Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Very persistent signal for moderate snow and ice impact between "Wed night" and "Thur night" this week


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

At this range and considering the recency/complexion of the various persistence' in the guidance ( cross analysis, too), the the risk associated with this somewhat protracted event is situated along I-90 in NYS through roughly RUT-PWM for snow, where astride this region along the south by some 200 miles ( give or take) there's likely to be a gradient of IP, ICE, then cold rain. 

Snow amounts look to be 6-8" with more in favored elevations/cold ratio loading ...and/or impossible to predetermine meso banding - which I feel there may be some in this latter aspect. This is an overrunning scenario, with a powerful left exit/lateral to entrance jet structure associated with the main short wave mechanics...torpedoing by N of an intensely defined low level polar boundary. That boundary is likely to be very intense at elevation, up the warm boundary slope, where it is then encounters an evacuating circumstance. This will enhance lift around (likely...) some frontogenic structures/very narrow.    I wouldn't venture a precise idea on the width of the snowing region of this total event, but would suggest it is not spread out all over hell's creation in size.

IP vs ICE and where?  

Firstly, a cold thrust/"tuck" showed up yesterday at finite analysis of a lot of guidance ( Thurs afternoon...).  That is/was built into our climate, and given the general synopsis as it has existed in the guidance for days ( really...), the possibility is/was assumed in this particular scenario.  The models outright showed that happening and still are.

There is an antecedent building +PP over western QUE that's put there by PV confluent against the southern ridge wall  - that is a large scale scaffolding that is physically connected(able) to the smaller scales. These finite lower tropospheric features in the guidance are thus less likely merely noise, given that totality.   Trying to establish some confidence in that actually taking place, because it matters greatly on who gets affected by IP vs ICE vs cold rain across the region of southern NYS tier, to S of ~ rt 2 along N Mass.  

I personally believe these above cold implications are too overwhelming to ignore - and frankly...I would not bother down playing them in this case, unless the short term on this corrects abundantly N.  I don't believe this latter adjustment is very likey, however, ...because this overall 'needle thread' longitudinal event is being "locked" into a position guided by the PV press against the -PNA/La Nina persistent/circulation base state.  I suspect this is why we are seeing such a persistent signal for this overall event, it's got the deterministic advantage of competing titanic forces, which by virtue of their size ...command a lot of physical proxy on the flow set...etc.  

Basically it's a higher confidence total event.  The details will be ironed out during the next 4 or so days.. .but I feel pretty confident this needs its separate evaluation window at this time. 

Special considerations ... 

- QPF may be a bit of a challenge particularly S of the snow transition to IP axis.   The excessively thermally compressed overall nature of this in the N-S, combined with the idea that 'lift' may in fact move off of that mix axis, means that precipitation could ( not saying it will...) end up shredding and become more intermittent in nature from lower growth. In fact, ....IP could relax to pixie dust between rt 2 and the Pike, should the suspected cold acceleration arrive under a ceiling where the lift has moved off.    This is just a possibility...  Lots of potential for cold wedging here, with equally 700 mb push over top may set up more prolific fall rates in the snow growth areas of the soundings in Central NE axis.

- the trailing 'main low pressure' may offer a burst of heaving returns as the system is exiting.   

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Wasn’t paying any attention but now I’m casually watching. Certainly thread worthy. Could be an impactful mixed precipitation event here in northern CT. 

For now I'd say that is higher ice to IP ratio/result ... from there up to the Pike and down the Pike length... but tuck getting under way mid day Thursday - if it is even identifiable at that time, probably makes the eastern end of the Pike more IP/pixie dusty. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Wild gradient on the ICON.

icon-all-neng-t2m_f-7186000.thumb.png.667226ff38964f2e370b8aaa069717ba.png

I have no use or need for some sleet/frz drizzle or 33 degree rain....I prefer those 70s up here, mid 60s would be just fine as well. Icon is the only one bringing those warm temps into the SW portions of SNE, so it probably is wrong. GFS is 30-34 here around the same time period. Not even close for 100 hrs out

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rcostell said:

How much for Philly? (kidding). Tip- Interested in your thoughts on possibilty of continued cold "press"  vs  the omnipresent southeast ridge.  Seems like these forces are currently depicted as deadlocked?  Thanks, trying to learn... as spend a lot of time just west (eastern ADK's) of BTV. 

I'm not sure exactly what you're asking?   ...is Philly in contention for this..??  If so, no ... this is a gradient contingent scenario, compressed along a relatively narrow corridor .... like I said, 'probably' within 150 miles N/S of roughly I-90/Mohawk Trail/SNE/CNE/NNE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Why are some models showing the tuck arriving faster/ more pronounced in se Mass than virtually all of CT and other areas west? 
 

Closer to the cold drain?

It funnels down along the coastal plain on a NE wind to the right of the ORH hills...like a back door front.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

I know I’ve been bearish to say the least about winter down here, but we toss that into the Atlantic. Much much colder down here in CT for this one IMO.

Yep. ICON tossed far for those 60s in CT. Pretty big outlier compared to other guidance which mainly keeps that warm sector down in central NJ and southward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...