Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

September 2023


Stormlover74
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, nycwinter said:

in the old days it was the actual temps that determined how hot it was  now people today are combining the heat and humidity to make it seem the actual temps are much higher ....traditional values are slipping away..

Sensationalist BS. You would have thought the hurricane last week was an Andrew redux headed for downtown Tampa.

Everything has to be greater than it is, when what it is is great enough in terms of historic weather. Oh well.

100 today!! Except it hasnt hit 100 in a very long time because we are too humid to hit 100 now (thats the historic part but not as sexy)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was thinking a topic for widespread 2-5" rainfall with isolated 10" would be some of value for the period 00z/8-00z/15 but held off due to FFG, ensemble river stage forecasts being conservative.  Still,  I think by the time next Thursday night comes around, isolated life threatening flooding-infrastruture damage will have occurred in the NYC subforum due to repeated 1-4 hour R+ events.  Enough spacing between events permits the recovery needed to probably forego widespread flood damage problems but needs monitoring. This pattern between tonight -Monday, and then reenergized by northward moving Lee interactions with the UL jet Ohio Valley to Bay of Fundy next Wed-Thu is going to result in some significant problems. Where/when is more of a question for me.

Fairly certain damaging wet microburst severe embedded-so monitoring SPC/local office statements is worthy.

On Lee:  if it crosses 70W as it comes around the western Atlantic ridge ahead of the uncertain amplitude of the approaching 5H trough middle of next week, then a New England scraper would be possible.   Lots of uncertainty on the shape of the approaching trough middle of next week. 

Added WPC 7 day contoured forecast issued early this Thursday morning 9/7/23

Screen Shot 2023-09-07 at 6.37.34 AM.png

  • Like 10
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nycwinter said:

in the old days it was the actual temps that determined how hot it was  now people today are combining the heat and humidity to make it seem the actual temps are much higher ....traditional values are slipping away..

Consistent extreme dew points and heat indices didn’t really become more frequent around until July 1995.

 

https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/plotting/auto/?_wait=no&q=76&network=NY_ASOS&station=ISP&season=summer&varname=dwpf&agg=mean&year=1893&w=bar&hours=0-23&_r=t&dpi=100&_fmt=png

AAB4A541-2426-4154-8F08-4C432D629CDA.thumb.png.f7a56bb216526624f952a1f184188a9f.png

FDDA25C1-91A4-4EE6-A512-68CE6783F30F.thumb.png.b2c0e7f27772493ef09262358d94001d.png

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluewave said:

Those point forecasts can be off by 10-20 miles in determining where the max sets up around Philly. So the upper 90s maxes around Philly have been spot on in the city center. Same goes for NJ. The coarse model resolution often shows the max temperatures 20-30 miles SW of Newark and Harrison. But the maxes are usually further NE. So I take the Euro NJ state temperature max and adjust it closer to the urban corridor around Newark. 

Per Rainshadow (retired NWS met) “generally speaking center city should be hotter than the airport but the verification point is the airport. The USCG site in center Philly reached 95 yesterday. The Franklin institute has their instrument shelter on the roof. That is the wrong exposure. The wegmans parking lot is hotter if the instrument was on a grassy median. The euro is broad brushing upper 90’s up and down 95 when in reality that isn’t the case” 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

Per Rainshadow (retired NWS met) “generally speaking center city should be hotter than the airport but the verification point is the airport. The USCG site in center Philly reached 95 yesterday. The Franklin institute has their instrument shelter on the roof. That is the wrong exposure. The wegmans parking lot is hotter just like the tarmac at ewr. Does that mean nyc is to cold? The euro is broad brushing upper 90’s up and down 95 when in reality that isn’t the case” 

You are mixing several things together. First,Tony is correct that the city center is warmer than the airports. Philly is in a swamp next to the Delaware River. So it’s not the greatest representation of the actual temperatures in Philly. I am not a fan of rooftop sites, but it’s not necessarily that they are biased warm vs ground level. Just look at the warmest temperatures in the NYC micronet. The street level sites are often the same or even warmer than rooftop. Plus the higher the rooftop site, the cooler the temperatures. So high enough can be introducing a cool bias. Newark is not significantly warmer than say Harrison or Freehold. NYC is definitely too cold since it’s the only US observing site under a dense tree canopy which biases the highs 2-5 degrees too cool. This wasn’t the case when the site received direct exposure before the 1990s. This was when NYC was typically warmer than LGA as mentioned but the NWS at the time. Ever wonder why the heatwaves before the 1990s had Central Park near the leader for high summer temperatures? Go measure the highs out on the Great Lawn and you would see this cool bias of the trees disappear. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bluewave said:

You are mixing several things together. First,Tony is correct that the city center is warmer than the airports. Philly is in a swamp next to the Delaware River. So it’s not the greatest representation of the actual temperatures in Philly. I am not a fan of rooftop sites, but it’s not necessarily that they are biased warm vs ground level. Just look at the warmest temperatures in the NYC micronet. The street level sites are often the same or even warmer than rooftop. Plus the higher the rooftop site, the cooler the temperatures. So high enough can be introducing a cool bias. Newark is not significantly warmer than say Harrison or Freehold. NYC is definitely too cold since it’s the only US observing site under a dense tree canopy which biases the highs 2-5 degrees too cool. This wasn’t the case when the site received direct exposure before the 1990s. This was when NYC was typically warmer than LGA as mentioned but the NWS at the time. Ever wonder why the heatwaves before the 1990s had Central Park near the leader for high summer temperatures? Go measure the highs out on the Great Lawn and you would see this cool bias of the trees disappear. 

Great post. Thanks 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

Great post. Thanks 

You can see from this old NYT article how Central Park used to be warmer than LGA when the instruments weren’t under the trees. The ASOS at LGA is right on the water away from the main terminals and taxiways. So they can easily get wind flow off that western portion off the Sound-East River. 

https://www.nytimes.com/1977/07/22/archives/vandals-in-central-park-forcing-weather-service-to-seek-new-site.html

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bluewave said:

You can see from this old NYT article how Central Park used to be warmer than LGA when the instruments weren’t under the trees. The ASOS at LGA is right on the water away from the main terminals and taxiways. So they can easily get wind flow off that western portion off the Sound-East River. 

https://www.nytimes.com/1977/07/22/archives/vandals-in-central-park-forcing-weather-service-to-seek-new-site.html

Yea, that has kept LGA relatively cool this week. Constant flow off the sound. You can even see some of the wind obs showing a NE wind direction at LGA and NYC off the sound, when the rest of the area has a west/nw wind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...