Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,701
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sfagewi
    Newest Member
    Sfagewi
    Joined

December Mid/Long Range Discussion


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Ji said:


lol it’s the first day of the pattern change. Jb is convinced that positive anomaly is moving west

So am I but unlike JB I don’t just assume I have to be right. I’ve been humbled by Mother Nature enough go know not to celebrate until it’s actually happening. We’ve seen step one sneak into day 15 a few times. I feel better when we actually see step 2-3 start progressing into range. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

blocking is pretty essential in Ninos and the models usually miss it at range unless it’s a classic pig retrograding Scandi ridge. the STJ undercutting Canadian blocking/ridging is usually how you score. they aren’t Arctic cold patterns, but they work

Ya and I’m optimistic but some are downplaying the degradation of the nao look on guidance. That’s the key though imo. The equation we need doesn’t work without blocking.  Positive nao ninos are mostly awful. Luckily they are also fairly rare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

So am I but unlike JB I don’t just assume I have to be right. I’ve been humbled by Mother Nature enough go know not to celebrate until it’s actually happening. We’ve seen step one sneak into day 15 a few times. I feel better when we actually see step 2-3 start progressing into range. 

Not a pessimist nor optimist but, a realist :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Welcome to 3 pages ago. Let me know when you hear about Elvis. 

He still lives and no one can tell me any different!!

In other news, a link for the curious to the CPS MJO weekly write-up

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/mjoupdate.pdf

Summary: there is a disagreement between the dynamical models which predict the wave dies (potentially due to destructive interference from a CCKW in the Indian Ocean), and the "RMM forecast" which favor continuation of the wave into 7 and beyond.  

Not sure what entity/model is the "RMM forecast" other than the models, but I sure hope they are right.  I've heard many people that the models tend to kill waves too quickly so maybe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1973 with a warmer Atlantic would probably be a 2-3 month window of very powerful, wet storms, with marginal cold for a lot of the Eastern US.  You'd force a lot of the fluke super cold/strong storms to the north with southern heat already building up from the south. Atlantic was frigid in the early 1970s. 

1972-73 is the snowiest winter/cold season on record in a lot of interior West. I don't expect that this year, but it's a pretty special winter for a lot of the country, including the southern US.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Weather Will said:

WB 18Z GEFS, looking for a chilly Christmas?  South Florida, Cuba and the Yucatán!

IMG_2299.png

Again, 2-3 degrees warmer than average isn’t warm in late December.  And what does the 2 degree departure from average over an entire week have to do with discrete snow chances?  What were the average temp anomalies for the week where I just got 2.7” and much of this board got 1-4”?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ji said:


emoji47.pngemoji3062.png

Keep in mind I can find a one week snapshot in some good nino years that look somewhat like that. 
Dec 1957

IMG_0357.gif.2e1f27fd31845ddbe35cbd8066fa3290.gif

Dec 1965

IMG_0356.gif.0e1ad57765f768dce16a5031b23fd03e.gif

Dec 1986

IMG_0355.gif.12f6784525943f53d8605734346c40e2.gif

It’s not the end of the world if a week in December looks like crap and resembles 1973/1992. The problem with those years was the whole winter was like that!  As I said before some good ninos had a stretch like this in Dec. The good/bad years diverged around new years. We will know soon how this is heading!  

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

1973 with a warmer Atlantic would probably be a 2-3 month window of very powerful, wet storms, with marginal cold for a lot of the Eastern US.  You'd force a lot of the fluke super cold/strong storms to the north with southern heat already building up from the south. Atlantic was frigid in the early 1970s. 

1972-73 is the snowiest winter/cold season on record in a lot of interior West. I don't expect that this year, but it's a pretty special winter for a lot of the country, including the southern US.

 

Yeah, was thinking similarly. Would possibly allow systems that tracked across the deep South then to travel further North. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

1973 with a warmer Atlantic would probably be a 2-3 month window of very powerful, wet storms, with marginal cold for a lot of the Eastern US.  You'd force a lot of the fluke super cold/strong storms to the north with southern heat already building up from the south. Atlantic was frigid in the early 1970s. 

1972-73 is the snowiest winter/cold season on record in a lot of interior West. I don't expect that this year, but it's a pretty special winter for a lot of the country, including the southern US.

 

 

7 minutes ago, Daniel Boone said:

Yeah, was thinking similarly. Would possibly allow systems that tracked across the deep South then to travel further North. 

Today’s raging pacific with that incredibly +AO is likely a disaster.  Next week on guidance doesn’t exactly look promising for snow.  Let’s just hope we don’t have to test that theory. 
 

1973, 1992 and 1995 failed primarily because the NAO/AO were positive. 1998 the AO/NAO flipped negative but the North Pac vortex was just out of control and flooded pac puke all winter regardless of the nao. 1998 was extremely east based though and combined with a colder pac profile around ENSO created maybe the greatest contrast which likely lead to the strength and displacement east of the pacific nino long wave pattern.  Other than 1998 which was an anomaly, the other analogs all fell in line snowy or not based on the NAO. 
 

1958, 1966, 1987, 2010 the NAO was negative. 
1973, 1992, 1995 the NAO was positive. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

 

Today’s raging pacific with that incredibly +AO is likely a disaster.  Next week on guidance doesn’t exactly look promising for snow.  Let’s just hope we don’t have to test that theory. 
 

1973, 1992 and 1995 failed primarily because the NAO/AO were positive. 1998 the AO/NAO flipped negative but the North Pac vortex was just out of control and flooded pac puke all winter regardless of the nao. 1998 was extremely east based though and combined with a colder pac profile around ENSO created maybe the greatest contrast which likely lead to the strength and displacement east of the pacific nino long wave pattern.  Other than 1998 which was an anomaly, the other analogs all fell in line snowy or not based on the NAO. 
 

1958, 1966, 1987, 2010 the NAO was negative. 
1973, 1992, 1995 the NAO was positive. 

Don Sutherland had some research on -NAO in November correlating to -NAO winters so.....i think we just need to fast forward 2 weeks so we can stop guessing lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ji said:

Don Sutherland had some research on -NAO in November correlating to -NAO winters so.....i think we just need to fast forward 2 weeks so we can stop guessing lol

Yeah man this is like watching a high stakes game where you are hiding your face because ya can't watch, yet keep looking with one eye, hoping for the best yet having the worst keep flashing before you too, lol The suspense is magnified given our recent stretch (if we'd done better the last 7 years it wouldn't feel as tense!)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah man this is like watching a high stakes game where you are hiding your face because ya can't watch, yet keep looking with one eye, hoping for the best yet having the worst keep flashing before you too, lol The suspense is magnified given our recent stretch (if we'd done better the last 7 years it wouldn't feel as tense!)
Psu is in mid-season form and it's terrifying. It's like falling off the titanic and someone hands you a napkin instead of life raft

Sent from my SM-A515U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • Haha 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Yeah man this is like watching a high stakes game where you are hiding your face because ya can't watch, yet keep looking with one eye, hoping for the best yet having the worst keep flashing before you too, lol The suspense is magnified given our recent stretch (if we'd done better the last 7 years it wouldn't feel as tense!)

i wouldn’t worry. i haven’t seen any reason why this year won’t deliver. if we’re in the same spot in a month with crap on the horizon for 10 days, then it’s time to worry

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The special characteristic of 1973 from my research is the recurring volatility of two long lived patterns during short periods. I'm just saying...you'd have more chances than you think. The variation is so fast and dynamic the monthly indexes are almost irrelevant by month.

You can see a pretty clear 45 day-cycle of cold reaching the east in that pattern. Early January, late February, early April. You can also see a 45-day tendency for super heat in the East as well- late January, early March, late April. AO was overall positive in Jan-Mar 1973...but you know...still pretty damn cold at times.

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-17-46-PM

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-18-04-PM

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-18-29-PM

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-18-49-PM

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-19-09-PM

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-19-27-PM

Screenshot-2023-12-12-8-19-46-PM

Apr 16-30 was also very warm in the East, per the pattern.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...