Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

The last hurrah? Putting all the eggs in the Tuesday 3/14 basket


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, wxeyeNH said:

Frickin models.   I'm glad I don't read this thread too much.  For example NAM had me at 1.67" last run but .33" this run.  You all have to deal with R/S lines but up here it is how much does the goods come north and how much does the Whites shadow me.

Me looking for a C NH crush job on the models this morning. 
image.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Its going to be better than 10:1 in some spots. 

Yeah highest terrain maybe. If we start seeing more NAM-esque soundings, then higher ratios become more likely. But we have a lot of solutions that are pretty warm in the BL still. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah highest terrain maybe. If we start seeing more NAM-esque soundings, then higher ratios become more likely. But we have a lot of solutions that are pretty warm in the BL still. 

NAM, is greater than 10:1 for even some lower terrain. Other than that, it would be higher terrain. Lose ghst fu%ing s stream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TalcottWx said:

7h vertical velocity on the Nam looks mighty good your way, unless I'm evaluating it incorrectly. 

An arm of fronto will probably swing through for a bit. It’s a close call up here for something bigger so I’m keeping a casual eye on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

An arm of fronto will probably swing through for a bit. It’s a close call up here for something bigger so I’m keeping a casual eye on it. 

I liked that look even up to pf when i saw it this am.. That elevated area west of New England in New York around alb gets deform crushed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For ratios, outside of the banding they're likely going to be relatively low (probably around 7:1). Going to have to really keep in mind there is likely going to be subsidence involved. Also have to watch for pockets of dry air being ingested in, which if that happens into the DGZ is going to kill too. Then of course you have the boundary-layer issues and of course...wind.

Under the heaviest banding I think ratios upwards of 13:1 to 15:1 are plausible. But this will be better assessed after bufkit is available.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

For ratios, outside of the banding they're likely going to be relatively low (probably around 7:1). Going to have to really keep in mind there is likely going to be subsidence involved. Also have to watch for pockets of dry air being ingested in, which if that happens into the DGZ is going to kill too. Then of course you have the boundary-layer issues and of course...wind.

Under the heaviest banding I think ratios upwards of 13:1 to 15:1 are plausible. But this will be better assessed after bufkit is available.

Will you be moving the bigger amounts a tick south on your first call clown map?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

Forget the snow maps...time to focus on these products

image.thumb.png.2901be4974c1bffe4f3658cec2dfc34b.png

That is a great product….but those are only useful if the model is accurate. I wouldn’t trust the 51 hour NAM at this point. They’ll be better to use tomorrow when hopefully we have more model consensus. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...