SchaumburgStormer Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 A really nice sunset: storm total 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malacka11 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 26 minutes ago, SchaumburgStormer said: A really nice sunset: storm total It's okay we'll bag the next one. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torchageddon Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 I measured in different spots 8-10 cm or 4". Drifting was present of course. It was light-mod snow the heavy stuff didn't get here. This all occurred in 3 hours. I don't have a snowboard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 These busters are getting old Totals were terrible 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 7 hours ago, Stebo said: 4.3" here at home, idk if any compacted, I'll assume so but that is what was down when I got home. Getting kinda windy too. Not sure if you got any rain/sleet, but it absolutely compacted here after pouring rain/sleet. 3.5 wet snow + rain/sleet + 2.0 wet snow = depth 4.2 of absolute concrete. DTW finished with 6.2", liquid total 1.11". Morning depth 5". With 6.2" at DTW, they have leap frogged me on season total, sitting at 27.4". My 5.5" puts me at 27.1". Love this lol: WEATHER CONDITIONS THE FOLLOWING WEATHER WAS RECORDED YESTERDAY. THUNDERSTORM LIGHT RAIN HEAVY SNOW SNOW LIGHT SNOW FOG FOG W/VISIBILITY <= 1/4 MILE HAZE BLOWING SNOW 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said: These busters are getting old Totals were terrible Ratios were an issue (as feared) more than qpf for the immediate south burbs. It was like when you pour water in sand to make a sand castle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Nice cutoff there on the northwest side. Looks like Peoria just barely missed out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonger Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Get it jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambana Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Some of the most insane sustained winds I’ve seen around these parts in quite sometime. CMI recorded a 70mph wind gust, with multiple trees uprooted, power outages, tree damage. while the snow didn’t really stick, the conditions were just legit for quite awhile. Such a dynamic system. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWMT30 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Gotta give it up to the GFS here locally... Although we did not get the numbers it was showing and its's slight bump north there overall it held steady on the storm while the other models had it south for a time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary67 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 I would of thought the CMC and possibly the Ukie did the best from longer range with this system. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Kind of an interesting image here. If you look closely you can see sort of a U-shaped boundary between heavier snowpack and lower snowpack. I remember seeing a feature move south on radar yesterday, almost looked like an outflow boundary moving south against the northward moving precip at the time. It was the transition from rain to snow, where sort of a cold pool had made it down and had changed the precip over to all snow at the surface. Looks like it made it down to about where those arrows are. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SolidIcewx Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 1 hour ago, AWMT30 said: Gotta give it up to the GFS here locally... Although we did not get the numbers it was showing and its's slight bump north there overall it held steady on the storm while the other models had it south for a time. For the sake of power outages I was kinda happy when it changed over for a bit I think it helped the metro. The trees were weighed down more then the ice storm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCNYILWX Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 I would of thought the CMC and possibly the Ukie did the best from longer range with this system. The CMC was not good, right for the wrong reasons in the Chicago metro. It was too weak and too far south with the surface low, and didn't capture the dynamic cooling that occurred to support the accums of 2-5" of paste in the southeast 1/3 of the CWA. It only gets credit for having the farther south precip swath. GFS operational did fairly well and then once the ECMWF adjusted, it did pretty well, not a great performance overall though because it was too far north until pretty late in the game. We only have the UKMET via Pivotal Wx, but it did perform pretty well at a longer lead time. NAMs performed the worst of the models we commonly utilize. HRRR and other CAMs did well with capturing the high winds in Central IL and IN. This event was also a good case for the algorithm snow maps to be banned. Forecast positive snow depth change was the best option for snow amounts. 4 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 The snowfall map that were showing 12-20" were great for laughs though 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 About 11" here. Nice paste job. One of the heaviest snows I've ever shovelled. The thunder snow last night was epic though. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SolidIcewx Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 2 hours ago, michsnowfreak said: Ratios were an issue (as feared) more than qpf for the immediate south burbs. It was like when you pour water in sand to make a sand castle. I think this winter will be known for the destructive nature of the winter storms we have gotten 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Ended up with 12". It was a great storm. We just spent the past 5 hours outside playing, shoveling and did a 4 mile snow walk. Now it is time to rest. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 West and NW burbs of Detroit 8-11" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 31 minutes ago, SolidIcewx said: For the sake of power outages I was kinda happy when it changed over for a bit I think it helped the metro. The trees were weighed down more then the ice storm My neighbors car canopy collapsed last night. We were surprised as it was relatively new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnwx85 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Ended up with 3” on pavement. Around 5”-6” on grass. Not the big dog I was hoping for but it was fun to track and walking around in the death band was a blast. I’ll take what I can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollydog Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Finished with 10” in Auburn Hills. Lost power and internet. We also lost two trees. Not going to lie, kind of done with this winter. Beautiful but destructive is how I would describe it.. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OHweather Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 1 hour ago, RCNYILWX said: The CMC was not good, right for the wrong reasons in the Chicago metro. It was too weak and too far south with the surface low, and didn't capture the dynamic cooling that occurred to support the accums of 2-5" of paste in the southeast 1/3 of the CWA. It only gets credit for having the farther south precip swath. GFS operational did fairly well and then once the ECMWF adjusted, it did pretty well, not a great performance overall though because it was too far north until pretty late in the game. We only have the UKMET via Pivotal Wx, but it did perform pretty well at a longer lead time. NAMs performed the worst of the models we commonly utilize. HRRR and other CAMs did well with capturing the high winds in Central IL and IN. This event was also a good case for the algorithm snow maps to be banned. Forecast positive snow depth change was the best option for snow amounts. Was looking at the HRRR positive depth change, it did pretty well yesterday morning with the max swath (and maybe was just a tad too low on some on the fringes in eastern IL?). I thought the rates/QPF could support12”+ lollis where the band would pivot between N IN/SE MI/S ON (figured when rates were really heavy ratios would come up enough to allow for that kind of accumulation) but it seems like about 11” of concrete was the most anyone could muster. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HillsdaleMIWeather Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Got 10 inches of pure sludgey concrete. Credit to the NWS offices, the six to ten call panned out well 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonger Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 Models getting quite impressive these days. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo6899 Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 2 hours ago, dmc76 said: West and NW burbs of Detroit 8-11" In a fairly short period of time too. 5-midnight. Often it takes 12+ hours to get 6-12. Another thing is the clearing after a snowstorm. We can go weeks without seeing the sun, but its amazing how often there's clear skies the next morning after a storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SolidIcewx Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 54 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said: In a fairly short period of time too. 5-midnight. Often it takes 12+ hours to get 6-12. Another thing is the clearing after a snowstorm. We can go weeks without seeing the sun, but its amazing how often there's clear skies the next morning after a storm. I know right I seen the moon and starts by about 2am last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogueWaves Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 59 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said: In a fairly short period of time too. 5-midnight. Often it takes 12+ hours to get 6-12. Another thing is the clearing after a snowstorm. We can go weeks without seeing the sun, but its amazing how often there's clear skies the next morning after a storm. Almost a given we get a nice sunny day after a S stream SW hits and departs. Awesome storm, fun to see cars stuck on snowy roads in the metro. Thanks to snow actually accumulating on the pavement this time, plow banks and piles are legit. Only minor negative is I'm still one of these stats: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted March 4, 2023 Share Posted March 4, 2023 4 hours ago, Lightning said: Ended up with 12". It was a great storm. We just spent the past 5 hours outside playing, shoveling and did a 4 mile snow walk. Now it is time to rest. Your area jackpotted 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now