Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

El Nino 2023-2024


 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

I don't think he's a denier though (I think he stated that he understands the rate of change proceeds at different rates in different places.)  I like more complete datasets too, and I think 1950 onwards is a good period to use since 1950 is when most of our records began to be kept in a more reliable way (it's also the beginning of the satellite era.)

 

......not saying him specifically but there are numerous people on these forums that downplay the impact of climate change. 

The temps should be compared to the entire available database as opposed to 30 year averages. Doing so would allow people to grasp the full impact that climate change has had and continues to have. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Great Snow 1717 said:

......not saying him specifically but there are numerous people on these forums that downplay the impact of climate change. 

The temps should be compared to the entire available database as opposed to 30 year averages. Doing so would allow people to grasp the full impact that climate change has had and continues to have. 

 

I dont like 30 year averages either, it's a very arbitrary number to use.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Great Snow 1717 said:

it skews the "numbers"

at the same time we can't use the entire climate history of every station either though because these are varying periods for different places so it would be an apples to oranges comparison (for example comparing Central Park to JFK airport, one's period of record began in the 1860s while the other's began in the 1950s lol.)  So I think at least doubling that recorded history period to 1950-onwards makes sense because most of our reliable airport stations began keeping records in the 1950s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LibertyBell said:

at the same time we can't use the entire climate history of every station either though because these are varying periods for different places so it would be an apples to oranges comparison (for example comparing Central Park to JFK airport, one's period of record began in the 1860s while the other's began in the 1950s lol.)  So I think at least doubling that recorded history period to 1950-onwards makes sense because most of our reliable airport stations began keeping records in the 1950s.

I agree regarding the stations but the long term dataset would still provide worthwhile data to do comparisons. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, GaWx said:

 I’m still amazed at how the EPS went from this on 12/26/23 run (mean down to -3 and highest rest of run only +16):

IMG_8806.png.9349fa2c4cecc9cdb769e26b3102b401.png

To this just 5 days later (12/31 run) (mean down only to +10 and lowest Jan 9th through end up at +17):

IMG_8807.png.737087328c800442c51df2620bd13e5f.png


However, despite that, the 12/31 run overall is a significantly colder run for much of the US, including the E US, especially for this week:

 Week of 1/15-22:

12/26/23 run:

IMG_8812.thumb.webp.4818e786f6715f655e44eea066f6a2e3.webp

 

12/31/23 run:

IMG_8813.thumb.webp.aed7b2d17afec3ce6c686ec3398d16aa.webp

 

Also, look at how cold on the 12/31/23 run is the week of 2/5-12, the coldest by a good margin in the E US of the four runs extending that far:

IMG_8811.thumb.webp.df5dcc51d366017481d58d1368f64e3e.webp

 The 1/1 Euro Weeklies have an even stronger SPV late Jan/early Feb with the ensemble mean right at climo then (see below). (Look in my quoted post to see how much weaker was the SPV on the 12/26 run.) The last two weeks of the run, 1/29-2/5 and 2/5-12, warmed notably in the E US vs yesterday’s run (connection to stronger SPV??).

IMG_8821.png.72d0f16a26741098f962373e78d7db5e.png
 

 OTOH before that, the week of 1/15-22 on the 1/1 Weeklies got even colder in the E US with BN temps nearly everywhere (see below). This is now the coldest week of the run in the E US as a whole! Also, keep in mind that this is during about the coldest climo of the winter for many. Interestingly, the models are suggesting that the MJO will then be in the MC though hopefully weak. Last winter’s coldest E US was when it was in the MC. Though it appears there might then be a moderate -PNA, there looks to then be a strong -NAO/-AO largely running the show. The run for 1/15-22 from just 6 days earlier (12/26 run posted in my quoted post) had AN temps for most of the E US!

IMG_8820.thumb.webp.28bf4a8c8d38b7007233d1b0ed22deec.webp

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Great Snow 1717 said:

Deniers are going to deny...

Lmao. Pointing out a fact or weather statistic makes you a denier. What have I got to deny? I live in an area with 4 distinct seasons & do my part at being friendly to the environment. Im all good. I forget that posting weather stats on a weather board offends some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:

Lmao. Pointing out a fact or weather statistic makes you a denier. What have I got to deny? I live in an area with 4 distinct seasons & do my part at being friendly to the environment. Im all good. I forget that posting weather stats on a weather board offends some. 

Dude I already wrote that I was not referring to you lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of disputed MJO movement on the models at the moment. I expect to see phase 4-6 again by Jan 20 or so. We'll see. Wave may die or have competing centers of influence before it gets there though.

CPC still looks on board with my outlook for January. I found 1993-94 was a pretty strong match to opposite conditions of this year when I did my outlook, so it makes sense to see the weird storm patterns and ongoing persisting heat to me up there. In the short term January 1973 has shown up on some of these CPC looks for the 6-10 and 8-14 ideas. I suspect we're actually getting very close to the part of the pattern that will support a huge, fluky snowstorm in the South ala 1973. I've been expecting that in the 1/15-2/15 time frame, if it is to happen.

Screenshot-2024-01-02-7-06-36-PMScreenshot-2024-01-02-7-06-49-PM

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, raindancewx said:

A lot of disputed MJO movement on the models at the moment. I expect to see phase 4-6 again by Jan 20 or so. We'll see. Wave may die or have competing centers of influence before it gets there though.

CPC still looks on board with my outlook for January. I found 1993-94 was a pretty strong match to opposite conditions of this year when I did my outlook, so it makes sense to see the weird storm patterns and ongoing persisting heat to me up there. In the short term January 1973 has shown up on some of these CPC looks for the 6-10 and 8-14 ideas. I suspect we're actually getting very close to the part of the pattern that will support a huge, fluky snowstorm in the South ala 1973. I've been expecting that in the 1/15-2/15 time frame, if it is to happen.

Screenshot-2024-01-02-7-06-36-PMScreenshot-2024-01-02-7-06-49-PM

The period starting near the end of the 8-14 looks to be when the cold moves SE into the E US per the last several EPS runs. There are indications of an Arctic high plunging down into the N Plains ~1/16-7. And that interestingly enough looks to be when the MJO is in the MC phases. Note though that the EPS and CMC have only a weak/near or inside COD MC, which would allow for a better chance for cold then. OTOH, the GEFS is much warmer then in the E US, not surprising since it has a very strong MC MJO:

IMG_8831.png.f79b4b5fbda5c4b1d070b6c6041975db.png
Note also that the GLAAM is per this CFS rising to a + soon afterward:

image.thumb.png.0070ad8abcdfee207dfd069e309422bf.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GaWx said:

The period starting near the end of the 8-14 looks to be when the cold moves SE into the E US per the last several EPS runs. There are indications of an Arctic high plunging down into the N Plains ~1/16-7. And that interestingly enough looks to be when the MJO is in the MC phases. Note though that the EPS and CMC have only a weak/near or inside COD MC, which would allow for a better chance for cold then. OTOH, the GEFS is much warmer then in the E US, not surprising since it has a very strong MC MJO:

IMG_8831.png.f79b4b5fbda5c4b1d070b6c6041975db.png
Note also that the GLAAM is per this CFS rising to a + soon afterward:

image.thumb.png.0070ad8abcdfee207dfd069e309422bf.png


The 0Z EPS (bc) forecasted mid Jan mean phase 4 MJO amplitude has increased significantly since yesterday, not what I wanted to see for midmonth:

 Yesterday’s (1/2) EPS had ~1.00 (right on circle and then going inside it) phase 4 amp for 1/17:

IMG_8833.png.fce4684a492fa92620d66bc92627d6f4.png
 


Today’s (1/3) EPS has a well outside the circle ~1.65 phase 4 amp for 1/17 (hoping this is just a burp):

IMG_8832.png.9045dbbe4ec3381e279547e40fc6937e.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canadian look for January is in finally. It has weakened the transition of the El Nino to the West, and has a much weaker, but east based look throughout Jan-Mar. By Apr-May, we are rapidly transitioning into an east based La Nina. I suspect the Spring will be a bit like 2005, but it's early.

Image

Image

The models have been forecasting to much warmth with this event for months, even at short ranges. So I think a faster collapse of the El Nino is possible. No reason to think we verify on the warm side of the Euro plume.

Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the? The EPS mean for 1/17-18 fell sharply from yesterday’s +14 to today’s +6. There are ~~20% of members with a major SSW 1/15-19 vs only 5% yesterday. We know that the EPS has been strongly biased to the too weak side in recent weeks. So, I’m going to assume this is just a burp, especially with the other 0Z ensembles not showing this:

IMG_8835.png.c44a7d464b32d81d16c12dd3ff23c7a2.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The Euro Weeklies for today are colder in the E US vs yesterday for all of the weeks covering 1/15-2/12. The week 1/22-29 is especially colder. Perhaps this is related to the weaker mean SPV at mid-month. It is somewhat surprising because the EPS MJO today is much stronger in phase 4 at midmonth.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

-The ONI for OND came in at +1.94, not quite super.

-The RONI for OND came in at +1.51, barely strong.

-Dec ERSST came in at +2.07 vs the Dec OISST of +1.99. So, ERSST continues to come in slightly warmer than OISST, which may be significant going forward as we see whether or not unrounded NDJ ONI comes in at +2.00+, which would give us a super.

-Nov ERSST was +2.02. So, to get a super for NDJ, Jan ERSST only needs to be +1.91. With the slightly cooler OISST now up at +2.10, I consider that chance to be high as of now.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raindancewx said:

Canadian look for January is in finally. It has weakened the transition of the El Nino to the West, and has a much weaker, but east based look throughout Jan-Mar. By Apr-May, we are rapidly transitioning into an east based La Nina. I suspect the Spring will be a bit like 2005, but it's early.

Image

Image

The models have been forecasting to much warmth with this event for months, even at short ranges. So I think a faster collapse of the El Nino is possible. No reason to think we verify on the warm side of the Euro plume.

Image

Might be more like 2010 for the spring and summer based on the magnitude of the change.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, GaWx said:

-The ONI for OND came in at +1.94, not quite super.

-The RONI for OND came in at +1.51, barely strong.

-Dec ERSST came in at +2.07 vs the Dec OISST of +1.99. So, ERSST continues to come in slightly warmer than OISST, which may be significant going forward as we see whether or not unrounded NDJ ONI comes in at +2.00+, which would give us a super.

-Nov ERSST was +2.02. So, to get a super for NDJ, Jan ERSST only needs to be +1.91. With the slightly cooler OISST now up at +2.10, I consider that chance to be high as of now.

Is super an official designation? I'm not aware of that if it is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 The Euro Weeklies for today are colder in the E US vs yesterday for all of the weeks covering 1/15-2/12. The week 1/22-29 is especially colder. Perhaps this is related to the weaker mean SPV at mid-month. It is somewhat surprising because the EPS MJO today is much stronger in phase 4 at midmonth.

Would you say the week of 1/22-29 is going to be the coldest of the season, even moreso than any future cold that might come in February?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, raindancewx said:

Canadian look for January is in finally. It has weakened the transition of the El Nino to the West, and has a much weaker, but east based look throughout Jan-Mar. By Apr-May, we are rapidly transitioning into an east based La Nina. I suspect the Spring will be a bit like 2005, but it's early.

Image

Image

The models have been forecasting to much warmth with this event for months, even at short ranges. So I think a faster collapse of the El Nino is possible. No reason to think we verify on the warm side of the Euro plume.

Image

Not even sure a modoki la nina pattern can be a thing but the warm pool in the subsurface near the dateline is not fading like we typically see, especially in what are considered east based events. Wonder if we hold a nice warm pool in region 4 and western 3.4 into next winter?

It does look like region 3 is about to cliff dive coming up through january.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GaWx said:

-The ONI for OND came in at +1.94, not quite super.

-The RONI for OND came in at +1.51, barely strong.

-Dec ERSST came in at +2.07 vs the Dec OISST of +1.99. So, ERSST continues to come in slightly warmer than OISST, which may be significant going forward as we see whether or not unrounded NDJ ONI comes in at +2.00+, which would give us a super.

-Nov ERSST was +2.02. So, to get a super for NDJ, Jan ERSST only needs to be +1.91. With the slightly cooler OISST now up at +2.10, I consider that chance to be high as of now.

Some of the more intense trades we have seen so far are coming over the next 2 weeks. Looking like a race to see how long it can sustain itself. If region 3 begins to cool rapidly coming up the chances seem to fall quite a bit. Surprised december came in a little warmer than thought.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2024 at 9:29 AM, GaWx said:

 The 1/1 Euro Weeklies have an even stronger SPV late Jan/early Feb with the ensemble mean right at climo then (see below). (Look in my quoted post to see how much weaker was the SPV on the 12/26 run.) The last two weeks of the run, 1/29-2/5 and 2/5-12, warmed notably in the E US vs yesterday’s run (connection to stronger SPV??).

IMG_8821.png.72d0f16a26741098f962373e78d7db5e.png
 

 OTOH before that, the week of 1/15-22 on the 1/1 Weeklies got even colder in the E US with BN temps nearly everywhere (see below). This is now the coldest week of the run in the E US as a whole! Also, keep in mind that this is during about the coldest climo of the winter for many. Interestingly, the models are suggesting that the MJO will then be in the MC though hopefully weak. Last winter’s coldest E US was when it was in the MC. Though it appears there might then be a moderate -PNA, there looks to then be a strong -NAO/-AO largely running the show. The run for 1/15-22 from just 6 days earlier (12/26 run posted in my quoted post) had AN temps for most of the E US!

IMG_8820.thumb.webp.28bf4a8c8d38b7007233d1b0ed22deec.webp

Does it really matter if the PV splits, anyway? Maybe a wind reversal would make it tougher to recover, but other than that.....who cares? I mean, don't get me wrong....I would rather get the reversal, but I don't think its crucial.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LibertyBell said:

Is super an official designation? I'm not aware of that if it is.

 

I go by the unrounded ONI peaking at +2.00+. Others may define it differently.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...