Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

November Mid/Long Range Discussion


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

That was absolutely terrible. We had this wonderful cold blast that lasted a whole 72 hours. Then total muck the rest of the winter. 

i think that's where the negativity around this pattern comes from. lots of deja vu especially bc the pattern looks really good around this time last year

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CAPE said:

The oddity is the trajectory of the low track . It's essentially an Albert Clipper. Not so common in early Dec. EJ is correct though. 50-50 low. HP to the west over the GLs- results in a nice feed of cold from the north into the storm. -NAO forces the low to track to our south.

1701820800-3xgzPfg4bLU.png

This. Not sure how much faith I’d put in an OV low transfer to the Carolina coast. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AtlanticWx said:

i think that's where the negativity around this pattern comes from. lots of deja vu especially bc the pattern looks really good around this time last year

Last year might have been too much of a good thing. I remember that mega NAO block. The -SD that kept appearing on the ens means didn't have 'reds in the right spots'  ....we had magenta blob all across the NAO region. Most of the forum thought we couldn't fail with those looks up top. All that yielded was an avocado +SD PV forced under that block which overwhelmed the pattern. The -PNA didn't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, brooklynwx99 said:

so people like myself, @griteater, @40/70 Benchmark, and others who had 2009 as a strong analog would have been called weenies by him, but now it’s his top analog? such bullshit

IMG_3561.thumb.png.a69f45d3a44ad5e6131977775eb0d4e9.png

His original take is there but we don’t want people being JB type irrational stubborn in the face of changing information either. Better late than never. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

His original take is there but we don’t want people being JB type irrational stubborn in the face of changing information either. Better late than never. 

You buy what the guidance is starting to spit out in the extended? You think we cash in with some early season snow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

You buy what the guidance is starting to spit out in the extended? You think we cash in with some early season snow?

It fits the pattern progression in the analogs from my winter forecast so why wouldn’t I. Doesn’t guarantee anything yet but things are going according to plan so far. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

Any met comment on DT's thoughts on the -NAO in early Dec?  ( that is not really a -NAO?)

 

He's mentioned this before but he usually references the transient NATL thumb, this is definitely not the transient thumb where you briefly for 2-3 days get positive heights over Greenland.  Its really the only reason we do not go full blown epic torch 12/1-12/3 with that western pattern.  Without that Greenland ridging we'd have a massive SER with highs in the 60s probably on those 3 days

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SnowGoose69 said:

 

He's mentioned this before but he usually references the transient NATL thumb, this is definitely not the transient thumb where you briefly for 2-3 days get positive heights over Greenland.  Its really the only reason we do not go full blown epic torch 12/1-12/3 with that western pattern.  Without that Greenland ridging we'd have a massive SER with highs in the 60s probably on those 3 days

He couldn't be wrong. How dare you question dt the great. The self professed best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Terpeast said:

I skimmed through. I think he’s splitting hairs. Would have to read it again with fresh eyes though 

Exactly what he is doing. Even by the numbers its a -NAO. Maybe he is arguing that the mechanism by which it forms won't result in a sustained blocking event. I could buy that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As advertised this is a textbook -NAO. Higher than normal pressure near Iceland(weak sub-polar low), lower than normal pressure near the Azores(weaker subtropical high). Amplified longwave pattern with anomalous trough-ridge-trough across the N Atlantic. If that longwave pattern locks in for an extended period, then it is considered an atmospheric block.

1701453600-XLu7b086AfA.png

1701453600-SVwoefgom14.png

1700870400-dNcQZqjj610grb2.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Exactly what he is doing. Even by the numbers its a -NAO. Maybe he is arguing that the mechanism by which it forms won't result in a sustained blocking event. I could buy that.

I agree.  As currently depicted, it's a "real" -NAO.  I think he's splitting hairs that it's not forming through the one way of a Scandinavian ridge that retrogrades into the NAO domain.  But Rossby wave breaking is also a very "real" way for a -NAO to form, and that's what's happening here.  One thing I'm watching for is the orientation of the ridge.  I want to see it develop that E-W orientation that's being advertised, and not just N-S.  An E-W ridge over Greenland and Baffin is FAR more effective than a poleward oriented ridge over Greenland or Iceland.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...