c4d2c5218.png

But the flow shifts and becomes more progressive and that cold is forced out into the pacific and quickly gets obliterated as it mixes with the pacific maritime airmass...so look at next week

Temps4.thumb.png.730cb012df393442b55e9daff278034b.png

It's now warm in Siberia, but its still not cold here its just warm EVERYWHERE...literally the only cold in the whole hemisphere WRT normal are two small pockets over Greeenland and Alaska, both of which are under a TPV at the time.  90% of the land masses across the whole N Hem is well above normal.  

As for your other questions regarding how much of this is random v "you know what".  I can't say.  I can say the pacific pattern which is responsible for this is partially cyclical.  We are in a hostile PDO cycle.  But I can also say that there are some factors contributing to this which make it worse which have been linked to "you know what".  The expansion of the pacific basin circulation which is linked to warming has compressed the jet speeding it up making the problem worse.  The warm pools in the western Pac/IO are making this worse and also linked to warming.  I have no idea what percentage of this is just cyclical and what percentage might be warming but its likely some of both.  

 

 

This post has me back to thinking we are seeing illusions on the long-range good looks. LOL! Need more luck than usual to get stuff to do what we need it to do these days! Thanks for the breakdown... now I will breakdown! :( LOL! 

 

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...