Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

 

This won't cut it for March

eps_T2maMean_nhem_fh288-360.thumb.gif.7ec92c2d3eef6e354737bd2b4c1062bc.gif

it's early March. it's a climatologically snowier period than much of December, that would be fine. late March I would agree, but that's not an issue at this time of year 

if you have strong blocking you can snow to the coast until March 20th or so

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also moving up 

Looks like very strong -PNA, +EPO, +AO. The only thing it’s got going for it is the -NAO. It’s going to be March, where’s the arctic air? March, 2018 had -EPO and cross-polar flow delivering arctic air, that’s why it was such an epic month. We don’t have that this time
  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, snowman19 said:


Looks like very strong -PNA, +EPO, +AO. The only thing it’s got going for it is the -NAO. It’s going to be March, where’s the arctic air? March, 2018 had -EPO and cross-polar flow delivering arctic air, that’s why it was such an epic month. We don’t have that this time

actually all the cold was bottled in eurasia which screwed the metro area out of huge amounts with the first two coastals

Composite Plot

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

We've been in this negative-NAO correlation/Pacific thing since 2013, and more so 2019. March 2018 was a west-based NAO block that came from SSW. I am afraid the strength of -NAO will only be mirrored by strength of +EPO/-PNA. 

Chuck seems to be on to what I have been noticing. Is this the IO warming that is causing this?

Does anyone know or have a theory on the catalyst?

This may be the recent NAO SE ridge linkage answer. It's more the EPO RNA intensity than Atlantic water temps. If you have a full latitude trough in the west guess what, there is no way you can avoid a ridge linking to the NAO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, forkyfork said:

actually all the cold was bottled in eurasia which screwed the metro area out of huge amounts with the first two coastals

i'm sure i've posted this before but i'll post it again. a few degrees cooler and the metro would have easily gotten 18+ from this:

nam-radar-friday-march-2-2018-noon.png?w=1024&h=772&crop=1

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Chuck seems to be on to what I have been noticing. Is this the IO warming that is causing this?

Does anyone know or have a theory on the catalyst?

This may be the recent NAO SE ridge linkage answer. It's more the EPO RNA intensity than Atlantic water temps. If you have a full latitude trough in the west guess what, there is no way you can avoid a ridge linking to the NAO.

Maybe someone is buying up natural gas? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

it's early March. it's a climatologically snowier period than much of December, that would be fine. late March I would agree, but that's not an issue at this time of year 

if you have strong blocking you can snow to the coast until March 20th or so

The MJO may finally head into phase 8 at the largest amplitude of the year which can finally lessen the grip of the RNA. EURO is much quicker than the GEFS so I hope it's correct. GEFS is after the 10th. Posted the ECMWF above.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another observation.

Since 2013 generally speaking Decembers have been warmer/less snowy and our March/springs have been colder and snowier (even a recent white rain/dusting in May).

Thinking aloud, perhaps the IO warming works against us with longer wavelengths and actually works in our favor when the wavelengths shorten?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EURO has a quicker loop into 8 (if some are concerned about mid March temps).
image.png.1bbb7f9f36933be1e90ba3ea99130bf8.png

If you want something in March, you have a 15 day window (3/1-3/15). Anything after that point would have to be a freak, anomalous event. Climo, sun angle and length of day are all against you by 3/15 and it only gets worse from there
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, snowman19 said:


If you want something in March, you have a 15 day window (3/1-3/15). Anything after that point would have to be a freak, anomalous event. Climo, sun angle and length of day are all against you by 3/15 and it only gets worse from there

Really depends on where your location is in the sub forum.

Away from Long island, coastal NJ it can still work (obviously north of 84).

Of course timing too (cloud cover arrives later in the overnight to allow for more radiational cooling, precip arrives 2 to 4 am, intensity picks up in the AM to compensate for the rising sun).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EastonSN+ said:

Really depends on where your location is in the sub forum.

Away from Long island, coastal NJ it can still work (obviously north of 84).

Of course timing too (cloud cover arrives later in the overnight to allow for more radiational cooling, precip arrives 2 to 4 am, intensity picks up in the AM to compensate for the rising sun).

NYC Metro is the worst because of Urban Heating (aka March 2018) for any kind of marginal event. But yes you are right the timing and temps are critical. If it's 3/20 and it's in the 20s at night the sun angle is a non factor, or even in the daytime if it's below freezing the sun angle doesn't matter as much.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brooklynwx99 said:

it's early March. it's a climatologically snowier period than much of December, that would be fine. late March I would agree, but that's not an issue at this time of year 

if you have strong blocking you can snow to the coast until March 20th or so

I think we're too far south to benefit. SNE could do well. 

Unfortunately I see us getting stuck between the very warm, sunny pattern (60s & 70s) and the cold, wintry one further north. 

So a lot of dreary 40s & 50s. The GFS has a very early spring backdoor looking pattern for us with a nasty cold tuck.

That would only worsen under a -NAO blocking pattern. 

The 12z GFS is a perfect illustration of what I mean. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

I think we're too far south to benefit. SNE could do well. 

Unfortunately I see us getting stuck between the very warm, sunny pattern (60s & 70s) and the cold, wintry one further north. 

So a lot of dreary 40s & 50s. The GFS has a very early spring backdoor looking pattern for us with a nasty cold tuck.

That would only worsen under a -NAO blocking pattern. 

The 12z GFS is a perfect illustration of what I mean. 

Agree. Time to watch Boston get to climo snowfall 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Weenie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Winterweatherlover said:

NYC Metro is the worst because of Urban Heating (aka March 2018) for any kind of marginal event. But yes you are right the timing and temps are critical. If it's 3/20 and it's in the 20s at night the sun angle is a non factor, or even in the daytime if it's below freezing the sun angle doesn't matter as much.  

Unfortunately there is no northwest NYC subforum, so people north of I84 are forced to be part of the NYC metro, which is a completely different winter climate.  Also, I'm not buying Urban Heat Island effect for western parts of Union, Essex, Bergen counties in NJ or the undeveloped meadowlands etc.  It is the proximity to the ocean that seems to put the NYC metro area on the rain/snow line border more times than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Dark Star said:

Unfortunately there is no northwest NYC subforum, so people north of I84 are forced to be part of the NYC metro, which is a completely different winter climate.  Also, I'm not buying Urban Heat Island effect for western parts of Union, Essex, Bergen counties in NJ or the undeveloped meadowlands etc.  It is the proximity to the ocean that seems to put the NYC metro area on the rain/snow line border more times than not.

There is an interior NE and NW burbs subforum (even that though varies significantly because the climate of Bergen County/Southern Westchester is drastically different than Sullivan/Ulster counties).


In terms of the urban heating it is a factor, ocean is as well but often times in marginal events LI (especially north shore) and even the NJ coast get more accumulation than the city. 

 

  

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...