tunafish Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Speaking of MWN tragedies, this one was a near miss: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4GKSYQLdEj/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=15dc5c1c-a95f-4ef5-99aa-ee8b012c8e38&ig_mid=F0939EF6-70E6-4AED-94C5-581C513A2EBD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 VERMONT ...Addison County... 4 ENE Starksboro 3.0 900 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 WNW Orwell 1.8 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 SSE Cornwall 1.2 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer N Middlebury 0.3 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Bennington County... Landgrove 11.8 820 AM 3/10 WeatherNet6 ...Caledonia County... N Danville 8.0 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 NW Peacham 7.9 730 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 3 NNE Danville 7.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 S Wheelock 7.4 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 SW Sutton 7.1 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer Groton 6.0 643 AM 3/10 Public Danville 6.0 1027 AM 3/10 Public 4 W Barnet 5.0 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 WNW Wells River 4.2 716 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 N North Kirby 3.0 820 AM 3/10 Public ...Chittenden County... 4 ESE Underhill 4.0 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 E Huntington 2.6 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 E Nashville 2.3 645 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer Shelburne 2.0 1103 AM 3/10 Public WSW Williston 1.7 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 4 NNE Underhill 1.6 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 3 SSW Williston 1.6 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 5 NNE Underhill 1.5 650 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 NNW Williston 1.0 746 AM 3/10 NWS Employee 1 ENE Shelburne 1.0 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 3 SSW South Burlingt 1.0 805 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 NE South Burlingto 0.8 753 AM 3/10 NWS Office 2 SW Milton 0.8 753 AM 3/10 NWS Employee 1 N Hinesburg 0.7 804 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 NNE Hinesburg 0.7 826 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter ...Essex County... 1 S East Haven 4.5 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer Island Pond 4.0 1036 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 2 NNW Lunenburg 1.2 530 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Franklin County... St. Albans 1.3 706 AM 3/10 Public 3 SW Swanton 1.3 806 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 3 N Enosburg Falls 1.2 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 NNE Swanton 0.7 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Lamoille County... 1 SSE Smugglers Notc 8.5 817 AM 3/10 Public 2 SSW Eden 7.0 746 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter 2 N Johnson 7.0 730 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer Wolcott 5.8 925 AM 3/10 Public 3 N Smugglers Notch 5.6 730 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 1 NW Stowe 4.0 816 AM 3/10 Public Morrisville 4.0 737 AM 3/10 Public SW Stowe 3.5 730 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 SSW Jeffersonville 2.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Orange County... 3 SW Braintree 12.5 730 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Williamstown 12.0 959 AM 3/10 Public Brookfield 10.0 1007 AM 3/10 Public Randolph Center 9.0 926 AM 3/10 Public 2 E Corinth Corners 8.1 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 2 SE Strafford 6.1 630 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Chelsea 6.0 831 AM 3/10 Public West Newbury 4.8 825 AM 3/10 Public 2 NNW Bradford 3.0 900 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 ENE West Fairlee 2.9 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Orleans County... 1 NE East Craftsbury 7.0 905 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Albany 6.5 916 AM 3/10 Public 7 SE Morgan 6.0 900 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Craftsbury Common 4.4 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 4 NNE Greensboro 4.3 720 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 NNW Greensboro 3.8 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 WNW Westfield 3.0 715 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 W Derby Line 1.1 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Rutland County... 1 W Shrewsbury 8.2 730 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 N Rutland 1.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 N West Rutland 1.0 615 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 3 SSW Wallingford 0.9 730 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 2 SSE Pittsford 0.5 757 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Washington County... 3 E Warren 12.0 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 SSE Walden 12.0 1030 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter 4 ESE Marshfield 11.0 913 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter Northfield 10.0 818 AM 3/10 Public 4 ENE Cabot 9.8 830 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 SW East Barre 9.5 828 AM 3/10 NWS Employee 2 W Worcester 9.2 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer Graniteville 8.0 619 AM 3/10 Public Waterbury Center 8.0 926 AM 3/10 Public 2 N Moretown 7.5 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Cabot 7.3 657 AM 3/10 Public 1 NNW Woodbury 6.9 915 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 3 NNW Woodbury 6.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 N Cabot 6.5 928 AM 3/10 Public 2 NNE Waterbury Cent 6.0 530 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter Duxbury 5.5 649 AM 3/10 Public 1 NW Calais 5.0 831 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter 2 SW East Calais 5.0 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 4 NE Waterbury 4.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS East Calais 4.2 1151 AM 3/10 Public 2 NW Waterbury Cente 4.0 750 AM 3/10 Public 1 ESE Plainfield 3.8 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 3 NW Waterbury 2.3 600 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS ...Windham County... East Dummerston 1.5 700 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter Brattleboro 0.5 846 AM 3/10 Twitter ...Windsor County... 2 NE Rochester 14.0 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Rochester 11.5 639 AM 3/10 Public 3 S Ludlow 11.3 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS NNE Proctorsville 9.0 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 4 W Hartland 8.5 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 SE West Norwich 8.5 915 AM 3/10 Public NE Rochester 7.0 715 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Bethel 6.5 819 AM 3/10 Public 3 NE West Hartford 5.6 751 AM 3/10 Public Bridgewater Corners 4.5 1000 AM 3/10 Amateur Radio 1 E Woodstock 3.6 800 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Spin Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 This storm cycle is ongoing, but below is the current north to south listing of storm totals from the Vermont ski areas. Some totals are from early morning, and some are midday updates, so there’s going to be some extra heterogeneity at this point. Jay Peak: 24” Burke: 19” Smuggler’s Notch: 15” Stowe: 15” Bolton Valley: 20” Mad River Glen: 29” Sugarbush: 19” Middlebury: 13” Pico: 27” Killington: 27” Okemo: 16” Bromley: 14” Magic Mountain: 15” Stratton: 15” Mount Snow: 9” 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 21” for Stowe at 4pm. Documented and measured. 8” yesterday morning. 1” yesterday 4pm. 9” this morning. 3” at 4pm today (rounded up to make up for a couple rounded down earlier). 8 + 1 + 9 + 3 = 21”. Due diligence in accurate totals, ha. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt3650 Posted March 11 Author Share Posted March 11 21” for Stowe at 4pm. Documented and measured. 8” yesterday morning. 1” yesterday 4pm. 9” this morning. 3” at 4pm today (rounded up to make up for a couple rounded down earlier). 8 + 1 + 9 + 3 = 21”. Due diligence in accurate totals, ha.Makes my “about 20” look like a second grader did it. We’re probably way over that now, but it’s tough to measure with the wind. I really want to see if I can put a stake in the woods behind my house this summer to get accurate measurements next winter.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angus Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 watching the webcam at MRG today. It has been pounding snow all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 5 hours ago, bwt3650 said: Makes my “about 20” look like a second grader did it. We’re probably way over that now, but it’s tough to measure with the wind. I really want to see if I can put a stake in the woods behind my house this summer to get accurate measurements next winter. . Really need a protected spot. This one was found by a patroller like 30 years ago. You go in there and it’s like, this is where we need to measure, ha. This is what 21” looks like… the depth in the woods just came up a full, even 20. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Mansfield stake recovered 24” of depth in this cycle. 41” to 65”. This is about 800ft higher than our High Rd observations. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 2 hours ago, powderfreak said: Really need a protected spot. This one was found by a patroller like 30 years ago. You go in there and it’s like, this is where we need to measure, ha. This is what 21” looks like… the depth I the woods just came up a full, even 20. Epic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt3650 Posted March 11 Author Share Posted March 11 EpicDid someone say take ‘em up? Nice call.. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmcginvt Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I gave up on proper measurement this year because fuck it. Im inconsistent. But we got a ton of snow at 820' and then lost a ton of snow on Sun and then gained a lot back. Right now the only important thing to me is there's a foot in my yard. Yet a lot more fell but it's winter again and i like it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmcginvt Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 5 hours ago, J.Spin said: This storm cycle is ongoing, but below is the current north to south listing of storm totals from the Vermont ski areas. Some totals are from early morning, and some are midday updates, so there’s going to be some extra heterogeneity at this point. Jay Peak: 24” Burke: 19” Smuggler’s Notch: 15” Stowe: 15” Bolton Valley: 20” Mad River Glen: 29” Sugarbush: 19” Middlebury: 13” Pico: 27” Killington: 27” Okemo: 16” Bromley: 14” Magic Mountain: 15” Stratton: 15” Mount Snow: 9” Curious about the MRG vs Bush. Bush may only be going by their cam sites? It was tough with all the wind. Look at that 24 stowe cam. The board gains nothing while the blown in piles up behind it I loved see that. Almost looked like it wanted to buried the thermo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sankaty Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Pico was phenomenal today. Boot-deep fluffy powder all day with falling and windblown snow constantly filling in the tracks. The soft, dense snow underneath it all from yesterday made it seem bottomless. Maybe the second best snow conditions I can remember in VT. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Spin Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 4 hours ago, powderfreak said: 21” for Stowe at 4pm. Documented and measured. 8” yesterday morning. 1” yesterday 4pm. 9” this morning. 3” at 4pm today (rounded up to make up for a couple rounded down earlier). 8 + 1 + 9 + 3 = 21”. Due diligence in accurate totals, ha. Thanks for the full summation and storm total PF, well done. I’ve updated the north to south list of reported storm totals for the Vermont ski areas as of this evening. Some resorts made end-of-day updates, but some are still just morning totals. Jay Peak: 24” Burke: 19” Smuggler’s Notch: 21” Stowe: 21” Bolton Valley: 24” Mad River Glen: 29” Sugarbush: 23” Middlebury: 21” Pico: 27” Killington: 27” Okemo: 16” Bromley: 14” Magic Mountain: 15” Stratton: 15” Mount Snow: 9” 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, bwt3650 said: Did someone say take ‘em up? Nice call. . Zero chance? Lol thanks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 22 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Zero chance? Lol thanks He was talking about the village though. I’m not sure where they ended up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmcginvt Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 20 minutes ago, mreaves said: He was talking about the village though. I’m not sure where they ended up. I was in the village today, looked like 6 inches, but that's depth. What fell we may never know. But over 9in fell during this storm with anyone measuring with a board in the village and there's no question about that. I have a foot otg and at least 20 fell. I think ginx won. proximity to the mtn was def a factor, but it's full on winter in Stowe again even in the village I had to go to work today at 782 mtn rd. That .782 miles down the rd. There was def 6 inches otg at 3 pm. After the snow that fell, and then melted and almost disappeared, plus the snow on top of that there's simply now question it was more than 9" . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmcginvt Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=799424885552128&set=a.220831436744812&type=3&ref=embed_page This map shows it, it might say 8 for me too, but I got way more than that. Especially since I have a foot on the ground and can prove it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, dmcginvt said: Curious about the MRG vs Bush. Bush may only be going by their cam sites? It was tough with all the wind. Look at that 24 stowe cam. The board gains nothing while the blown in piles up behind it I loved see that. Almost looked like it wanted to buried the thermo That’s likely exactly what it is. The elevated snowboards are great at times but in windy events they will get wrecked. The same reason why your car’s roof can only have a few inches on it when there’s boot deep snow on the ground all around. I give the Bush props for sticking with it though. They are trying to do it in as controlled a manner as possible. The ground based floating board is the way to go though, just shows the new snow/pack increase from the last time it was checked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Spin Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 With the storm cycle transitioning into its back half overnight, the upslope really turned on in the Northern Greens. Bolton Valley was reporting 20 inches for the storm total in their early morning update, so I headed up for some turns with my younger son and his roommate. There was solid 1”/hr. snow falling in the valley and up at the resort, so I was worried about vehicles struggling to get up the Access Road like my older son and I experienced a couple weeks back, but the road was in nice shape and we made it up to the Timberline Base easily. The upslope winds were roaring all throughout the resort, and the Vista Quad was not likely to get off wind hold at all during the day, so we spent our entire session down at Timberline. Relatively speaking, the lower elevations of Timberline meant that the winds were at least somewhat lower, and the temperatures a bit warmer. And, temperatures were cold enough everywhere so that even the lower elevations were still pulling in cold smoke powder, so Timberline was definitely the place to be. Even calling the weather “cold” is relative though – we’re talking “March cold”, which is nothing like “January cold”. Temperatures were well up into the 20s F and quite pleasant. There were no lift queues for most of the morning, so it was simply hop on and run laps until we approached late morning when more people started to arrive and others realized that Timberline was the place to be. We did overhear conversations from people who were arriving from other resorts like Stowe that were having wind hold issues as well. As expected with the beautiful right-side-up nature of this storm cycle, the powder skiing, and even the packed, on piste skiing, were excellent. We picked up 2.34 inches of liquid equivalent from the storm down in the valley at our site, so the mountains must have seen close to 3 inches of liquid from the event. When you get to those levels of fresh liquid equivalent on top of the snowpack, you’re looking at an unmitigated resurfacing of the slopes. And aside from the occasional scoured areas, a thorough resurfacing is just what we found. During our session, my depth measurements at around 2,500’ were indicating roughly 24 inches of accumulation, and I see that’s what the resort is indicating for their storm total as of their midday update, so that seems very much in sync with what I found. For our session, we made use of the solid resurfacing dump and jumped into just about all of our steepest favorites. There were really only a couple of very steep spots that we skipped (craggy cliff bands and super steep lines in very dense evergreens) that I knew wouldn’t quite be there since the snowpack below 2,000’ was a little too lean coming into this system. All in all though, it’s been an excellent storm cycle thus far, and the boys clearly picked a good week for their spring break. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 hours ago, Ginx snewx said: Zero chance? Lol thanks Hey I’ll give you credit and NWS. I’m not stubborn or trying to prove anything, was just my gut feeling given the elevation, but 8” is on the ground here at the end and it looks like winter. The storm total got me. Saw the 9-10” on NWS map and thought it was aggressive for the village. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Spin Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 On 3/10/2024 at 9:36 PM, wxeyeNH said: RIP to the 20 year old kid who fell 600 feet in Tuckerman's this weekend. 2 others were rescued. This is the 21rst death on the mountain since the year 2000. On 3/10/2024 at 10:54 PM, powderfreak said: Sad stuff. The price of admission can be very high. You need to know what you are getting into. 600 vertical feet is a terrifying fall. This isn’t making light of it, but the temperature is a full degree or two different from the starting and stopping points. Thats a long fall. I just saw tha she was a UVM student. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jebman Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 6 hours ago, J.Spin said: With the storm cycle transitioning into its back half overnight, the upslope really turned on in the Northern Greens. Bolton Valley was reporting 20 inches for the storm total in their early morning update, so I headed up for some turns with my younger son and his roommate. There was solid 1”/hr. snow falling in the valley and up at the resort, so I was worried about vehicles struggling to get up the Access Road like my older son and I experienced a couple weeks back, but the road was in nice shape and we made it up to the Timberline Base easily. The upslope winds were roaring all throughout the resort, and the Vista Quad was not likely to get off wind hold at all during the day, so we spent our entire session down at Timberline. Relatively speaking, the lower elevations of Timberline meant that the winds were at least somewhat lower, and the temperatures a bit warmer. And, temperatures were cold enough everywhere so that even the lower elevations were still pulling in cold smoke powder, so Timberline was definitely the place to be. Even calling the weather “cold” is relative though – we’re talking “March cold”, which is nothing like “January cold”. Temperatures were well up into the 20s F and quite pleasant. There were no lift queues for most of the morning, so it was simply hop on and run laps until we approached late morning when more people started to arrive and others realized that Timberline was the place to be. We did overhear conversations from people who were arriving from other resorts like Stowe that were having wind hold issues as well. As expected with the beautiful right-side-up nature of this storm cycle, the powder skiing, and even the packed, on piste skiing, were excellent. We picked up 2.34 inches of liquid equivalent from the storm down in the valley at our site, so the mountains must have seen close to 3 inches of liquid from the event. When you get to those levels of fresh liquid equivalent on top of the snowpack, you’re looking at an unmitigated resurfacing of the slopes. And aside from the occasional scoured areas, a thorough resurfacing is just what we found. During our session, my depth measurements at around 2,500’ were indicating roughly 24 inches of accumulation, and I see that’s what the resort is indicating for their storm total as of their midday update, so that seems very much in sync with what I found. For our session, we made use of the solid resurfacing dump and jumped into just about all of our steepest favorites. There were really only a couple of very steep spots that we skipped (craggy cliff bands and super steep lines in very dense evergreens) that I knew wouldn’t quite be there since the snowpack below 2,000’ was a little too lean coming into this system. All in all though, it’s been an excellent storm cycle thus far, and the boys clearly picked a good week for their spring break. Absolutely EPIC. Glad you guys got some decent resurfacing snow. I wish it had been four feet. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Final totals for VT VERMONT ...Addison County... S Hancock 10.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 4 ENE Starksboro 9.5 900 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 SE New Haven 5.8 800 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 SE Cornwall 5.4 700 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer N Middlebury 2.8 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 4 NNE Shoreham 2.5 800 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Vergennes 1.8 509 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer ...Bennington County... Landgrove 15.0 1256 PM 3/11 WeatherNet6 1 NNE Landgrove 13.8 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Peru 11.4 700 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 3 ENE Manchester 8.7 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 5 NNE Stamford 6.2 400 PM 3/10 CoCoRaHS W South Shaftsbury 3.0 731 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Caledonia County... 2 SW Sutton 11.3 700 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 4 WSW Groton 10.0 900 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS N Danville 9.0 745 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 3 NNE Danville 8.5 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 4 W Barnet 5.5 750 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 WNW Wells River 4.7 718 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Chittenden County... 4 ESE Underhill 11.5 800 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 E Huntington 8.4 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 E Nashville 7.8 645 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 4 NNE Underhill 6.7 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 S Essex Center 6.6 907 AM 3/11 NWS Employee 5 NNE Underhill 6.5 720 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 3 SSW Williston 4.3 600 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 NNE Hinesburg 3.7 804 AM 3/11 Trained Spotter 1 N Colchester 3.5 637 AM 3/11 NWS Employee 2 SW Milton 3.3 700 AM 3/11 NWS Employee 1 N Hinesburg 3.1 711 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Shelburne 3.0 1103 AM 3/11 Public 3 SSW South Burlingt 2.5 845 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 NE South Burlingto 1.9 803 AM 3/11 NWS Office N Winooski 1.8 757 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 ENE Shelburne 1.3 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Essex County... Averill 10.0 700 PM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 4 WNW Maidstone 6.3 918 AM 3/11 Public Island Pond 5.0 845 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 2 NNW Lunenburg 2.2 530 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Franklin County... 4 ESE Montgomery 10.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Fletcher 7.0 831 AM 3/11 Public 3 N Enosburg Falls 6.7 715 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS St. Albans 4.5 826 AM 3/11 Public 5 WNW Fairfax 3.7 805 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 3 SW Swanton 1.4 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 NNE Swanton 1.2 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Lamoille County... 2 SSW Eden 13.0 1011 AM 3/11 Trained Spotter 3 N Smugglers Notch 12.4 730 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 2 N Johnson 12.0 715 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 1 NW Stowe 8.0 1144 AM 3/11 Public 1 SSW Jeffersonville 7.5 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Cambridge 6.8 927 AM 3/11 Public SW Stowe 6.8 730 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Orange County... 3 SW Braintree 13.1 645 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Williamstown 12.0 959 AM 3/10 Public Brookfield 10.0 1007 AM 3/10 Public 2 E Corinth Corners 9.3 700 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer Randolph Center 9.0 926 AM 3/10 Public East Randolph 9.0 800 AM 3/10 Public 2 SE Strafford 6.1 630 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Chelsea 6.0 831 AM 3/10 Public ESE Chelsea 5.0 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS West Newbury 4.8 825 AM 3/10 Public 2 NNW Bradford 3.2 600 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Orleans County... Westfield 10.0 915 AM 3/11 Public 7 SE Morgan 8.5 730 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 4 NNE Greensboro 7.8 730 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 WNW Westfield 7.0 720 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 NNW Greensboro 6.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 W Derby Line 3.2 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Rutland County... 1 W Shrewsbury 10.0 645 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Brandon 6.8 807 AM 3/11 Public 1 N Rutland 5.5 1223 PM 3/11 Public West Pawlet 5.0 808 AM 3/11 Public 3 SSW Wallingford 2.2 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 N West Rutland 1.9 615 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 SSE Pittsford 1.5 530 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS ...Washington County... 3 SSE Warren 18.0 900 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 3 E Warren 13.5 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 4 ENE Cabot 13.3 900 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 SW East Barre 12.7 1241 PM 3/11 NWS Employee 3 NNW Woodbury 12.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 E Cabot 12.0 830 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 SSE Walden 12.0 1030 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter 4 ESE Marshfield 11.0 913 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter 2 W Worcester 10.7 700 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 3 NW Waterbury 10.5 600 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Northfield 10.0 818 AM 3/10 Public 2 N Moretown 9.5 800 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 NNE Waterbury Cent 9.0 600 AM 3/11 Trained Spotter 1 NNW Woodbury 8.9 800 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Graniteville 8.0 619 AM 3/10 Public Waterbury Center 8.0 926 AM 3/10 Public Cabot 7.3 657 AM 3/10 Public 2 SW East Calais 7.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 N Northfield 6.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 1 ESE Plainfield 4.2 700 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer ...Windham County... 1 WNW Wilmington 8.0 552 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 N East Dover 7.0 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 6 W West Brattleboro 4.5 900 AM 3/10 Co-Op Observer 6 NW Westminster 4.5 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 2 NNE Marlboro 4.5 900 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Townshend 3.0 200 PM 3/10 Trained Spotter 1 NE Putney 2.7 1000 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 NNE Rockingham 2.4 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 6 SSW Guilford 2.2 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 NE East Dummerston 1.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS East Dummerston 1.5 700 AM 3/10 Trained Spotter 1 S Brattleboro 0.8 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS Brattleboro 0.5 846 AM 3/10 Twitter ...Windsor County... 2 NE Rochester 15.8 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS 3 S Ludlow 12.4 800 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS Rochester 11.5 639 AM 3/10 Public NNE Proctorsville 9.0 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 4 W Hartland 8.5 800 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 SE West Norwich 8.5 915 AM 3/10 Public NE Rochester 8.0 700 AM 3/11 CoCoRaHS South Royalton 7.0 800 AM 3/10 Public Bethel 6.5 819 AM 3/10 Public 3 NE West Hartford 5.6 751 AM 3/10 Public Bridgewater Corners 4.5 1000 AM 3/10 Amateur Radio 1 E Woodstock 3.7 800 AM 3/11 Co-Op Observer 2 S West Windsor 3.5 700 AM 3/10 CoCoRaHS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Looks like longitude (and elevation) was far more important than latitude for this event. Aroostook had little more than flurries. The only Maine site I saw that had more than 4-5" was Andover, though I've not seen the ski area totals - SR/SBk/SL probably had 10+. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt3650 Posted March 12 Author Share Posted March 12 Who can help me with a little model education? Why would the cmc be painting rain in northern vt. with the 534 south of Rutland? I get too far away to believe anything, but some trends have been painting a snowier weekend.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 14 hours ago, powderfreak said: Hey I’ll give you credit and NWS. I’m not stubborn or trying to prove anything, was just my gut feeling given the elevation, but 8” is on the ground here at the end and it looks like winter. The storm total got me. Saw the 9-10” on NWS map and thought it was aggressive for the village. Just busting. Deep deep powdah freak. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 15 hours ago, mreaves said: He was talking about the village though. I’m not sure where they ended up. No shit 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 15 hours ago, dmcginvt said: I was in the village today, looked like 6 inches, but that's depth. What fell we may never know. But over 9in fell during this storm with anyone measuring with a board in the village and there's no question about that. I have a foot otg and at least 20 fell. I think ginx won. proximity to the mtn was def a factor, but it's full on winter in Stowe again even in the village I had to go to work today at 782 mtn rd. That .782 miles down the rd. There was def 6 inches otg at 3 pm. After the snow that fell, and then melted and almost disappeared, plus the snow on top of that there's simply now question it was more than 9" . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now