Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Feb 28th-March 1st long duration Miller B threat


George001
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Don’t worry, we still have 84hrs of the nam to bring this north.

I thought the models would more likely adjust south , the thing is ..if the short wave was also *sheared  ( not just south) it would have even been significantly worse as someone else alluded to. I’ll hope it tickles a tad north but not much 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cyclone-68 said:

If 3-6 is the ceiling for this storm I think I’d rather chase the futility record…Or second least snowiest all time whatever it turns out to be..

There are a lot of CT posters who would gladly take that much.  Anything over 4" snowfall and I'll be happy because my kid and his friends have had very short sledding windows.  Now we have the ice base and some snow on top would be awesome. I'll track storms a week out but I generally don't get too invested until inside of 72 hours.  If this ends up being pedestrian it's by no means a bust, to me, because the big potential, still needed a lot of moving parts to come together.  To me "busts" only occur inside of 48 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

There are a lot of CT posters who would gladly take that much.  Anything over 4" snowfall and I'll be happy because my kid and his friends have had very short sledding windows.  Now we have the ice base and some snow on top would be awesome. I'll track storms a week out but I generally don't get too invested until inside of 72 hours.  If this ends up being pedestrian it's by no means a bust, to me, because the big potential, still needed a lot of moving parts to come together.  To me "busts" only occur inside of 48 hours.

Meh..3-6 is like kissing your sister but I understand mine is likely the minority opinion..if I had kids like you I might look at it differently to be honest 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

There are a lot of CT posters who would gladly take that much.  Anything over 4" snowfall and I'll be happy because my kid and his friends have had very short sledding windows.  Now we have the ice base and some snow on top would be awesome. I'll track storms a week out but I generally don't get too invested until inside of 72 hours.  If this ends up being pedestrian it's by no means a bust, to me, because the big potential, still needed a lot of moving parts to come together.  To me "busts" only occur inside of 48 hours.

Local brewery out here had to close off their sledding hill for today because of the ice

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TalcottWx said:

No one is stupid. I am saying it is stupid to be enthralled by a single euro run at that range. It was ultimately still in clown range. If that's the case, there shouldn't have been what seems to be a needlessly emotional investment over 100+ hours out. Those runs should have been taken with a grain of salt. Hard to be disappointed if that's the case IMO. 

 

It was more than a single Euro run suggesting over a foot of snow and it was not in clown range. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

It was more than a single Euro run suggesting over a foot of snow and it was not in clown range. 

Yeah the 12-18” runs were on several cycles and models. Only that one crazy run with like 30 inches was on the euro about 6 days out. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea...obviously 40" wasn't happening, but this fraudulent hindsight that 15" or so was never realistic is nauseating.

I still think 15” is possible. I wouldn’t forecast it but it’s foolish to automatically rule it out. All it takes a strong WCB thump of 8-10” and then limp to another 5-6” with a pseudo-CCB/IVT over 12 hours. Again, I think that’s becoming less likely, but it isn’t outside the envelope of realistic solutions. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea...obviously 40" wasn't happening, but this fraudulent hindsight that 15" or so was never realistic is nauseating.

If you would have never put out a forecast at that range for 15" of snow, I'd argue that outcome isn't considered very realistic yet. Maybe I'm approaching this the wrong way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...