Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2023 - tracking the tropics


mcglups
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Yes, great post. It's important to understand this in great depth. 

I mean... whence the transition happens, or we are just flat out dealing with a nor'easter ...there are a couple aspect immediately/physically taking place that limit wind - particularly on the western-NW arc.

The air is stablizing in that sector, with cold entrainment cutting under the TC's circumvallet.  That lifts the wind field off the deck ... hasta la vista style. 

The barotropic model remains well ( better..) mixed with plenty of 'momentum transfer' and well ... TC are a lower tropospheric coupled model solution - particularly preferential to the warm ocean; that is in fact considered a quasi-coupled machinery. It really it's a miracle of nature on Earth that all that OHC can have a machinery available to directly exhaust that yato yato yato scaled heat storage.  

Anyway, baroclinic systems are not coupled nearly as proficiently ...though the warm sector itself can certainly do interesting things when the Warm conveyor belt is gradient pinched into a fire hose and a squalline then mixes that down.  I've see 60 mph winds along those ribbon echo babes October before....  rare though.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly what I was getting at with that post I made a few weeks back about colder waters. A slow moving storm is going to weaken and transition pretty quickly. 

How cold would they ned to be? Serious question as we are watching closely. NC waters are still in the 80s even up to almost DE


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spaizzo said:


How cold would they ned to be? Serious question as we are watching closely. NC waters are still in the 80s even up to almost DE


.

Lee would largely miss those warmer waters (assuming anyways). Historically, to get a significant cane to make landfall up here you need it to be hauling as it would have less time to weaken between being off the Carolina coast and a landfall up here. 

A slower moving storm traversing these colder waters though will give the storm ample time to undergo internal structural changes and evolution from tropical to ET

image.thumb.png.25c572f91193792f5860388f84b91a69.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This can't be ignored, but let's see we got TS wind gusts across a large part of the region as a result of an expanded wind field. Given the very saturated grounds and fully leaved trees power outages would be a greater concern than usual for winds that we usually see several times in the late fall/winter. 
This

Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spaizzo said:

West side if we were to be brushed. Lots of rain? Sorry after Irene I wouldn’t wish that rain inundation on anyone. Down here we’ve had some really good torrential rains the past day. More rain to come and in more rain and a little wind trees toppling due to moist ground would be my concern here. The flooding VT and other areas got during Irene the scars are still evident driving from Greenfield to Wilmington/Dover area. One thing I wouldn’t want to wish on anyone.


.

Don't forget we had that really rainy period in September right after Sandy. I lived by Thomaston Dam at the time, it was the second highest the water level ever got there. They let it out into Black Rock Lake and the water was halfway up a steeply inclined road that's no longer used. Crazy times.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SnoSki14 said:

Yeah because I want a hurricane to wreck my house. 

The people who want to see "big damage" simply do not understand and/or downplay the devastation that a redux of 38 would cause.  They vastly underestimate the time it would take to get fully back to normal. They assume it would be a matter of a few days. The reality is the vast majority of people in New England are ill prepared for anything remotely resembling a redux of 1938. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Great Snow 1717 said:

The people who want to see "big damage" simply do not understand and/or downplay the devastation that a redux of 38 would cause.  They vastly underestimate the time it would take to get fully back to normal. They assume it would be a matter of a few days. The reality is the vast majority of people in New England are ill prepared for anything remotely resembling a redux of 1938. 

mm.  I know what your getting at but there's probably dubious morality there, too -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Getting close to that time of the tropical season where I start hearing that voice in my head begging to just get past this p.o.s. journey and make it winter already. LOL

At least with tropical you always know you’re out. With winter everyone endures misses and misery, week after week after week. 

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Getting close to that time of the tropical season where I start hearing that voice in my head begging to just get past this p.o.s. journey and make it winter already. LOL

The period May 1st to October 1st is usually nothing more than a total bore fest...so I'm hearing that same voice in my head. Although some people here may assume I hear voices in my head much of the time!...but I can assure them that isn't the case!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly couldn't give a crap if we "get" Lee or Invest 97. I have no taste for weather spectacle IMBY especially where so many people have had so much damage this summer. My interest in tropical systems now begins and ends with how much ACE we can get this season. Positive correlation with BOS snowfall, after all. If a few more intense systems form anywhere in the NAtl basin and have some good duration, even if it's over the fish, that's fine with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MJOatleast7 said:

I honestly couldn't give a crap if we "get" Lee or Invest 97. I have no taste for weather spectacle IMBY especially where so many people have had so much damage this summer. My interest in tropical systems now begins and ends with how much ACE we can get this season. Positive correlation with BOS snowfall, after all. If a few more intense systems form anywhere in the NAtl basin and have some good duration, even if it's over the fish, that's fine with me.

Pretty good chance of AN ACE this season given where we are now. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

Lee would largely miss those warmer waters (assuming anyways). Historically, to get a significant cane to make landfall up here you need it to be hauling as it would have less time to weaken between being off the Carolina coast and a landfall up here. 

A slower moving storm traversing these colder waters though will give the storm ample time to undergo internal structural changes and evolution from tropical to ET

image.thumb.png.25c572f91193792f5860388f84b91a69.png

Agreed, and you provided a better map...

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bristolri_wx said:

missed that post! 

I think we saw something similar with the storm that came up a few years back. Ended up making landfall somewhere along Long Island. I remember there were some aggressive calls (from myself included) for stronger winds and even a LF hurricane, but it was clear the slower speed over the colder waters was going to yield big weakening and structural changes

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...