Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

December 2023


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

There’s maybe a chance in that 13-17 window of the month before it gets hostile again. 

Expectations are set pretty low at this point, but it would be nice to get on the board going into the end of the month.....anything after last year will feel like a blizzard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Wednesday morning for eastern areas could be first measurable for them....worth watching. We're saturated up to about the -12C layer with low level lift and of course we know along the coast, the salty air produces excellent snow growth down into the -8C or even warmer layer. The low levels are cold too so no rain issues....only factor will be if we can get a few hours of steady snow or if it;s just a few scattered snow showers that can't sustain.

Could be a narrow area just west of the CF that does relatively well. But if the NAM is right, might be a lot of flakes in the air at least for those removed from best moisture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

There’s maybe a chance in that 13-17 window of the month before it gets hostile again. 

EPS far more "favorable" (still pretty meh) in that period than GEFS. Kind of funny because about a week ago, the GEFS were more weenie-ish and the EPS was kind of meh for that period....now GEFS is a torch while EPS is still basically showing "meh"....would be nice to sneak something in there.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spanks45 said:

Expectations are set pretty low at this point, but it would be nice to get on the board going into the end of the month.....anything after last year will feel like a blizzard

I was hoping something in place for a change just before Christmas, but I'm not so sure now. But the ensembles are showing signs of shuffling at the end of the runs so we'll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WX-PA said:

I don't think this looks torchy but who knows

 

 

Those are the weeklies and that is the last week of the month, not week 2.

 

Here's what the EPS shows for that Dec 13-17 period. You can see it's not all that bad. +EPO so it's not an arctic airmass type pattern, but enough wetsern ridging to give us chances if it came to fruition...as I said to Scott just a minute ago, GEFS is more hostile

 

 

 

 

 

Dec4_12zEPS306.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Wednesday morning for eastern areas could be first measurable for them....worth watching. We're saturated up to about the -12C layer with low level lift and of course we know along the coast, the salty air produces excellent snow growth down into the -8C or even warmer layer. The low levels are cold too so no rain issues....only factor will be if we can get a few hours of steady snow or if it;s just a few scattered snow showers that can't sustain.

Raycranberrybog.png.2ad3354784346427dd4476d3b9d6b4b7.png

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Could be a narrow area just west of the CF that does relatively well. But if the NAM is right, might be a lot of flakes in the air at least for those removed from best moisture. 

I should have mentioned the immediate coast in places like PYM county might be rain issues because of the CF, but most of the land area is west of the CF, so it would be plenty cold to the west of that for snow.

If we can punch some decent localized lift, the soundings are pretty decent, so someone could see a little surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Wednesday morning for eastern areas could be first measurable for them....worth watching. We're saturated up to about the -12C layer with low level lift and of course we know along the coast, the salty air produces excellent snow growth down into the -8C or even warmer layer. The low levels are cold too so no rain issues....only factor will be if we can get a few hours of steady snow or if it;s just a few scattered snow showers that can't sustain.

 

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Could be a narrow area just west of the CF that does relatively well. But if the NAM is right, might be a lot of flakes in the air at least for those removed from best moisture. 

Nammy has flakes even into eastern CT. Pretty funny to see that Thursday impulse get absolutely shredded as it dives into New England. That’s a more frustrating thing to witness than tracking torches two weeks into the future on models. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

I should have mentioned the immediate coast in places like PYM county might be rain issues because of the CF, but most of the land area is west of the CF, so it would be plenty cold to the west of that for snow.

If we can punch some decent localized lift, the soundings are pretty decent, so someone could see a little surprise.

And some mid level RH too moving in so maybe seeder-feeder to help? 

 

Anyways, not to beat this to death..but nothing much else to talk about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

I should have mentioned the immediate coast in places like PYM county might be rain issues because of the CF, but most of the land area is west of the CF, so it would be plenty cold to the west of that for snow.

If we can punch some decent localized lift, the soundings are pretty decent, so someone could see a little surprise.

Yeah, might be mostly rain here. But places like Carver or Plymouth along and to the west of RT3 might stay snowy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxWatcher007 said:

 

Nammy has flakes even into eastern CT. Pretty funny to see that Thursday impulse get absolutely shredded as it dives into New England. That’s a more frustrating thing to witness than tracking torches two weeks into the future on models. 

Yeah that was the Dec 6th system we were originally hoping had enough room to amplify into a real storm....it's a very good shortwave which is why we still may see some snow despite it not getting the room it needs to amplify downstream ridging. We would've had a good enough airmass in place too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

If you're referring to me, I have super thick skin. Has nothing to do with what I want to hear. I'm a realist. I know we're not in a good pattern right now and that's perfectly fine. And if I wanted to turns out just like last year then it is what it is. Trust me it doesn't run my life. But I'm no dummy. I've been around a long time. There are a few people who are not here to be constructive as I mentioned. Say what you want but I'll stick by what I said as well. Anyway, back to forecasting. I'm done with my rant. 

 

I think many here aren’t that constructive per se ,mostly just post pro snow stuff bc that is what most want to see (especially the amateurs) and why most take time out of their lives to hang on a weather board in winter  .
 

 A few either really Enjoy warmth or like the reactions from people who usually are annoyed by warmista posts but to me the only reason to be banned is being extremely mean and hurtful (personal attacks that aren’t just “foo foo” insults and or just posting non stop with “agree with me or else ideas” that are way over their heads. Trolling is subjective . Omega to me doesn’t get in fights or take the bait when people insult him so that is more why I don’t have a problem , he doesn’t disrupt the board . He may send weenies realing but when you post an idea or map with it I don’t see the issue personally to me that’s on weenie frailty . Maybe im the minority 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah that was the Dec 6th system we were originally hoping had enough room to amplify into a real storm....it's a very good shortwave which is why we still may see some snow despite it not getting the room it needs to amplify downstream ridging. We would've had a good enough airmass in place too.

Yeah, it’s a shame. That’s a real missed opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Those are the weeklies and that is the last week of the month, not week 2.

 

Here's what the EPS shows for that Dec 13-17 period. You can see it's not all that bad. +EPO so it's not an arctic airmass type pattern, but enough wetsern ridging to give us chances if it came to fruition...as I said to Scott just a minute ago, GEFS is more hostile

 

 

 

 

 

Dec4_12zEPS306.png

Would you favor a blend at this time frame or just wait to see it come in focus by late this week 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I think many here aren’t that constructive per se ,mostly just post pro snow stuff bc that is what most want to see (especially the amateurs) and why most take time out of their lives to hang on a weather board in winter  .
 

 A few either really Enjoy warmth or like the reactions from people who usually are annoyed by warmista posts but to me the only reason to be banned is being extremely mean and hurtful (personal attacks that aren’t just “foo foo” insults and or just posting non stop with “agree with me or else ideas” that are way over their heads. Trolling is subjective . Omega to me doesn’t get in fights or take the bait when people insult him so that is more why I don’t have a problem , he doesn’t disrupt the board . He may send weenies realing but when you post an idea or map with it I don’t see the issue personally to me that’s on weenie frailty . Maybe im the minority 

He’s 5-posted so he can’t really get into responding to much. 
 

30 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

Would you favor a blend at this time frame or just wait to see it come in focus by late this week 

Blending is usually the way to go at this time frame…obviously we’ll know more on which one is “more correct” as we get closer. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

pretty favorable trend in the Pacific mid-month... PNA looks much better. might be able to pull off a light event given this pattern

gfs-ens_z500a_namer_fh168_trend.gif.ec8e0ca95dbac3be823c1eadc5a06fbb.gif

18z op went wild with the NAO in weenie range. Probably wrong, but it would be one way to keep things a little more interesting. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...