Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,792
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Richmond Metro/Hampton Roads Area Discussion


RIC Airport
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's great to know, but I would be careful using the ICON and CMC for sniffing out east coast snowstorms. ICON hasn't been around long enough, and CMC has only won once in like the last 15-20 years over the GFS/Euro. I'm not trying to be a killjoy, just saying. I think they might be useful closer in though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ldub23 said:

This year  is done. The  pattern isnt going to change till late  march when we can enjoy well below  normal temps and rain till mid  may. Will se va  get an inch of snow  next winter?

I disagree, snow season goes through the end of March. ORF even had accumulating snows (2.0") as late as 3/12 back in 2018. 

Richmond had a 4" event on 3/24/2013 and a 2.0" on 3/21/2018. Not including at least a handful of events in early March since 2013.

Just because the models propped an unlikely event on 2/5 has no bearing for the rest of the season. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The upcoming pattern looks very favorable starting on Feb 15th.  There hasn’t been any can kicking.  Long wave patterns looks pretty darn good with split flow and developing NAO block. Folks in main thread are going nuts over it today, even the regular skeptics on that thread are bullish. Will see.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 years ago today, a really nice snowstorm was winding down in our region. What was so nice about it was that it was a daytime event accompanied by very cold temperatures and low visibilities. Snow started around 4am, with the heaviest rates (1-2" per hour) between about 8am and 4pm. Temperatures at Richmond were only in the upper teens to around 20°F during the event. It was one of the coldest snowstorms of this magnitude since the Blizzard of 1996. Official accumulations were 10.0" at RIC and 6.5" at ORF, but some places in the RIC area had as much as 14-15". 

A map with the event summary from NWS Wakefield can be found at this link

Below is a 24-hour summary for RIC for 1/30/2010, and a couple of obs and saved radar images from that day. 

1236716139_Screenshot2024-01-31104941.jpg.b0fa28f04bd7a2319bef905211b8ac04.jpg

RIC.thumb.jpg.bdd7cb4d20f2a95d49f4b1065845c15d.jpg

 

ORF.jpg.2542236fdc28eeffcc332f95ddfe2ad0.jpg

 

totalsnow.png.844bda861544d088827d30179b627eef.png

post-120-0-68051000-1290349981.gif.a4d23ae75114b32248c7016816b64d48.gifpost-120-0-61463800-1296381779.gif.a1804ce0a58552848f8a6cd97e8e0fc2.gif

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Conway7305 said:

The upcoming pattern looks very favorable starting on Feb 15th.  There hasn’t been any can kicking.  Long wave patterns looks pretty darn good with split flow and developing NAO block. Folks in main thread are going nuts over it today, even the regular skeptics on that thread are bullish. Will see.  

50 minutes ago, JB Fins said:

Those were the days.

Those were the days, @JB Fins. Wish we could get a cold storm with high ratios like that again soon. Look at that RIC 10:54am ob and that visibility! That was as the best rates were starting to happen. 

Also, @Conway7305, @ldub23 et. al, the GFS still has a storm around 2/15. It's way out there so not worth getting into the details because we know it's going to change. Also, the end of today's 12z run was encouraging for the 2/15 period and beyond. Hopefully it has a clue, it's too early to give up on the winter. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RIC Airport said:

Posting to save @ldub23 time. ;) 

Certainly a good look. But I'm definitely NOT getting reeled in this soon. Need to get to around 10 days before I begin investing time. But the signals are great to see. 

gfs-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-1706702400-1707825600-1708084800-40.thumb.gif.d9a5670341eed44a2b861bb62010c53d.gif

radar.thumb.gif.6a452b2b079c076d47c83975f083bd75.gif

gfs-deterministic-shenendoah-instant_ptype-7976800.thumb.png.26640145b61d7f06e5413e870b277d03.png

gfs-deterministic-shenendoah-total_snow_10to1-8084800.thumb.png.2c2d287a4f3c683dd31fe7b0d00ec515.png

Hopefully the  cold will actually show  up. The  last  so called  pattern change had  2 days  of winter temps and no snow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RIC Airport said:

Those were the days, @JB Fins. Wish we could get a cold storm with high ratios like that again soon. Look at that RIC 10:54am ob and that visibility! That was as the best rates were starting to happen. 

Also, @Conway7305, @ldub23 et. al, the GFS still has a storm around 2/15. It's way out there so not worth getting into the details because we know it's going to change. Also, the end of today's 12z run was encouraging for the 2/15 period and beyond. Hopefully it has a clue, it's too early to give up on the winter. 

2/15-3/15 period is going to be rockin!!

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wasnow215 said:

Perfect split flow. Couldn’t draw it up any better.

Yup, and the higher heights in the NAO/AO domains. But, more importantly, this time around, we have a bona fide western ridge. Both the EPS and GEFS look favorable for a snowstorm, I hope WE can score and the snow isn't displaced north and west of us. It's hard to see why we couldn't. 

ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_anom-7998400.thumb.png.3ee8e6f9de35059cf8805ef8105e13e1.pnggfs-ensemble-all-avg-namer-z500_anom-8084800.thumb.png.f841dfc5c501357d3d55ae384d23a3c3.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, ldub23 said:

Hopefully the  cold will actually show  up. The  last  so called  pattern change had  2 days  of winter temps and no snow.

I agree. But, had the 2/5 threat not shown up on the models, that had been expected. That we'd have a brief cool down, followed by a moderation before things got good for mid-late month into March.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RIC Airport said:

I agree. But, had the 2/5 threat not shown up on the models, that had been expected. That we'd have a brief cool down, followed by a moderation before things got good for mid-late month into March.

Weeklies  showing favorable pattern continuing through March 15th. Looks like we may get a month of opportunities after pattern change occurs on or shortly after Feb 15th.  I feel like our best window is going to be between Feb 18th-28th  but March could also be good. All ingredients are there Split Flow, -AO, -NAO MJO in Phase 8, +PNA, Active STJ in a moderate/strong NINO. It is rare to get all these Oscillations  in right places at the right time. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Conway7305 said:

Weeklies  showing favorable pattern continuing through March 15th. Looks like we may get a month of opportunities after pattern change occurs on or shortly after Feb 15th.  I feel like our best window is going to be between Feb 18th-28th  but March could also be good. All ingredients are there Split Flow, -AO, -NAO MJO in Phase 8, +PNA, Active STJ in a moderate/strong NINO. It is rare to get all these Oscillations  in right places at the right time. 

There have been quite a few decent events mid to late month. I haven't gone through Norfolk's data yet, but here are Richmond's February snowstorms that delivered 4 inches or more since 1898. Quite a few events were close to making the list, so this doesn't exactly tell the whole story. I will post the Norfolk events at some other time and look at March as well.

February Snowstorms 4" or more at Richmond (since 1898)

5.0” February 26, 2015
7.2” February 16-17, 2015
5.8” February 12-13, 2014
4.0” February 19-20, 2012
6.6” February 5-6, 2010
8.3” February 16, 1996
4.0” February 26-27, 1993
5.3” February 23-24, 1989
7.6” February 18, 1989
5.3” February 16-17, 1987
17.7” February 10-11, 1983
6.6” February 27-28, 1982
4.2” February 13-14, 1982
4.7” February 9-10, 1980
10.9” February 18-19, 1979
6.4” February 7, 1979
4.4” February 19, 1972
4.0” February 17, 1972
5.3” February 2, 1972
4.9” February 17-18, 1967
6.4” February 9-10, 1967
5.6” February 6-7, 1967
6.6” February 14-15, 1965
7.3” February 28, 1964
5.3” February 26, 1963
8.9” February 13-14, 1960
6.3” February 15, 1958
5.6” February 26-27, 1952
5.4” February 24, 1952
4.5” February 10, 1948
10.1” January 31-February 1, 1948
9.2” February 19-20, 1947
12.6” February 7, 1936
8.0” February 25, 1934
4.7” February 4-5, 1933
4.6” February 20, 1914
4.7” February 13, 1914
4.1” February 7-8, 1909
4.2” February 27, 1906
6.1” February 10-11, 1904
9.7” February 15-17, 1902
5.4” February 16-18, 1900
16.3” February 11-14, 1899
4.0” February 6-7, 1899

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I said I lost interest, but the 2/5 to 2/6 threat is not dead in the water. There are still several ensemble members that have us getting snow next week. Also, the 18z GFS was farther north with enough cold air, so it was something to monitor. We've seen some weird last-minute hits before. 

gfs-ensemble-all-avg-ma-precip_6hr_ptype_multimember_panel-1706724000-1707091200-1707285600-100.thumb.gif.6c4a051ec3a386736d48e285c2563b63.gif

SNOW.thumb.png.21e6c3ceebc5fb13459fb9031a90ca80.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RIC Airport said:

I know I said I lost interest, but the 2/5 to 2/6 threat is not dead in the water. There are still several ensemble members that have us getting snow next week. Also, the 18z GFS was farther north with enough cold air, so it was something to monitor. We've seen some weird last-minute hits before. 

gfs-ensemble-all-avg-ma-precip_6hr_ptype_multimember_panel-1706724000-1707091200-1707285600-100.thumb.gif.6c4a051ec3a386736d48e285c2563b63.gif

SNOW.thumb.png.21e6c3ceebc5fb13459fb9031a90ca80.png

P4 please!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ldub23 said:

No arctic air anywhere. Very  mild with no sign of  any below  normal temps

Doesn't look THAT bad to me. And this is at 1pm.

But, again.....it's hour 384. ;)The 00z run could have us at 25°F or a full fledged torch 70°F+. So, while no arctic cold, you can't really glean much from that range.

gfs-deterministic-east-t2m_f-8106400.thumb.png.8841d511bbaffd9496c2e3b6b8cc814c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RIC Airport said:

The 18z GEFS still has a few hits around the 5-6th. However, there were more hits for ORF and ECG. After that, there is an uptick toward mid-month. 

18Z GEFS 1-31.png

RIC.thumb.png.8c31fc66fe5b414cd4eb9d55c3f9e70f.pngORF.thumb.png.9b5d08caa2814870cf7d7b0769702520.pngECG.thumb.png.da17535354d55e56df8de095c0a94ec8.png

I  personally think next week is the  only chance  for  accumulating in se va this winter. Still a  chance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 00z EPS showed the next bona fide threat window toward mid-month, primarily for Richmond. 1-2 members DO show the snow shower possibility next week on the back side of that coastal storm.

Hopefully, these charts will light up like a Christmas tree in the coming days  as the pattern continues to look favorable for snowstorms. 

RIC.thumb.png.9437c7baef360daa70c23fd55bd8d0e8.pngORF.thumb.png.7548068486a09cd714413d2e63427589.pngECG.thumb.png.5a61596da2751941548a0f2ca96e1724.png

14th.thumb.png.87125ef4ef5f5ae3af12abb5d0827c46.png14th5.thumb.png.c09ed7f95260b5d5d79ecc16ea70b5f9.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...