Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,597
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    DAinDC
    Newest Member
    DAinDC
    Joined

March 11th storm threat


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

The primary is in western PA so it floods the area with warmer air. It's not until the coastal takes over that we change to snow.

The norlun feature is our best bet and it has support from Rgem & Nam.

Normally norluns happen further N&E but the ESE track of coastal would favor our region. Probably another 1-2" type deal

The RGEM is pretty ugly but it’s also kind of dry. Wetter=snowier, drier=rain or white rain in this setup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NYC's best shot looks to be early Saturday morning when the coastal low starts to take over. Depending on the model, rain should become snow in the city between 3 and 6AM, continuing until 10AM. This shift should happen a couple hours earlier in New Jersey, Upstate NY and Connecticut.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is going to end up similar to the system from last week. Most areas should be under 6".

Most of the interior should see 2-4" with a few areas 4"+.

1-2" for NE NJ near the city, Central NJ and Southern Westchester.

Coating for the immediate coastal plain.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Winterweatherlover said:

I'm not tossing but not buying either. Someone will get a surprise but most models focus on the norlun feature over NJ Coast or near NYC and not over LI.  

Norlons are so hard to forecast though, even only a few days out so the range of possibilities are still fairly wide 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Winterweatherlover said:

I'm not tossing but not buying either. Someone will get a surprise but most models focus on the norlun feature over NJ Coast or near NYC and not over LI.  

I'm tossing because it's the GFS.

If the NAM/RGEM/HRRR show something similar tomorrow then maybe it's legit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ILoveWinter said:

Norlons are so hard to forecast though, even only a few days out so the range of possibilities are still fairly wide 

They are and I honestly hate them lol because so hard to forecast and most likely will get nothing if relying on it but if you do get lucky wow they can be fun. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Winterweatherlover said:

The NAM is not good either. Agree about RGEM or short range HRRR.  

LOL that is one thing that the NAM is actually good for.

People misuse it all the time but it was built to pick out small mesoscale features like this.

It also does well with temperature profiles in borderline setups, although it does tend to be a tad too cold while the RGEM tends to be too warm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a cliche at this point but whether or not we have an idea if the urban areas immediately near NYC and south east of there see decent accumulations will come down to nowcasting. We have a few more model cycles yet to go but I feel like we’re going to be windshield whipping up to the event. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nibor said:

It’s a cliche at this point but whether or not we have an idea if the urban areas immediately near NYC and south east of there see decent accumulations will come down to nowcasting. We have a few more model cycles yet to go but I feel like we’re going to be windshield whipping up to the event. 

You have a few things working for you at the coast. Most of the precip falls at night and we could get a few hours of moderate/heavy precip.

But the BL is warm and even though all areas should flip to snow eventually, it will be falling mostly on pavement in urban areas. Should see at least filtered March sunshine until mid-late afternoon. Bottom line it will have trouble accumulating outside of grassy areas unless it comes down very heavy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Winterweatherlover said:

The secondary definitely noticeably west and has more of an E path than SE which could be a game changer especially LI but we are inside 48 hours so running out of time for big changes.

HRRR did very well with the last event even in its long range, so we can hope it's correct with the cold snowy solution it showed on the 12z run. But too many other models don't look good for us to be optimistic for areas closer to the coast right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, winterwx21 said:

HRRR did very well with the last event even in its long range, so we can hope it's correct with the cold snowy solution it showed on the 12z run. But too many other models don't look good for us to be optimistic for areas closer to the coast right now. 

Snow to rain scenarios almost always seem to do better than rain to snow scenarios near the coast so not surprised this is trending worse without powerful dynamics.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thermals on even the high res guidance are pretty poor here.  I'd be fairly surprised if anything measurable fell in the metro itself UNLESS the axis of the IT feature ends up dead over the top and you could probably drop 2-3 wet inches of snow before by 9am it melted

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

Hrrr is pretty good

The HRRR is usually too cold at this range but the good news is it does show the meat of the heaviest QPF being over the area...if that verifies we have a shot but these things will tend to end up more NE in time.  I'd like being probably in SW CT at this point in time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...